ADVERTISEMENT

This Is Where You Poast Your Favorite WikiLeaks Emails

UNC71-00

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Feb 25, 2003
26,885
13,276
113
with apologies to my good friend @Nuk'EM Heels , let's use this thread to poast noteworthy leaked Clinton emails. It will be easier to reference if they are all in one place.

I will start. Here's an email where Clinton campaign manager notes that Hillary hates average Americans. (Did anyone actually think this wasn't the case?)

email-hate.jpg
 
This is one of the more damning of all her campaign's emails. Which, she owns. No getting around it.
 
@prlyles - This one is for you- The Clintons conspired with the media to label Trump dangerous and bigoted. Looks like you took the bait, hook, line and sinker.

Screen-Shot-2016-10-11-at-10.06.05-PM.jpg
 
Last edited:
Apparently Anonymous has gotten all 33K missing emails and will be releasing about a week before campaign ends. They also have internal polls from Podesta's computer showing Trump in the lead.

But yeah, Hillary is going to win in a runaway.
 
oh look @tarheelbybirth Hillary had her debate questions against Bernie given to her beforehand. Yeah, Bernie got a fair shake from your girl. Or are you for Bernie? I can't remember...

Anyways, courtesy of Donna Brazile, who had previously lied and said she never gave the question to Hillary.

800x445xScreen-Shot-2016-10-11-at-10.39.26-AM-1024x569.png.pagespeed.ic.MxrdlSNgBw.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuk'EM Heels
oh look @tarheelbybirth Hillary had her debate questions against Bernie given to her beforehand. Yeah, Bernie got a fair shake from your girl. Or are you for Bernie? I can't remember...

Anyways, courtesy of Donna Brazile, who had previously lied and said she never gave the question to Hillary.

800x445xScreen-Shot-2016-10-11-at-10.39.26-AM-1024x569.png.pagespeed.ic.MxrdlSNgBw.webp
Perfect!
 
Oh look @tarheelbybirth The Clinton camp thought they needed to throw you a bone. Because they think you are a bitch who just needs a snack to be kept in line.

Enjoy casting your vote for Hillary. Maybe she will throw the ball for you later or take you on a nice walk.

A newly released Wikileaks email from the Podesta hack reveals a plan by Clinton surrogates to fool “bitching” Bernie Sanders voters into supporting Hillary by offering them a largely meaningless change in rules that apply to superdelegates.

The email was sent by Hillary’s former chief on staff Tamera Luzzatto on March 20 of this year. The recipients included Podesta, the chairman of Clinton’s campaign, and Robby Mook, her campaign manager.

Luzzatto forwards “Sanders-related advice from Mark Siegel,” the former Palm Beach County Democratic Party Chairman.

In the email, Siegel explains how Bernie’s “sometimes self-righteous ideologues” could be fooled “to go home happy and enthusiastic in working their asses off for Hillary.”

2345emailnew.jpg


“So here’s my idea. Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary,” wrote Siegel.

“Why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs. (Frankly, DNC members don’t really represent constituencies anyway. I should know. I served on the DNC first as Executive Director and then as an elected member for 10 years.)

So if we “give” Bernie this in the Convention’s rules committee, his people will think they’ve “won” something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn’t make any difference anyway. They win. We don’t lose. Everyone is happy.”

In other words, Bernie supporters could be offered some symbolic ‘victory’ that actually means nothing at all in order to trick them into becoming Hillary supporters.

Luzzatto shared the email with Mook and Podesta “as a favor and cause of his role in the Dems’ delegate system.”
 
This is great. And apparently it's only about 10% complete.

But if Anonymous really does have the 33k missing emails, she better hope they are all about yoga and Chelseas wedding.
 
The only thing that just doesn't make sense to me is why would anyone, especially a politician put anything damning in an email. Everyone knows they are easily hacked and why have anything in text that could be held against you in the future. Hell, even I won't text something from my phone that I don't want in text for another to see. Those things have to be spoken. It just doesn't make sense because you cannot hide anything that is in electronic print.
 
The only thing that just doesn't make sense to me is why would anyone, especially a politician put anything damning in an email. Everyone knows they are easily hacked and why have anything in text that could be held against you in the future. Hell, even I won't text something from my phone that I don't want in text for another to see. Those things have to be spoken. It just doesn't make sense because you cannot hide anything that is in electronic print.
It's arrogance on their part.
 
Everyone knows they are easily hacked and why have anything in text that could be held against you in the future.

Because they're on an incredibly secure government server that can't be hacked. These people aren't dumb enough to have their own servers where all their emails can be hacked into. Oh wait...
 
@prlyles - This one is for you- The Clintons conspired with the media to label Clinton dangerous and bigoted. Looks like you took the bait, hook, line and sinker.

Screen-Shot-2016-10-11-at-10.06.05-PM.jpg
Sorry 71 but you will not find one instant where I have ever defended Clinton
 
Sorry 71 but you will not find one instant where I have ever defended Clinton

The fact that you don't go after Clinton with the same vitriol that you do Trump is, in essence, "defending" her. Because she is every bit deserving of criticism, if not more deserving, than Donald Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC71-00 and Louigi
The fact that you don't go after Clinton with the same vitriol that you do Trump is, in essence, "defending" her. Because she is every bit deserving of criticism, if not more deserving, than Donald Trump.

He never goes after Clinton and brushes off her many shortcomings with "at least she's not Trump". Yet somehow he expects us to believe he always votes Republican.

Color me skeptical.
 
You have said you are voting for her, so I thought you should know how they have been playing you.
I'm not sure if I ever said I was going to vote for her. I have said many times that I will never vote for Trump. The way things look now I don't think I will have to vote for her.
 
I'm not sure if I ever said I was going to vote for her. I have said many times that I will never vote for Trump. The way things look now I don't think I will have to vote for her.

Your vote won't matter in NC for certain. You might make a difference for Hillary in Virginia though.
 
Every Virginia I have ever met was both hot and smart...kinda like one of those librarian types. Could be a good investment to stay in. Just saying.
I don't know about librarians in Virginia, but apparently there are some hot ones in St. Andrews.

standrewsma.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue2010
Ask one of your democrat buddies. They are pretty adept at voter fraud.

This is the thing I never understand come every election season (not just the presidential ones). I actually got into an argument with one of the people in charge of handing out ballots the last time I went and voted.

I simply walked in, she asked me my address, I gave it to her - and she said my name, I said yes - and she gave me the ballot. I was like, wait a second, why don't I have to show any sort of proof that I am who I say I am? She responded, because there are people who come to vote that have no identification stating who they are. I said that most people have a driver's license or state ID, but that I did realize not everyone did, but I was under the impression that every citizen was either born here (and would therefore either have or be able to obtain a birth certificate) or were granted citizenship after moving here (and would then either have or be able to obtain documentation of that). She simply responded: that's just the way it is. I then said, I didn't even need to know my own name - you were the one who supplied my name once I told you my address. What if someone else had come up and picked my address out of the air, and voted under my name? She said they would have realized that once I came to vote (which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What if I never came? Or even if I did come, what would they do after the fact? The ballots have no names so they would never know which one was cast illegally). At this point the cop that was stationed there was starting to take notice of our discussion so I just dropped it, but damn.

TL;DR - anyone can vote in place of anyone if you know their address.
 
Every Virginia I have ever met was both hot and smart...kinda like one of those librarian types. Could be a good investment to stay in. Just saying.
I don't know about that. I played in a college baseball summer league up there in the late 80's and even the little babies were ugly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT