With a few fish left in the pond hopefully we can reel some big ones in to finish strong in February.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw somewhere that one of the recruiting coordinator type of people stated, on signing day, that we'd probably end up with 19 to 21, so maybe 4 to 6 more.With a few fish left in the pond hopefully we can reel some big ones in to finish strong in February.
I saw somewhere that one of the recruiting coordinator type of people stated, on signing day, that we'd probably end up with 19 to 21, so maybe 4 to 6 more.
So I'll take Barnes, Dax, Warren Thompson, Mychale Sallahudin, Sandidge, and Chatman.
Signing this many would allow lbs to rotate back to lbI agree blazers, the RB position seems full - unless they are looking at someone for a position change. Bigger needs elsewhere
Sutton was the only former LB in my list. Let's Stanton Truitt exclusively play A-back, That would still make it 6-deepSigning this many would allow lbs to rotate back to lb
We entered camp w 4We moved 2 to RB last year
We play 1 RB at a time, and Fedora clearly does not come close to over-using the RB position. So I'd say 7 is plenty.Apparently we lead for 3* Kavosiey Smoke. He's a bigger back, like Javonte and Antwuan Branch, but how many RBs do we need on the roster?
Stanton Truitt - Gr Sr
J Sutton - RS Jr
Jordan Brown - Jr
Michael Carter- Soph
Antwuan Branch - RS Fr
Javonte Williams
Devon Lawrence
seven already for 2018
The Fed spread uses many two-Rb sets and many two-TE sets (usually both aren't attached). Not sure what team you've been watching since 2012.We play 1 RB at a time, and Fedora clearly does not come close to over-using the RB position. So I'd say 7 is plenty.
I'm curious tooWelcome Ricky Miezan. Can we count him as a lacrosse commit? I kid I think that is now impossible
Do you mean for scholarship purposes? If so, then no he can't be counted as a lacrosse commit. The scholarship will come from the football allotment.Welcome Ricky Miezan. Can we count him as a lacrosse commit? I kid I think that is now impossible
No, it has to be football. Check out page 194 of the link.I thought I read something that said otherwise but maybe I'm thinking of someone else.
So he's not playing football his first year? The bylaws appear to state that he would have to be on a football scholarship if he sets foot on the field.First year he will be on lacrosse scholarship with the opportunity to earn a football scholarship his second year at UNC.
First year he will be on lacrosse scholarship with the opportunity to earn a football scholarship his second year at UNC.
Me wonders tooSo he's not playing football his first year?
Either you're high as shit or we've just got a commit.Do y'all like green barns? I always thought green barns would look good in Chapel Hill. I think they would be montilus, dang spell check, I mean marvelous.
Yes, wink-wink. Roger that.Do y'all like green barns? I always thought green barns would look good in Chapel Hill. I think they would be montilus, dang spell check, I mean marvelous.
Yes, wink-wink. Roger that.
Wait, are you saying what I think you're saying?
Then this O is probably going to be really good in 2019. Thomas Jackson and TE Fritts are the only guys set to graduate next yr. Probably no early entrants.Probably.
Bryant was far from the only coach who did that. In fact, it apparently wasn't just football coaches. Bryant people said that Rupp did it at UK, to make certain his freshman team always had at least 10 top HS players.Due to bear byrant oriented rules, if you play a down of football, you count toward that yr's fball scholarships rather than some other sport like track, lax, etc, so we can assume he won't be playing a rep. Still unclear practice and camp-wise.
So he's not playing football his first year? The bylaws appear to state that he would have to be on a football scholarship if he sets foot on the field.
After discussing this with a couple of different people on this site, it appears that the rule is he can only be on the lacrosse scholarship his freshman year if he doesn't play. He can still practice though. Think of it like a redshirt year.Correct me if i'm wrong, but I believe this is how it would work
Miezan would be on lacrosse scholarship, and count as a walk on in football (he can practice and play)
The only way he would have to be counted on a football scholarship, if he was deemed a "recruited" athlete for football. Meaning -He took an official football visit, had an in home visit from the football staff, and signed a letter of intent,or financial aid package. Per Bylaws 15.5.9.1 and 15.02.8
https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/bylawView?id=25686
https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/bylaw?bylawId=25679
This would make sense, as hypothetically, they don't want a football team to go full force recruiting a 5 star athlete, and he only counts toward a water polo scholarship. Think of how many 5 star's Nick Saban could get then..lol