I don't know about librarians in Virginia, but apparently there are some hot ones in St. Andrews.
![]()
Why are they prejudice against toilets? WTF did they ever do?
I don't know about librarians in Virginia, but apparently there are some hot ones in St. Andrews.
![]()
I don't know about that. I played in a college baseball summer league up there in the late 80's and even the little babies were ugly.
There's a Trump joke to be made in every sentence. He's so diverse and he makes for the best jokes. No one is as good for making jokes about than Trump.Hmm... there is a Trump joke to be made in that sentence.
That's never made much sense to me either. Especially considering you need an id for the following:This is the thing I never understand come every election season (not just the presidential ones). I actually got into an argument with one of the people in charge of handing out ballots the last time I went and voted.
I simply walked in, she asked me my address, I gave it to her - and she said my name, I said yes - and she gave me the ballot. I was like, wait a second, why don't I have to show any sort of proof that I am who I say I am? She responded, because there are people who come to vote that have no identification stating who they are. I said that most people have a driver's license or state ID, but that I did realize not everyone did, but I was under the impression that every citizen was either born here (and would therefore either have or be able to obtain a birth certificate) or were granted citizenship after moving here (and would then either have or be able to obtain documentation of that). She simply responded: that's just the way it is. I then said, I didn't even need to know my own name - you were the one who supplied my name once I told you my address. What if someone else had come up and picked my address out of the air, and voted under my name? She said they would have realized that once I came to vote (which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What if I never came? Or even if I did come, what would they do after the fact? The ballots have no names so they would never know which one was cast illegally). At this point the cop that was stationed there was starting to take notice of our discussion so I just dropped it, but damn.
TL;DR - anyone can vote in place of anyone if you know their address.
That's never made much sense to me either. Especially considering you need an id for the following:
1) Purchase of alcohol
2) Purchase of tobacco
3) Applying for welfare
4) Applying for ObamaCare
5) Applying for a job
6) Driving, purchasing, or renting a car
7) Purchasing some over- the-counter medicines
8) R-Rated movies
9) Entering most bars
10) Purchasing a gun or applying for a firearm license
11) Opening a bank account, and occasionally when cashing checks
12) Renting a hotel room
13) Applying for a fishing license
14) Donating blood
And there are many more. I can't imagine there are a lot of people who can legally vote that hasn't done at least one of those before.
Because they're on an incredibly secure government server that can't be hacked. These people aren't dumb enough to have their own servers where all their emails can be hacked into. Oh wait...
This is the thing I never understand come every election season (not just the presidential ones). I actually got into an argument with one of the people in charge of handing out ballots the last time I went and voted.
I simply walked in, she asked me my address, I gave it to her - and she said my name, I said yes - and she gave me the ballot. I was like, wait a second, why don't I have to show any sort of proof that I am who I say I am? She responded, because there are people who come to vote that have no identification stating who they are. I said that most people have a driver's license or state ID, but that I did realize not everyone did, but I was under the impression that every citizen was either born here (and would therefore either have or be able to obtain a birth certificate) or were granted citizenship after moving here (and would then either have or be able to obtain documentation of that). She simply responded: that's just the way it is. I then said, I didn't even need to know my own name - you were the one who supplied my name once I told you my address. What if someone else had come up and picked my address out of the air, and voted under my name? She said they would have realized that once I came to vote (which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What if I never came? Or even if I did come, what would they do after the fact? The ballots have no names so they would never know which one was cast illegally). At this point the cop that was stationed there was starting to take notice of our discussion so I just dropped it, but damn.
TL;DR - anyone can vote in place of anyone if you know their address.
No need for any voter fraud this go 'round . . this election is already rigged.
![]()
For as long as I can remember I have had to show ID and my aunt worked at the polling place and I STILL had to show it to her and she knew where I lived, for years now. They have to confirm it with their list of registered voters and make sure the address matches up, etc. That does not happen everywhere else??
Oh, no... I've voted here since 2008 (near Clemson). I do the exact same thing. My address, they ask my name and off the the ballot machine I go. My ID/Drivers License never enters into the picture.I'm not sure what the rules/laws are elsewhere, or if they're followed. I just know that in MA, you most certainly do NOT need to show any sort of ID. You give them an address, they say a first name back to you, you say yes, they give you a ballot.
I wouldn't be surprised if SC required (or encourages) ID to vote. They don't do that in MA though, because the people in power in this state (Democrats) know that they'll be getting the votes of anyone who isn't legally allowed to vote - so why would they turn those people away?
asking a local dem , they have dead people voting , you should be a breeze.How am I suppose to vote in Virginia?
They haven't denied a single one. Does that tell you something?anything can be hacked though, we know this... plus, now they are saying that these emails are probably not THE real emails after all. It is sure easy to fake some, I know that but I really haven't read all of the ones released yet either. I have no doubt there are some classified emails that she should not have had on that server and definitely she is covering up something but I don't think these are the ones.... something is off. I feel it. OR maybe I watch too much of my fave TV show Scandal and House of Cards. LOL
Really? You don't know? and you say I try to keep up...LMMFAO.The Voter ID requisite makes perfect sense to me. That could be coupled with the Mike Rowe article thread. I'm not sure why there is so much aversion to showing an ID to vote.
No, I never say you "try to keep up." I never encourage you either way.Really? You don't know? and you say I try to keep up...LMMFAO.
↑No, I never say you "try to keep up." I never encourage you either way.
I would assume this is something we actually agree on, and you decide to take even THAT and use it to try and insult me. That's a brilliant strategy to get things to go your way.
I read today that Tramp wants the POTUS candidates to be drug tested before next Wednesday's debate![]()
![]()
![]()
Sniffles must be getting a lot of phone calls, emails and tweets asking if he's doing cocaine . .
Tonight I heard that Mister Tramp wants drug tests done because he believes Clinton is taking PEDs . . .
![]()
This guy is just flat out Looney Tunes.
So, let me get this straight. It's possible that she is sick and they are giving her medicine for it? The horror!He thinks they are pumping her full of drugs to keep the seizures and coughing down. He's not the only one who thinks this.
He thinks they are pumping her full of drugs to keep the seizures and coughing down. He's not the only one who thinks this.
So, let me get this straight. It's possible that she is sick and they are giving her medicine for it? The horror!
Maybe, but there's nothing that says she has to. It certainly wouldn't change that many votes if she did. It's obvious that she is not healthy, so if health is a deal breaker for a voter then they already aren't voting for her.Sure.
Is it possible that she has a significant neurological issue that she hasn't disclosed?
Maybe, but there's nothing that says she has to. It certainly wouldn't change that many votes if she did. It's obvious that she is not healthy, so if health is a deal breaker for a voter then they already aren't voting for her.
Her health is under a medical audit, when the audit is over, she'll release her health records.
![]()