Again you get an lol. More and more government handouts. No way that would cause more and more inflation. She could write her policy stances on a bubble gum wrapper and have room left. No wonder she is the worst VP in history. Were you and
@joeydavid groomed at the same place?
she's disastrously ignorant, and lacks common sense to boot. In other words, she's a libtard.
Business can be complex in detail when it needs to be, but at the level she needs to be operating in, nothing could be simpler. You develop a product or service that you hope the buying public will desire, and provide it to them in exchange for money. Duh. The primary goal is to take in more money in sales than it takes to produce those sales. The difference between what comes in and what goes out is profit (or loss), and that's primarily the only reason one would even have a business.
I want businesses to make money, because I want them to be able to produce what I desire. I don't concern myself with how much they are making, I just decide if what they are selling is reasonably affordable to me. If it isn't, I don't buy it. If a commodity is important to me but the prices are steep, I do with less of something that is not as important. The very last thing that would cross my mind is to demand that the business sell to me at what I think is a 'fair' price.
The greater the profit the better. In order to maximize profit, you take in as much as possible and you outlay as little as possible. Duh. There is no moral limit as to how much profit is too much profit. If a company is raking it in, competition will spring up to take its share. In so doing, prices will moderate accordingly, assuming there is no collusion to fix prices. If a consumer finds the product to be unaffordable, said consumer is free to open a competing business. Free....as in freedom, the concept that we should cherish and that liberals seek to constrain.
The main sort of common sense that always seems to escape the libs is that any burden placed on a business MUST be passed on to the consumer in the form of a higher price, If the business is to remain healthy or make enough profit to justify providing the product or even just to survive.
Price gouging? It's a joke that the ignorant have even conceived of the concept. Supply and demand is the exceedingly simple concept that needs to be understood and respected by everyone before they get out of middle school.. Prices are determined by the above factors, and competition from other producers keeps them in check if the system isn't artificially manipulated by idiots sticking their commie noses where they don't belong..
So when dillweed libtards yammer away about corporations/business paying their fair share of taxes and not gouging with prices, who's to say what a fair share is and who's to say what amounts to gouging? Not Kamala Harris, she's too dumb to understand and too political to care that if you raise taxes on business so that they pay their 'fair share', you're for all intents and purposes taxing the consumer through higher prices... which you then stupidly seek to control because you declare that it's gouging.
Meanwhile, the higher that prices are driven up by liberal tinkering, the less competitive businesses are in the global market. The less competitive they are globally, the less able they are to contribute to the economy.
If you want to control inflation, just stop burdening the system with liberal idiocy. Let Trump come back and apply the common sense we need.
northcarolina.rivals.com
