We are going to put weekly commits' results in this thread.

Recruiting class rankings are nice, but what really matters is the talent and experience levels of the 2-deep depth chart. In fact, I put a limited about of data together last year, and created a regression analysis that predicts a team's winning percentage based on the talent level and the coach's lifetime winning record. The equation is:


PCT = projected team winning percentage
STUD = percent of 2-deep that is studs (0.0-1.0)
COACH = head coach's all-time winning percentage (0.0-1.0)

In order to assess the talent level, I scraped the rosters of selected teams, assembled the team's depth chart, then combed through the bios of the players. I have a criteria for what I call a "stud recruit", and by calculating the percentage of studs on a team, I can quantify the talent for the equation.

The equation is based on a small sample size, so don't go to Las Vegas based on this information, but the R-squared is 0.924 and it did predict a 0.659 winning percentage for last year's UNC team (UNC finished 9-5, or 0.643). With that, let's look at how the important teams in the ACC are shaking out this season (barring injuries):

#1 Clemson​

link
This team is absolutely loaded. In the 45 teams I've analyzed since 2016, this year's Clemson squad has the heaviest population of studs I've seen; 3% more than Alabama (2016) and 16% more than Clemson (2016). They have plenty of experience, too. Clemson's minor weaknesses are in their WR and Linebacker corps. Their O and D lines are flat out awesome. If this team misses the playoff, it will be a monumental failure on Dabo's part. I'll be surprised if the calculation is correct on this team.
Stud Percent: 74%
Projected Winning Percentage: 81%

#2 UNC​

link
This is the most talented UNC team since 2016, and has plenty of experience. Along with one of the country's best QBs, the receiver and tight end rooms are loaded. The weakness with this team is the OL. The defense, especially the DL, is loaded, but it remains to be seen if they can perform to the levels they should.
Stud Percent: 46%
Projected Winning Percentage: 63%

#3 Florida State​

link
The media is all about this FSU team, but I don't get it. They are loaded at WR, but their OL is very shaky, and the entire defense really lacks overall talent. The 2-deep has a startling number of transfers, as well. They are the most experienced team in this year's study, but the calculations show that high experience really goes against a squad (underscoring the talent deficit).
Stud Percent: 25%
Projected Winning Percentage: 58%

#4 Pittsburgh​

link
Pitt is short on studs, but they have a very solid roster across the board. The WR corps is a big question mark for this team, though. Expect them to run a lot.
Stud Percent: 31%
Projected Winning Percentage: 55%

#5 NCSU​

link
NCSU is loaded at DL, but the defensive backfield and the OL are very shaky. The real question is: can the new OC, reunited with Armstrong, make Armstrong look like a decent QB like he did at UVA?
Stud Percent: 22%
Projected Winning Percentage: 52%

Miami and Duke are also interesting teams, but I haven't had time to assemble their rosters.

Others​

South Carolina​

link
South Carolina is loaded at WR, and their DL looks solid. In fact outside of Clemson, UofSC has the best offense UNC will face in the regular season. Spencer Rattler certainly had the hype train behind him once upon a time, but last season he was merely "good". The defensive backfield, however, leaves a lot to be desired. I expect them to lose a lot of high-scoring games.
Stud Percent: 36%
Projected Winning Percentage: 54%

---

We'll see how accurate those projections are. The standard error is 17%, which is a cushion of +/- 2 wins. I think that's pretty big. Clemson's toughest games will be FSU, @NCSU, Notre Dame, UNC, and @UofSC. Will they lose 2 of those? Maayyybe. It will have to come down to something like turnovers or FG kicking for them to lose 2, in my opinion.

What are people's thoughts on FSU? I am not believing that roster.

Opens this way: While uncertainty rules the ACC's long-term future, the outlook on the field this season seems relatively clear: Florida State and Clemson look like the class of the conference.

Adelson picks UNC 3rd, and Hale picks UNC 5th, behind Pitt and Moo.

AJ, you at the scrimmage tonight?

August is generally one of the slowest if not the slowest month of the year. Recruiting hits a lull between the AAU season and the fall visits. Now is a perfect time to catch our breaths and do a mailbag. Hit me with your questions.

And the reason is conference instability. We have a coach inching toward age 75, who has definitely underachieved at UNC his second go around in all things but recruiting, and who has not won a truly big game since 2009. UNC needs to be clicking at high level right now, with a most promising future. But we have most fans uncertain about whether this team can finish ranked as it starts the season. And that is not Top 10. It's possible (many would, say probable) that Mack can have had the two best QBs in UNC history and fail to achieve much of anything with them.

If UNC had built the football program it should have a long time ago, the ACC would not today be in nearly as precarious a position even with the same exact membership. But look where we are.

Sponsored by: @Andy MyPerfectFranchise.Net**

*Hate your job?

*Hate your boss?

*Ready to take control of your career?

Call Andy Luedecke to learn more. Consultation is FREE, and he can help you find your perfect franchise. He did it for himself. Dumpster & porta potties are two of his franchises, and so many different things can be yours.

Find Your Perfect Franchise at MyPerfectFranchise.Net. Contact Andy Luedecke anytime at aluedecke@myperfectfranchise.net or (404) 973-9901.