Oh, and to be more accurate, it is Trump who needs the "safe space." Suddenly, these words frighten him. I'm just in opposition of his attempt at censorship.
I don't really listen to the media. I have no doubt that everything is cataclysmic to them because they're a TV show and they need ratings and viewership.
I don't watch news on TV. In fact, the only time I watched TV news since November 2016, was last Tuesday night when Moore lost to Jones. I watched CNN and it was pretty blatant at how the people on the panel were heavily slanted against Trump. They even brought Rick Santorum in to be the pro-GOP figure. I watched it to see the coverage of the campaign HQ's and to see Moore pandering to religious people and refuse to concede. But, the CNN "people" were very biased from my perception. And, I like to believe that is because I don't watch it and I'm objective. I listen to talk radio when I'm driving. That is the polar opposite. Trump can do no wrong and the "Left" is out to get him. I'm listening less and less now that I have a bluetooth speaker.
I used the exact same phrase when discussing the news of his diet Coke consumption last week.
Very similar reports as to when Mueller supposedly got Trumps bank records or when it was reported that Flynn had spilled the beans on Trump and the market went down 350 points. Joy Behar and Brian Ross say hello.
Where is the link to the statement from Lloyd? The (Source) link is just a CNN link that is referring to the original story, from what I could tell. It would be a huge relief to find out that this was embellished.
The story was sourced from multiple people who were part of the discussions. They obviously interpreted the discussion differently than other participants. WaPo ran with their version of the story -- eagerly, one would assume -- but that doesn't make it "fake news."
I have ad-blockers on. But, I saw this at the bottom.
Yes, because news agencies with skeleton editorial staffs are in a click race to confirm our confirmation biases. That makes them negligent and inaccurate but not fake, as evidenced by their subsequent edits.
I don't disagree with the accusations you state like Breitbart. The problem is that there should be no bias in journalism. Just report the damn facts! Both sides are so eager to "get" the other side that they print or report untruths. To me that's fake news, no matter what side it comes from. Screw up in your job as much as they do and see how long you last.
Eh. You could argue that this style of reporting is better for the bottom line. Outrage and "breaking news" are what the people want to read. It's as much our fault as consumers as it is the fault of the media outlets IMO.
It’s not censorship in the constitutional sense. There are no guarantees of freedom of speech when dealing in government business much like any business. He has every right to direct the activities of this agency. The people that work there just can’t use the words in any official capacity, but can still use them away from work.
That's how I took it from the start. In other words, if your research centers on something silly like, I don't know, how the changing climate will impact fish species, you may want to tiptoe around the whole "climate change" thing so as not to offend the delicate sensibilities of this administration and its base. If your research is about helping transgender folks I guess you might as well go ahead and move to Canada for a while.
I remember the IRS doing something really similar. Didn't agree then and I don't now if this is true. If you are pissed now but weren't then please explain.
Yeah... that sounds like a good way to operate. Trump is well-versed on sciency stuff.
Why in hell should they be doing research ‘about helping transgender folks’? Wtf? I would hope the treasury isn't being plundered in the name of that sort of lunacy.
