...and this one was about where we are.
- The verdict there is not all bad by any means. As @Indy_Heel and some of the PU visitors correctly told us, they are simply deeper and more experienced than we are, and Leaky being out just reiterated our lack of backcourt depth.
- Speaking of depth, there were critical spells in both halves in which our fatigue was apparent and caused some general team lapses. The most egregious came right before the under-8. After finally getting a lead, we short-armed WIDE open shots, while they cashed in on the resulting transition opportunities, and in blink of an eye we're down 9. But then. rested after the timeout, we go on a run, but that ran outta gas eventually as well.
- It looked at first as if they were gonna just crush us inside, I was imploring our guys to "force them higher!", and to our Bigs' credit, they did, but picked up some ticky-tack (read: crappy) foul calls --- but you hafta do it. The hard part came in the second half when they were able to get entries into Williams with Garcia on his back. That was a bad formula for us.
- The good news was our commitment to block-outs, and that was big in keeping us within reach.
- Ant Harris finally got a chance for some minutes --- and proceeded to turn it over twice (sigh), but looked better once he settled in, and he's a willing defender. But speaking of defense, Kerwin trying to guard their Euro-sniper was a wildfire waiting to happen --- and, phew, it did. I mean, #55 is a handful for anyone, but you just can't play follow-the-leader around screens --- you MUST defend with your feet and recover to spots. Once Ant and/or Caleb did that, we kept him in check.
- Also, as one of the PU visitors told us, they struggle defending Stretch Bigs, and Garcia in particular took full advantage from deep. With that said, back in the day when we were spread out in the Four Corners, Dean had a rule for his Bigs --- they were only allowed to take one dribble off a catch. Thus, if they were in a corner, that kept them from ill-advised drives (well, except for James Worthy, who could take one bounce from the corner and dunk). I'd love to see Hubert insert a similar rule with Dawson.'
- Finally, with all that said, boy oh boy, nothing like bad omens to start a game --- Leaky sick and Jamie Luckie following us to Vegas -- talk about a buzz-kill, and can't say much for the rest of that crew either. Let's get real, that's not a good formula for a Big 10 hockey game, and yep, we get no FTs in the first half, and hell, I saw more illegal screens than at a porno multiplex. But as always, we have to come in knowing that and play thru it... but I'll tell ya, In particular, those aforementioned ticky-tacks hamstrung Bacot, and with him out, our post defense went south. Mando has to be able to stay on the floor longer going forward.
Anyway, back to that "identity" thing from my last "stuff" post, Purdue definitely has theirs and played well to that. We're still a work-in-progress in that sense, but the good news is there were some things today to build on as we discover ours. Just for one example, seeing our flash of playing 44 at the end reminds us that Carolina multiple defenses are still on the horizon. More immediately, let's hope the guys approach our game with Barnes' crew tomorrow with a positive attitude of taking the next step to becoming the team we can be...
- The verdict there is not all bad by any means. As @Indy_Heel and some of the PU visitors correctly told us, they are simply deeper and more experienced than we are, and Leaky being out just reiterated our lack of backcourt depth.
- Speaking of depth, there were critical spells in both halves in which our fatigue was apparent and caused some general team lapses. The most egregious came right before the under-8. After finally getting a lead, we short-armed WIDE open shots, while they cashed in on the resulting transition opportunities, and in blink of an eye we're down 9. But then. rested after the timeout, we go on a run, but that ran outta gas eventually as well.
- It looked at first as if they were gonna just crush us inside, I was imploring our guys to "force them higher!", and to our Bigs' credit, they did, but picked up some ticky-tack (read: crappy) foul calls --- but you hafta do it. The hard part came in the second half when they were able to get entries into Williams with Garcia on his back. That was a bad formula for us.
- The good news was our commitment to block-outs, and that was big in keeping us within reach.
- Ant Harris finally got a chance for some minutes --- and proceeded to turn it over twice (sigh), but looked better once he settled in, and he's a willing defender. But speaking of defense, Kerwin trying to guard their Euro-sniper was a wildfire waiting to happen --- and, phew, it did. I mean, #55 is a handful for anyone, but you just can't play follow-the-leader around screens --- you MUST defend with your feet and recover to spots. Once Ant and/or Caleb did that, we kept him in check.
- Also, as one of the PU visitors told us, they struggle defending Stretch Bigs, and Garcia in particular took full advantage from deep. With that said, back in the day when we were spread out in the Four Corners, Dean had a rule for his Bigs --- they were only allowed to take one dribble off a catch. Thus, if they were in a corner, that kept them from ill-advised drives (well, except for James Worthy, who could take one bounce from the corner and dunk). I'd love to see Hubert insert a similar rule with Dawson.'
- Finally, with all that said, boy oh boy, nothing like bad omens to start a game --- Leaky sick and Jamie Luckie following us to Vegas -- talk about a buzz-kill, and can't say much for the rest of that crew either. Let's get real, that's not a good formula for a Big 10 hockey game, and yep, we get no FTs in the first half, and hell, I saw more illegal screens than at a porno multiplex. But as always, we have to come in knowing that and play thru it... but I'll tell ya, In particular, those aforementioned ticky-tacks hamstrung Bacot, and with him out, our post defense went south. Mando has to be able to stay on the floor longer going forward.
Anyway, back to that "identity" thing from my last "stuff" post, Purdue definitely has theirs and played well to that. We're still a work-in-progress in that sense, but the good news is there were some things today to build on as we discover ours. Just for one example, seeing our flash of playing 44 at the end reminds us that Carolina multiple defenses are still on the horizon. More immediately, let's hope the guys approach our game with Barnes' crew tomorrow with a positive attitude of taking the next step to becoming the team we can be...
Last edited: