5 more scholarships to fill, and the staff intends to fill them all.Hopefully the first of many
The fact he is willing to take a reduced bench role when most players in the portal want bigger roles.Is this a good addition? I mean obviously Hubert and Wojcik think so, but what makes him a good choice?
He is significantly better than Lebo. Was that a serious question or are you just being funny? Lebo isn't averaging 15 and 7 on 38% 3pt shooting even on the JV squad.Too many good players in the portal to sign a guy because he is in the family. Is he any better than Lebo ? Go after 3 athletic shooters and 2 front court bigs.
He can shoot and play multiple positions which is exactly what you want to build depth.Is this a good addition? I mean obviously Hubert and Wojcik think so, but what makes him a good choice?
He looked TOTALLY left handed there. Did he even go right once ? Just what stuck out to me, from that clip. And some awful dee...lol
I agree. And shooters need to be in the flow of the game to be effective. Just another kid happy to sit the bench at UNC and be a cheerleader.Not sure how this is any better than developing a player we already had that transferred.
Hubert Davis don't develop players they either got it or they don't!Not sure how this is any better than developing a player we already had that transferred.
Yeah I think this is a big part of it. He also has a good A-TO ratio, rebounding numbers, and got awarded for the highest GPA on his team, so he's a smart hustle player. Not bad for filling out your roster (doesn't look like we'll have a scholarship crunch...).The fact he is willing to take a reduced bench role when most players in the portal want bigger roles.
Don’t pee on this dudes rainbows and unicorn.Yeah I think this is a big part of it. He also has a good A-TO ratio, rebounding numbers, and got awarded for the highest GPA on his team, so he's a smart hustle player. Not bad for filling out your roster (doesn't look like we'll have a scholarship crunch...).
On the other hand, I'd hold off on any "designated shooter" tags for a guy who's a 67% career free throw shooter. As we saw with Nance, 3-point percentage can be noisy, and I'm a bit worried he's not actually a great shooter. Hopefully he's pretty good there, otherwise I think he'll struggle to get minutes.
I can only lol that all his scores were against Walton, McKoy, and Love. Not exactly a murderer's row of perimeter defenders!
It's better in the sense Wojcik is hopefully happy in a 5-10 min a game role. The other guys clearly were not.Not sure how this is any better than developing a player we already had that transferred.
So if he looked bad, what adjective would you use to describe the UNC players in that video (Davis, Love, Walton, McKoy, Manek, Bacot, Garcia, Black) ?Ehhh.. he looked pretty bad in that video against us. Did not see any outside shot and not very athletic.. he was one dimensional with that left hand on all of his points. I know that video was over a year ago but still. This doesn't look any better than Platek to me.. I've said this before, at UNC, we can't just settle for anyone.
Honestly I would be surprised if he has that many minutes. Spot guy, practice player type.I can only lol that all his scores were against Walton, McKoy, and Love. Not exactly a murderer's row of perimeter defenders!
It's better in the sense Wojcik is hopefully happy in a 5-10 min a game role. The other guys clearly were not.
I imagine we're expecting him to get at least a few minutes. Otherwise, why take him? I'd have held the scholarship until you have more roster certainty if there's truly no expectation he plays. But yeah, sorta hard to see him as a fit. Is he actually better than Dunn?Honestly I would be surprised if he has that many minutes. Spot guy, practice player type.
And does Dunn stay with Wojcik coming.I imagine we're expecting him to get at least a few minutes. Otherwise, why take him? I'd have held the scholarship until you have more roster certainty if there's truly no expectation he plays. But yeah, sorta hard to see him as a fit. Is he actually better than Dunn?
There will be more coming in the portal. Who knows maybe he beats out Dunn, but I would guess he is the number 5 guard behind RJ, Wilcher, Trimble, and Dunn as is. Heck, Hubert still wants Timberlake. I think he is destined for break glass in case of emergency use.I imagine we're expecting him to get at least a few minutes. Otherwise, why take him? I'd have held the scholarship until you have more roster certainty if there's truly no expectation he plays. But yeah, sorta hard to see him as a fit. Is he actually better than Dunn?
Seems he wants to be with the big boys his dad had him around his whole life, top shelf. He struggled at mid major Loyola, transfered to low major and did well. Now he finishes saying he was UNC level.I imagine we're expecting him to get at least a few minutes. Otherwise, why take him? I'd have held the scholarship until you have more roster certainty if there's truly no expectation he plays. But yeah, sorta hard to see him as a fit. Is he actually better than Dunn?
I hope he isn't needed much more than that.Honestly I would be surprised if he has that many minutes. Spot guy, practice player type.
I didn't see their highlights in that video. Just his..So if he looked bad, what adjective would you use to describe the UNC players in that video (Davis, Love, Walton, McKoy, Manek, Bacot, Garcia, Black) ?
You saw them on defense right? And the score at the bottom of the screen?I didn't see their highlights in that video. Just his..
All 6 spots. Love, Puff, Styles, Nickel, McKoy, Shaver = 6 open spotsAnyone who thinks we couldn't do better than this is crazy... he was rated 49th best in the portal. This was not a great get unless he's happy to get mop up minutes only.. or unless Hubert is planning on filling all 5 spots.. felt like we could do way better than this. This is good if he's the worst one we get in the portal, if not, then it's bad.