Caleb Wilson Chooses North Carolina
- By BCox83
- Four Corners
- 213 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Al, one of the problems is that coaches don't get as much coaching time as they used to, it is very restricted now days, not as much time to work on execution as many may think. That is why you have seen a lot of programs simplify. Not like the old days where when practice was longer and more frequent and you brought in a freshman and knew you had him for 4 years to work on learning your systems.Execution is a coaching thing .. you do it over and over and over until it's natural. This team does very few good things well. They do a lot of bad things instinctively. jmo
Not sure the reason for the LOL. I'm not talking about lack of leadership. I'm talking about kids not getting along or liking each other for some reason: personality, NIL, whatever. I also don't buy the idea that they love him but don't respect him. Perhaps the like him but ignore him, but then, that is on the players.LOL, of course there is a locker room issue, there always is on a team losing like this, there SHOULD be a locker room issue for any team with no leadership...
Know what is crystal clear, as I wrote in a post yesterday, these players all love Hubert but they simply do not respect him. You simply will not have a coach say in a PC that his players are not doing what he tells them to do and a a team that respects that coach. If they respect and trust their coach they will do what he tells them to do.
I don't really care what it signifies, lol. Seth will be a senior next season so he has one year of eligibility left (I think? I can't keep track of eligibility rules today). I can't see Elliot Cadeau being a college player for 4 years. He's already a 20 year old sophomore.Really good post, but I'm going to quibble a little about part of it.
To my eye, both EC and ST started the year much improved over the previous season. But when I look at them now, neither of them looks much improved over last season. And while ST's injury may be a factor, his fade probably began before the injury.
What does that signify? It might mean that what they focused on and learned during the off-season worked well; whereas what they've been coached to do during the season has added little if anything to their development.
I'm not saying this is necessarily Hubert's fault. Even great coaches aren't usually good at everything. But if player and team development is a weakness of this program - and I think that's becoming more obvious with every game - then in-season development is a hole in our coaching staff that needs to be filled. If Hubert can't do it, he needs to bring in someone who can.
Even a great developer may not be able to right the ship this late. But if we don't have one next season, we're never going to be as good as we look on paper.
Crazy thing is he hardly had ANY offers. I think he had 2. That's crazy for the numbers that he put up.The QB we got from VA from the tidewater area got a massive boost in ratings on TOS he is a now a 4 Star…
I think this is overcomplicating things and that's normal when your program is in a predicament like UNC's appears to be right now. This should be really simple. If the realistic candidates for this position include coaches who are better than Hubert Davis, then Hubert should not be retained. If the realistic candidates are worse, then Hubert should be the coach at UNC.Just to flip that question, should 2 losses to duke this season insure he needs to go?
My concern is that yes, Hubert has made a LOT of rookie mistakes (my opinion) but UNC hired him as a rookie head coach, rookie mistakes should have been expected. Freshman players don't come in and play like they do as seniors, same should be the expectation of a rookie head coach that has never before been a head coach of a program. We not just tolerate freshman mistakes we expect them, we know as the go along they will improve, I think that should as well be the expectation for Hubert. The time line for a coach in my view is and has to be much longer than that of a player. I really think a coach has to have a solid 10yrs of being a successful head coach before he takes on a blue blood program with VERY few exceptions, Roy and the4 current Arizona head coach being 2 rare exceptions.
It is no fun to have to endure the rookie mistakes from a player or a coach but UNC set that up by hiring Hubert, they set it up when they hired Matt as well. I would suggest that Hubert's perceived failure as a head coach today is really more based on his having a disaster of a portal season as well as what was before Wilson committed a failure in 2025 high school recruiting.
For those calling for him to be fired now, I would offer, in his very first season as UNC head coach he did coach UNC to the NCAAT title game. In his 3rd season as head coach Hubert did led his team to the ACC regular season title, was a 1 seed for the NCAAT, and was ACC coach of the year. IN addition, if bringing in talent is important to you, he did get the commit from GG Jackson who was #1 in his class I think. Hubert did bring in 2 top 10 kids that are freshmen right now in Jackson and Powell, he did just get the commit from the #5 player in the 2025 class. In addition Hubert did score 3 home runs from the portal in Manek, Ingram, and Cormac Ryan. He also scored what pretty much every GURU said were big time scores at the time he got their commits in Tyson and Dawson Garcia even thou they did not work out as basically every expert thought they would. In addition, Hubert did lead UNC to 2 of the greatest games in UNC history, hanging K with a loss to UNC in his very last game as head coach in Cameron and ending K's career with that loss to UNC in the NCAAT. That is actually a pretty darn impressive resume for not having completed his 4th season as head coach yet.
That isn't opinion, them be da facts (poor grammar purposely used to lighten the mood) that just are not up for dispute, LOL. This will or would be what other coaches that you may prefer to be the UNC coach rather than Hubert, that is what they will be looking at more than what fans want to scream out of emotion. Hope I don't need to define what the word fan is short form for...
Want to make the case for why he should go, you can save the over thinking and just go back and read what I have said for the last 3yrs, I have likely made your case for you, yet I am actually not calling for him to be fired or step down, what have I said about that? That I am waiting for the last game we play this season and then take a long hard look but for now I am inclined to bring him back for at least 1 more. I could change my mind after that last game has been played, I like everyone have changed my mind when additional information arrived. But I will tell you that my decision will not be because we lose to duke twice this season or if we miss the NCAAT.
I recognize that others feel way differently, take nothing I have shared here as being in any way disrespectful to any other opinion, I am just sharing my thoughts on this and trying to be very respectful to anyone who may not agree, I actually do think I may be in the minority opinion on this, been there before to, not my first rodeo.
The questions aren't singular specific parts of coaching that will end up being brought up over and over again.One question is whether UNC is still a strong enough draw to get the good players, regardless of coach. Doherty got good players. Hubert gets good players. Would King Rice or Wes Miller get good players?
How many kids these days say they want to be like some UNC player? Jordan is 61. Who's even seen him play?
Roy enhanced and then mostly held onto UNC's reputation, despite the NCAA cloud, COVID and his own decline. But UNC as a brand has been slipping, and this season isn't helping.