| STAT | VALUE | PCTLE | HISTORICAL COMPARISON |
| Base Stats | |||
| FG% | 38 | 13 |
|
| 3FG% | 26 | 22 | 
|
| 2FG% | 45 | 25 | 
|
| FT% | 78 | 74 | 
|
| fg% | 35 | 84 | 
|
| 3fg% | 27 | 72 |
|
| 2fg% | 37 | 85 | 
|
| ft% | 44 | 95 |
|
| PTS/POSS | 0.83 | 22 |
|
| pts/poss | 0.64 | 93 |
|
| TOTPOSS | 143 | 5 | 
|
| POSDIF | 9 | 84 |
|
| %LOB | 9 | 92 |
|
| %lob | 16 | 50 | 
|
| SmithIdx | 0.0872 | 70 | 
|
| Interesting Stats | |||
| AST/TO | 2.43 | 92 |
|
| %RMS | 0.28 | 26 |
|
| %rms | 0.06 | 96 | 
|
| ast/fg | 0.78 | 2 |
|
STAT = Statistic being reportd
VALUE = Value of reported stat from the current game
PCTLE = Percentile When Compared to All UNC Games since 1996
Historical Comparison = Graphic Portrayal of PCTLE. Marks depict 20% quintiles, as well as 50%.
FG% = UNC Total Field Goal Percentage (47.0% avg since 1996)
3FG% = UNC 3-point Field Goal Percentage (35.6%)
2FG% = UNC 2-point Field Goal Percentage (51.4%)
FT% = UNC Free Throw Percentage (70.0%)
fg% = Opponent Total Field Goal Percentage (41.6%)
3fg% = Opponent 3-point Field Goal Percentage (33.8%)
2fg% = Opponent 2-point Field Goal Percentage (45.9%)
ft% = Opponent Free Throw Percentage (68.2%)
PTS/POSS = UNC Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.934)
pts/poss = Opponent Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.846))
POSS = UNC Total Possessions (Smith Method, 85.6)
POSDIF = UNC Advantage in Total Possessions (Smith Method, 2.03)
%LOB = UNC Percentage Loss of Ball (TO/POSS, 15.9)
%lob = Opponent Percentage Loss of Ball (to/poss, 16.4)
MOV = Margin of Victory (9.43)
%FROM3 = UNC Percentage of FG Attempts Taken From 3 (35.6%)
AST/POSS = UNC Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.20)
AST/FG = UNC Assists Per Field Goal (0.59)
AST/TO = UNC Assists Per Turnover (1.4)
%from3 = Opponent Percentage of Shots Taken From 3 (33.8)
ast/poss = Opponent Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.16)
ast/fg = Opponent Assists Per Field Goal (0.52)
ast/to = Opponent Assists Per Turnover (1.1)
poss = Opponents Total Possessions (Smith Method) (83.6)
TOTPOSS = Total Possessions in the Game(Smith Method, 169.3)
SmithIdx = UNC Total of Pts/Poss minus Offensive Goal (0.95) + Defensive Goal (0.85) minus Opponent Pts/Poss (avg: -0.01)
VALUE = Value of reported stat from the current game
PCTLE = Percentile When Compared to All UNC Games since 1996
Historical Comparison = Graphic Portrayal of PCTLE. Marks depict 20% quintiles, as well as 50%.
FG% = UNC Total Field Goal Percentage (47.0% avg since 1996)
3FG% = UNC 3-point Field Goal Percentage (35.6%)
2FG% = UNC 2-point Field Goal Percentage (51.4%)
FT% = UNC Free Throw Percentage (70.0%)
fg% = Opponent Total Field Goal Percentage (41.6%)
3fg% = Opponent 3-point Field Goal Percentage (33.8%)
2fg% = Opponent 2-point Field Goal Percentage (45.9%)
ft% = Opponent Free Throw Percentage (68.2%)
PTS/POSS = UNC Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.934)
pts/poss = Opponent Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.846))
POSS = UNC Total Possessions (Smith Method, 85.6)
POSDIF = UNC Advantage in Total Possessions (Smith Method, 2.03)
%LOB = UNC Percentage Loss of Ball (TO/POSS, 15.9)
%lob = Opponent Percentage Loss of Ball (to/poss, 16.4)
MOV = Margin of Victory (9.43)
%FROM3 = UNC Percentage of FG Attempts Taken From 3 (35.6%)
AST/POSS = UNC Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.20)
AST/FG = UNC Assists Per Field Goal (0.59)
AST/TO = UNC Assists Per Turnover (1.4)
%from3 = Opponent Percentage of Shots Taken From 3 (33.8)
ast/poss = Opponent Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.16)
ast/fg = Opponent Assists Per Field Goal (0.52)
ast/to = Opponent Assists Per Turnover (1.1)
poss = Opponents Total Possessions (Smith Method) (83.6)
TOTPOSS = Total Possessions in the Game(Smith Method, 169.3)
SmithIdx = UNC Total of Pts/Poss minus Offensive Goal (0.95) + Defensive Goal (0.85) minus Opponent Pts/Poss (avg: -0.01)
Discussion
Ugly, Ugly, Ugly! This was one where you burn the game tape. If we add both teams' offensive efficiencies, we get 1.47, the second-lowest performace of the season (BC on 1/29 was the lowest with 1.41, ugh!).
Was it great defense or was UVA just awful. It was all UVA. One of the important stats to look at is UVA's assists per field goal. With a whopping 0.78 a/fgm, it was the 17th worst performance by UNC in restricting an opponent in the last 950 games, and the worst of the season for the UNC defense. (The 950-game average is 0.51)
While we showed more development on defense, the offense wasn't there. Shooting 38% wasnt good, but UNC moved the ball really well, so I'll chalk it up to a poor shooting night. UVA's chippy defense is disruptive to shooters, but they didn't get out and disrupt passing lanes. UNC had 0.68 a/fgm, a 78th percentile game. Excellent!
UNC dominated the boards, getting 10 more possessions than UVA in our slowest game played since last season's game at UVA. There were only 143 possessions in this game, and this team averages 159 possessions/game (program avg since 1996 is 169/gm)
The team shot a wonderful 78% from the FT line. Interestingly there were only 8 possessions that ended in 1-and-1s or 2-shots. The lowest total was 4 misc. trips in the game with Michigan this season. The average is 18.06. We've had single digit games 45 times in the last 950 games, with 9 coming this season.
