ADVERTISEMENT

So, The Country needs more.....

It worked for Reagan, just saying... If the idiot, Obama had not dismantled the Nuclear missile defense in Belgium, this would all be unnecessary.
 
This story is from the same paper that just wrote a glowing obituary for the terrorist who killed the Christmas shoppers in Germany.

You ladies shouldn't worry unless something actually happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
This story is from the same paper that just wrote a glowing obituary for the terrorist who killed the Christmas shoppers in Germany.

You ladies shouldn't worry unless something actually happens.
What story are you talking about?
 
That's going to lead to more F-bombs, I bet.

140224-us-defense-chart-215p_d40ecad0e93608f7224bcfd4d5df8a2f.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg
 
I keep reading where his "team" is having to explain his comments to news outlets. Oh well.
 
I keep reading where his "team" is having to explain his comments to news outlets. Oh well.
They are but the thing is he IS saying exactly what he means and they run around behind him cleaning it up to fit into the political correctness he swore off during his campaign. Basically we are going to get the same crap at the end of the day but it will be after his Nannies correct everything for him.
 
So you didn't have those same fears when Obama authorized the modernization of our current nuclear arsenal to make it easier to bomb other countries?
I don't like it no matter who does it. I'm not a fan of him either. Trump's temperament is much more of a fear for me though but hopefully his sitters will keep him in line.
 
Positive things. Helping, building, feeding, growing, educating and bringing REAL peace. Things we sometimes do but then cancel it out by doing something that is the opposite and harmful in the end for others.
I disagree 100%. In my opinion. The Federal Government's #1 responsibility and priority is for the safety and defense of us and our allies. We cannot do any of the above you listed without this. Real peace is not achieved the pacifism. That had been proven throughout human history. REAL Peace is achieved through strength and conviction for liberty.

Therefore, the #1 item for spending should be defense. The government could spend money on nothing else and we would be a much better place because we would figure it out and not depend on the government every time we stubbed our toe. And since our economy is bigger that any in the world we should spend more that any other country on defense. That makes the world more peaceful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelNation11
Our nuclear arsenal has been modernized continutly since inception 70 years ago.
Obama put them on cruise missiles. That didn't have to be done to modernize them. Even Hillary didn't agree with that. It would have been just as easy to destroy the warhead instead of making it more deadly. Let's be honest though, with the exception of far left politicians no one wants to get rid of those weapons.
 
Ya, I wish we'd stop spending so much on our own defense. The tactic of paying for other countries arsenals (especially those of which we've had checkered relationships with) seems so much more logical.
 
I disagree 100%. In my opinion. The Federal Government's #1 responsibility and priority is for the safety and defense of us and our allies. We cannot do any of the above you listed without this. Real peace is not achieved the pacifism. That had been proven throughout human history. REAL Peace is achieved through strength and conviction for liberty.

Therefore, the #1 item for spending should be defense. The government could spend money on nothing else and we would be a much better place because we would figure it out and not depend on the government every time we stubbed our toe. And since our economy is bigger that any in the world we should spend more that any other country on defense. That makes the world more peaceful.
Which goes back to us being assholes. Those who are not assholes don't have to defend themselves because no one wants to hurt them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Those who are not assholes don't have to defend themselves because no one wants to hurt them.

This is dangerous thinking. Was Poland being assholes before they got blitzkrieged in WWII? Were the people in the twin towers on 9/11 being assholes before they had planes flown into them? Was MLK being an asshole before he was assassinated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheel0910
Which goes back to us being assholes. Those who are not assholes don't have to defend themselves because no one wants to hurt them.

I'd rather be a living asshole than a dead nonchalant (putting this nicely).

And the belief that no one wants to hurt those who aren't "assholes" is just wrong. Ask Sandy Hook. Ask the folks in Switzerland a few years back (wasn't this one of the "most peaceful" nations in the world?).
 
I'd rather be a living asshole than a dead nonchalant (putting this nicely).

And the belief that no one wants to hurt those who aren't "assholes" is just wrong. Ask Sandy Hook. Ask the folks in Switzerland a few years back (wasn't this one of the "most peaceful" nations in the world?).

Scratch that, I meant Denmark (Copenhagen).

Terror attacks by country: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Terrorist_incidents_by_country

Most peaceful nations: http://travel.amerikanki.com/most-peaceful-countries-in-the-world/
 
This is dangerous thinking. Was Poland being assholes before they got blitzkrieged in WWII? Were the people in the twin towers on 9/11 being assholes before they had planes flown into them? Was MLK being an asshole before he was assassinated?

Lol. I can't even believe you had to explain this
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hark_The_Sound_2010
I have a hard time wrapping my arms around a man not owning a cell phone or ever entering a Walmart actually following Twitter.
Trust me, you would have a hard time wrapping your arms around me period....lol
 
Which goes back to us being assholes. Those who are not assholes don't have to defend themselves because no one wants to hurt them.
So everyone who gets attacked by an aggressive enemy is an asshole? Everyone who has a strong defense is and asshole? Go it. Guess I am content with being an asshole. and a deplorable.....
 
This is dangerous thinking. Was Poland being assholes before they got blitzkrieged in WWII? Were the people in the twin towers on 9/11 being assholes before they had planes flown into them? Was MLK being an asshole before he was assassinated?
We live in a country lead by assholes. That doesn't mean every person in it is one. I know we will never have peace because we will always have assholes in the world. It's just wishful thinking on my part. After this life we will all finally know peace though so all hope isn't lost at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
I'll admit, I'm scared of the man because of his stupidity. A man that stupid is dangerous.

I don't get how so many people label Trump as stupid or some type of buffoon. The dude is one of the more successful businessmen in the world and clearly figured out a way to defeat the entire establishment, disrupt our entire mainstream media foundation, and never waver on his approach despite all the outside noise to do so. I hardly find that accomplishable from someone who is stupid.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT