Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt that means much for dook. These kids are all friends from AAU ball. Last year, dook didn't even make the tournament, so I doubt a run in March would mean anything, either. All programs are year-to-year these days.In that same interview G.G. says he likes to watch Banchero. That worries me, if Banchero gets ACC POY, ROY and if Duke makes a late run in March.
PI: Do you watch a lot of college or NBA? Who do you like to watch?
GJ: Player-wise in college, definitely a lot of Paolo (Banchero). He was one of my favorite players coming out of high school. In the NBA, guys like Kevin Durant, Jayson Tatum.
That's a big problem with the surefire OADs. They want to "build their brand" and avoid injury more than anything else, and that's fine. Only a few have that burning desire to win above all else.Doesn't worry me though. It makes sense he would watch athletic bigs with handles and versatility! The best have to compare themselves to the best! Hopefully, he doesn't pick up the inconsistent motor and lack of concern for team success from Banchero!
When words like this effect you, that he is a Banchero fan, would really only be a concern if Banchero would be with duke when GG plays college ball, he will not be. He was a fan of Banchero, was a fan of PJ Hall as well, PRIOR to their playing in college. Now GG will certainly consider how he will be used in the college game and a program that uses another guy in a similar fashion as he wants to be used, especially if that guy current in that program will not be back the following season, that yes, it is a factor. But all Hubert has to do is show the kid how Manek and Garcia have been used this season, their being used as Stretch guys shows Hubert is motivated to use a guy of his skill set as a stretch.In that same interview G.G. says he likes to watch Banchero. That worries me, if Banchero gets ACC POY, ROY and if Duke makes a late run in March.
PI: Do you watch a lot of college or NBA? Who do you like to watch?
GJ: Player-wise in college, definitely a lot of Paolo (Banchero). He was one of my favorite players coming out of high school. In the NBA, guys like Kevin Durant, Jayson Tatum.
Must get?Its really starting to look like GG is an absolute must get for HD and he needs to get some other people, If they miss the tourney this year, and then you lose love, bacot, black,manek and bringing in a ok recruiting class, makes you think next year will be a tough time too..... that makes year 3 make or break for HD
Thats a fair argument, but if we are talking year 3 and HD hasn't made the tourney (thats a big if, but lets just play hypothetical ) hes going to need all the help he can get, even if its a one year stop gap. And listen what do I know its just my opinion maybe the UNC brass gives him a 5 year leash, who knows, but i really got to think by year 3 hes gonna feel some big time pressure to produceMust get?
I think we get GG but is he a must get? I realize, on the surface there is a collective yes being screamed at me right now but... GG is a 1&D kid, so does GG in his 1 season with us give us in games the same kind of thing that duke has got from Banchero/Zion/Bagley? Or does he give us as a can't miss 5 star player the same thing Love/Naz/Kessler gave us?
There is a considerable portion of this UNC fan base, myself being 1 of those voices, that really prefer us to build the program so that we are able to file talented teams with solid experience, a thing you can not do if you are committed to the 1&D method of building your program. If like me, you want your program to build over time with the solid but not 5 star guys (not saying no 5 stars, saying sprinkle in 5stars but not a total sell out for them as has happened at duke and Ky) your chances at winning nattys is increased. I miss the days when we only started 1 or 2 freshmen because we had talented and now experienced players coming back. That is harder to do now days because the portal makes changing schools really to easy.
I prefer building a program, too, but you need a good coach to do that, and at this juncture we don't have that.........whether you want to admit that or not is up to you. Hubert may become a good coach, but he's made very little progress in that area so far.Must get?
I think we get GG but is he a must get? I realize, on the surface there is a collective yes being screamed at me right now but... GG is a 1&D kid, so does GG in his 1 season with us give us in games the same kind of thing that duke has got from Banchero/Zion/Bagley? Or does he give us as a can't miss 5 star player the same thing Love/Naz/Kessler gave us?
There is a considerable portion of this UNC fan base, myself being 1 of those voices, that really prefer us to build the program so that we are able to file talented teams with solid experience, a thing you can not do if you are committed to the 1&D method of building your program. If like me, you want your program to build over time with the solid but not 5 star guys (not saying no 5 stars, saying sprinkle in 5stars but not a total sell out for them as has happened at duke and Ky) your chances at winning nattys is increased. I miss the days when we only started 1 or 2 freshmen because we had talented and now experienced players coming back. That is harder to do now days because the portal makes changing schools really to easy.
It is not a matter of me admitting that, it is very much the case that I do NOT agree with the way you see Hubert as a coach.I prefer building a program, too, but you need a good coach to do that, and at this juncture we don't have that.........whether you want to admit that or not is up to you. Hubert may become a good coach, but he's made very little progress in that area so far.
Genuinely interested in hearing your answer: what is it you see in Hubert that makes you think he’s a good coach? And dont say he’s a nice guy or that players like himIt is not a matter of me admitting that, it is very much the case that I do NOT agree with the way you see Hubert as a coach.
It is not a matter of me admitting that, it is very much the case that I do NOT agree with the way you see Hubert as a coach.
As am I.........couldn't care less about how nice he is or how much the players like him. Point to something that helps prove your assertion that he's a good coach.Genuinely interested in hearing your answer: what is it you see in Hubert that makes you think he’s a good coach? And dont say he’s a nice guy or that players like him
As am I.........couldn't care less about how nice he is or how much the players like him. Point to something that helps prove your assertion that he's a good coach.
Im not saying Hubert is a bad coach(that may be a little harsh) and I would never argue at this moment in time, he's a good coach either. But, he has chosen to completely scrap Roys system for the new age "4out,1 in". In doing so, he is ultimately answerable for its success/failure. I can see anyone saying the 19-8 is success(and it is) but it is not a high enough level of success considering the talent inherited or for the Carolina program standard. Here is why I would say Hubert has disappointed this season.What's your evidence that he's a bad coach?
Actually, if I had to come up right now with 2 things that I may be a bit less than enamored over with what Hubert is as a head coach would be that he is to nice at times. The role of a coach has to be more of a father/son deal than a best buddy deal, the dividing line there being a degree of respect that has to be there for the player to the coach. Asst coaches tend to form relationships to players as being more friends, especially the younger coaches and that is fine for an asst coach but as a head coach that relationship has to change and I would suggest maybe it needs to change more. Players MUST respect the coach more than feel he is their buddy.Genuinely interested in hearing your answer: what is it you see in Hubert that makes you think he’s a good coach? And dont say he’s a nice guy or that players like him
1. You could be right that Hubert made a good decision to go to 4out,1 in. But it looks like he didn't knew how to implement it(at this late point in the season). Hubert not only had no head coaching experience, he had no experience in the offensive system he chose.1 - The system Roy was running for the last 2 years was dogshit. Or at least the results were and that’s what everybody is crying about, right? So maybe Hubert knew exactly what he was doing when he decided to put the 2 bigs system to rest. So frankly, this could be evidence for either side, I reckon.
2 - I’m going to need to see this chart you’ve made for every game that shows “good looks” before I can comment on that. no offense, but I’m not just going to take your word for it.
3 - In regards to Caleb and RJ’s play, this could be as much on Caleb and RJ as it is on Hubert. “Why don’t we sit guys that don’t play the right way?!!” Because Hubert is trying to win. He needs to to get the fan base off his back when a bunch of armchair QBs start talking about how he sucks.
4 - I don’t disagree that Hubert hasn’t been able to get these guys where they need to be. But remember, these aren’t his guys. And to make a claim that a coach can’t get through to players that he inherited from a previous coach and previous system is knee-jerk. This can’t be evaluated until after next year at least, probably closer to the end of the 2023-2024 season.
We don't have the pieces around him next season to make it payoff. In 2024 with GG surrounded by experienced role player, we can be a FF contender.I don't really like reclassifying as it seems to be only for the benefit of the school. I will take him of course, but I hope he stays in his class. A kid should enjoy his senior year in HS, especially if he a star athlete!
GG has 1 or 2 games left on his season, and him and his father said a decision will come soon after the season is over
yeaaa he mentions both Duke and South Carolina on the NIL stuff and not a single thing about UNC about NIL. but on the flip side, he talks about about a place that will treat him like family after basketball and all that which seems like a postive of UNC, so who knows. If it really is about NIL stuff its a downright embarrassment that UNC hasn't done better with it, for all those years we all complained (and rightfully so) about the dukes, kentucky, kansas, Arizona's all playing players and now its actually legal and UNC doesn't have its sh*t together.Based off the NIL talk, he doesn't seem big on us. Lol at misspelling Tar Heel as Tar Hell also in the article.
This is what I said as well. Carolina will get left in the dust if it can’t figure out the new world of recruiting. NIL is now legal and Carolina needs to adjust quickly. No reason not to do what you can within the rules given.yeaaa he mentions both Duke and South Carolina on the NIL stuff and not a single thing about UNC about NIL. but on the flip side, he talks about about a place that will treat him like family after basketball and all that which seems like a postive of UNC, so who knows. If it really is about NIL stuff its a downright embarrassment that UNC hasn't done better with it, for all those years we all complained (and rightfully so) about the dukes, kentucky, kansas, Arizona's all playing players and now its actually legal and UNC doesn't have its sh*t together.
The football team seems to be doing a lot better as far as infrastructure and planning for NIL. Hubert should probably give Mack a call. He really needs someone in the basketball office who does nothing but NIL stuff.yeaaa he mentions both Duke and South Carolina on the NIL stuff and not a single thing about UNC about NIL. but on the flip side, he talks about about a place that will treat him like family after basketball and all that which seems like a postive of UNC, so who knows. If it really is about NIL stuff its a downright embarrassment that UNC hasn't done better with it, for all those years we all complained (and rightfully so) about the dukes, kentucky, kansas, Arizona's all playing players and now its actually legal and UNC doesn't have its sh*t together.
No, I don't think it would define Hubert's work at all, would suggest that we know a good bit of how Hubert recruits of which I see in a very positive way. I think what defines things for Hubert is about how he develops the players he has in his charge, how they play together.It's debatable, but some would say this recruitment could define Hubert's tenure. I haven't decided if I agree with that or not. But I certainly recognize why some might think that.
Is that recent? What I'm seeing is from January 2021USC pick by Jaime Shaw