Now that UNC needs a DC, can you guys just go and get Muschamp!!
This post was edited on 12/11 7:18 PM by nolegeorge
This post was edited on 12/11 7:18 PM by nolegeorge
Muschamp ...
- Thread starter nolegeorge
- Start date
So you all dont think the school / boosters will shell out more money for a top coach? Whats holding them back?
Tradition, as it were.
UNC has a long history of being cheap with employees, faculty as well as coaches. The attitude is: Chapel Hill is so lovely and serene and UNC itself so marvellous, that great peolle do not hav to be lured here with lurid amounts of money. They will come for less than they could get elsewhere.
Add that basic attitude to the decades old patterm of UNC people botherd by the 'professionalism' of college sports focusing nearly 100% on football, and you develop a tradition of a lowly paid football staff.
Muschamp isn't coming to little ole UNC. For what it's worth, I think the Heels can get a much better value elsewhere.
Looks like Auburn or South Carolina have the inside track for Muschamp. UNC will
not spend the kind of money that the SEC schools will.
Auburn or little carolina
not spend the kind of money that the SEC schools will.
Auburn or little carolina
I can see both sides to this story ... some people love him , others dont ... he isnt the only name out there that can coach D ... finding an above average recruiter / solid DC is tricky ... this hire is an important one for Fedora
That 2 million figure should probably die. UNC pays the coaches in more then one way. The little over 2 million figure is all they have to admit too for the report. No need to show all the cards when a lot of ACC schools have to show none of theirs. The OC and DC made double what the report stated. That report said all the coaches except two(the two newest) made the exact same amount. The D line coach and the DC do not make the same amount a year.
Similar threads
