Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@BillyL not a day goes by that i don’t think about this stuff...we have one in elementary, middle, and high school.
Put armed security in all schools and tear down those "gun free zone" signs that have been erected and are an open invite for nut jobs like this Cruz to come in and start shooting.
BTW apparently this POS was kicked out of this school but knew the lay of the land enough to pull the fire alarm and then when the kids started exiting the school he started shooting
Makes sense to meit might be easier to just take these ar-15 rifles away from people
well apparently everyone dropped the ball at this school as this kid was a KNOWN troublemaker and actually kicked out of the school, yet he walks in and does this today
he was a head case.... his friends pointed out his love affair with guns AND bombs. Apparently his social media was chock full of violent references and youtube channels.
Good luck with taking away guns from folks, 99.999% of whom are law abiding and want to protect their families and property.
and the gov had no comment either for a 19 yr old with “issues” to have an assault weapon.
what we need to say is we’ve done everything possible to make it as easy as possible to purchase or own an assault weapon.
That haven't said exactly, but they have said it was purchased legally.How did the kid get the rifle?
it might be easier to just take these ar-15 rifles away from people
Makes sense to me
How did the kid get the rifle?
So do you guys think that will make a difference? There are more powerful weapons they could get. It's not like the AR-15 is the most dangerous weapon out there.
I wholeheartedly agree with every word of this. Let's just make it an evergreen poast every time a mass shooting happens.I don’t know what to say. The toothpaste is out of the tube and can’t be put back in. Our society has lost its way. We can ban semi auto weapons, we can make more stringent background checks, we could employ more armed school security, we could actually enforce current laws; none of it will stop what we’re seeing. At this point, I’d relinquish some rights to try but efforts would be futile. People are just f*cked up. And we’ve created these monsters in many ways - less accountability, more coddling, endorsement of entitlement mentality, obsession with violence, neglected mental health concerns, lack of faith, etc. IMO, this is just where we are and there’s no turning back. God help us.
I don't believe if these idiots thought they were going into situations [with armed school personnel] there would be as many if any.
People who commit these heinous acts are mentally ill. You're both kidding yourself if you think they can be deterred. They don't care if they die. They might kill fewer people, but it won't stop these events from happening.I can promise you, no one will go waltzing into a school knowing a dozen or more trained and armed people will be waiting there for him.
Ok, but why are they the most used for this type of thing? It's not because they are the most accurate or the most powerful. Could it be that it's more of a copy cat thing? The first person uses it, so the second person uses it, the third person uses it because the first two used it, etc. I'm just not sure how banning any kind of weapon is going to prevent this from happening. I think it's just a reactionary thought and unhelpful because it doesn't actually help anything.perhaps initially because there seem to be so many out there and those rifles are evidently the weapon of choice
Be careful with that thought. Not all of them are mentally ill and saying something like that creates a stigma about mentally ill people. Many of these people do have issues, but some are just good old fashion evil.People who commit these heinous acts are mentally ill.
i do know that the sheriff here in my county believes there is no need for anyone to own this weapon other than a police officer
Someone who chooses to slaughter innocent people is mentally ill. I don't see how this is even debatable.Be careful with that thought. Not all of them are mentally ill and saying something like that creates a stigma about mentally ill people. Many of these people do have issues, but some are just good old fashion evil.
If that is your opinion as an expert medical professional who has an intimate knowledge of every peon who has committed these crimes I won't debate it.Someone who chooses to slaughter innocent people is mentally ill. I don't see how this is even debatable.
Ok, but why are they the most used for this type of thing? It's not because they are the most accurate or the most powerful. Could it be that it's more of a copy cat thing? The first person uses it, so the second person uses it, the third person uses it because the first two used it, etc. I'm just not sure how banning any kind of weapon is going to prevent this from happening. I think it's just a reactionary thought and unhelpful because it doesn't actually help anything.
purchased legally at age 18...but to purchase a handgun the law is 21...anyone know why that’s the case if true?
perhaps initially because there seem to be so many out there and those rifles are evidently the weapon of choice...i have no idea how many are more powerful, nor do i need to know.
i do know that the sheriff here in my county believes there is no need for anyone to own this weapon other than a police officer or military personnel, and i trust his judgement.
Well, the type of weapon is a method.i can’t begin to understand why...all i know is it’s the weapon of choice in the crimes...when i think of copy cat i think of the place or the method, i don’t generally single out the specific weapon.
The plumber in my town thinks no one has the need to own a plunger other than the plumbers.
But seriously, I’m actually not as against banning certain guns as I used to be, because I’m willing to try whatever it takes to stop this madness from happening. I just hope that whatever ban is imposed is able to be changed if the statistics show that there has been no change to the amount of deaths (or worse, an increase) after the ban took effect. Because I don’t think banning assault weapons will materially change the death counts. If they can’t use a gun, they’ll make bombs. If they can’t make bombs, they mow down people with cars. These sick bastards will find a way to kill if they truly want to. We need to stop their “want to”.
Well, the type of weapon is a method.
Your sarcasm is duly noted. By all means, tell us all how these perps were all well-balanced individuals with no behavioral health issues. I could use a good laugh.If that is your opinion as an expert medical professional who has an intimate knowledge of every peon who has committed these crimes I won't debate it.
Ok, but you weren't talking about shooting vs bombing though. Your were talking about a certain type of gun. If we are going to think about banning something we need to know the thought process behind why they use it first. It's not being used because it's the most powerful or most accurate. Like @heelbent said, he could have done more damage with a shotgun (which is cheap compared to an AR-15). Getting rid of a gun isn't addressing the issue, it's just something superficial that makes us feel like we've done something.i mean shooting as opposed to bombing
I can't do that since I don't know the mental makeup of every single person who has shot someone. If you feel ok with making the assumption that you do know their makeup, then that's ok. I understand why people want to always blame mental illness. It's hard to face the fact that some people in this world are just evil and by saying they have an illness it gives us false hope that we can stop this from happening if we can just get them some help.By all means, tell us all how these perps were all well-balanced individuals with no behavioral health issues.
The plumber in my town thinks no one has the need to own a plunger other than the plumbers.
But seriously, I’m actually not as against banning certain guns as I used to be, because I’m willing to try whatever it takes to stop this madness from happening. I just hope that whatever ban is imposed is able to be changed if the statistics show that there has been no change to the amount of deaths (or worse, an increase) after the ban took effect. Because I don’t think banning assault weapons will materially change the death counts. If they can’t use a gun, they’ll make bombs. If they can’t make bombs, they mow down people with cars. These sick bastards will find a way to kill if they truly want to. We need to stop their “want to”.
Imagine if the guy had used a shotgun with an extension tube or magazine. He was going room to room shooting at groups of kids huddled in clusters in classrooms after the initial assault. A couple of rounds into each group with buck shot and you're taking out 3/4/5 people instead of one per round.
The problem isn't AR-15's. Take them away and evil idiots will find something else to use. Had the kid known how to rig those smoke bombs he could've done a lot more damage.
I've started typing about 10 different things to say on here, only to delete them all because there is really nothing new to say. We'll have the same argument that we've had about once every 3.5 weeks for the past several years and nothing will change because the people with the ability to make things change won't do anything to prevent it. We are the only developed country where this happens regularly. We have more guns per capita in this country than people. Yesterday, more people died than at Columbine, and we'll forget it by the end of the month. We've already forgotten Vegas. I could easily get shot when I go to the movies tomorrow by some person who has a problem with the fact there is a black superhero movie. So that's my piece on it.