3 Stars From UNC's 2-0 Week
- By andrew jones
- Tar Heel Radar
- 0 Replies
3 Stars From UNC's 2-0 Week
North Carolina beat NC State and Virginia by a combined 39 points last week, and here are our 3 Stars from the wins
what's cool about modern bull-jumping is how it makes ancient Minoan bull-jumping myths completely credible. It isn't just bullshit.
Login to view embedded mediaA moment of silence for the racist Joy Reid being fired.![]()
No doubt man, and that what’s frustrating with HD. He’s done the scouting before and seen Roy implement those things. I guess that’s why I think he can be good at what he used to do but not relate it to the coaching side of the equation. And let’s be clear, I’m not in the majority on this either, I know, BUT I don’t mind the 5 out, I don’t mind everyone on the whole dang team being position less, and I don’t even mind a cold shooter trying to heat up. What I do mind is PLEASE for the love of all things sports, it has to work!!! I can’t type that any louder lol. I honestly don’t care who plays where or if my point guard even looks remotely what others think a pg should look like. You know what cures all angst? Winning. You win and that all of a sudden cures bellyaching, loudmouths fanatics , critics, parents, and everyone else who has an opinion. Win. That’s it. It’s amazing to me. Nobody will ever complain if you win. You’ll have an occasional person who may would like it done a little different. But I promise you the more you win the less they will roar their head too.I do agree bama, fans should not get real carried away with these last 2 wins, we were not in as big a size hole vs either and neither were high scoring offenses. But when we match up as best we can we mitigate how deep that hole is that we begin games with. How this team is constructed just puts us in that position before a game is tipped off so you must do what you can to mitigate it. I am concerned that so much of the why we beat the spread in our last 2 games depended on both JWit and Jack giving us huge scoring eruptions, both players have shown us over and over that they can erupt or they can disappear, they can play brilliant and they can go bone headed in the blink of an eye, yet to show they can be consistent.
"Hubert was a tv analyst but what made him good at it?" When Hubert joined Roy's staff both he and Roy talked about just this, what Roy saw and why Hubert felt he could help. IT was that before every game he commented on Hubert did a deep dive in to both teams, was very good at spotting things that were key to the performance of those teams, the very same trait you want breaking down game film of how your team last played as well as your next opponent. But some where along the way Hubert seemed from how he now coaches to have developed some strange notions, like playing 5 out, position-less, letting a cold shooter keep shooting so he "maybe" heats up at the end?
I do agree bama, fans should not get real carried away with these last 2 wins, we were not in as big a size hole vs either and neither were high scoring offenses. But when we match up as best we can we mitigate how deep that hole is that we begin games with. How this team is constructed just puts us in that position before a game is tipped off so you must do what you can to mitigate it. I am concerned that so much of the why we beat the spread in our last 2 games depended on both JWit and Jack giving us huge scoring eruptions, both players have shown us over and over that they can erupt or they can disappear, they can play brilliant and they can go bone headed in the blink of an eye, yet to show they can be consistent.While I do understand your disdain, 9 times out of 10 you put your best five out there. Unfortunately our best five don’t mesh and size is only a blip of the problem. Chemistry and egos none the less. No post to help out our definitely smaller guards. IMO once again people have been sucked in to a few wins against not good and terrible teams. I do get that they’ve played better and our larger lineups have done better, but against who???
Hubert was a tv analyst but what made him good at it? And even if he was good, that definitely doesn’t make him coaching material. Great man and perfect mentor for a lot of these young men but not a head coach for UNC. Just for the record, I believe that’s the first time I’ve said that, for whatever that’s worth lol. Nothing
Not sure who I despise more Va Tech or Virginia fans.nice win, i hate uva
I was about to tap out a reply to bama and glad I read your and jimmy's replies before I did, saved me some typing! You are exactly right, you do not need or even want your 5 best players to start, you want your 5 most effective players to start, you stated it really well!To me it’s about putting your most effective five on the floor the majority of the time, not necessarily your best five. This will and should necessarily change from one opponent to the next, depending on the makeup of those opponents. Hubert has not done this, he keeps trying to fit square pegs into round holes. We’ve seen the results of not game planning and failure to maximize the somewhat limited abilities of our team.
Our guys have looked more engaged and comfortable the last three games. Part of that may be playing bad teams but I attribute some to guys playing their more natural positions where their chances for success increase significantly. If there’s ever been a situation when their old saying “we can’t afford to overlook anybody” is true, it’s now.
we had another coach at carolina who was a nice fellow, great relationship skills for successful recruiting. but, by his own admission not a good tactician, didn't even call timeouts because he didn't really have anything to say. but he was successful, even a hall of famer because he put great talent on the floor. maybe hubert is like his mentor roy. hubert will get at least one more year, so we'll see....Great man and perfect mentor for a lot of these young men but not a head coach for UNC....
No way to run the counter factual but I will always believe this team would have been better by March without RJ returning. That said, yes the ball being in his hands so much will be their downfall when they regress to the mean shooting 3s and/or play decent teams. RJ is a great scorer for his size and plays as hard as anyone but he is in no way a PG, way to often stopping a break by himself, missing easy scoring plays for others inside (rewatch his best dump off yesterday and it took 3 beats too long) and dribbling the air out of possessions. The self inflicted stagnant stretches have kept and will continue to keep this team from winning tight games against plus competition.RJ has been one of my favorite players for the last 5 seasons. I think I was the first person on this board to advocate that we should recruit him. I preface my question with those observation because this is not an attack on RJ. With that preface, here's my question: Do we really need Elliot and RJ on the floor together so much?
Elliot no longer needs training wheels. And RJ's shot continues to suffer (I thought he was finally back a couple of weeks ago, but apparently I was wrong).
Yesterday's lineup worked quite well. But I suspect it would have been even more convincing if Hubert gave Elliot and Ian a couple of RJ's minutes each. Just a few, not a lot.