Am I wrong to think this way?
- Thread starter Tigertown_a_Rick
- Start date
I'll accuse a ref of being biased or corrupt when I see said ref caught in a gambling scandal. Until then I may not agree with calls, but I'll associate it with human error.
There must be illegal contact for a moving screen to be a foul; no illegal contact, no foul, no matter how much moving the screener does.
The Committee can put studs or stiffs in your potential way... That is how Dook won it in 2010 (imo). Most surely you have not forgotten that gift...!
Just curious. Do you think K's constant berating of the officials causes him to get more calls in dook's favor?
Thanks for that. Not sure what I did to deserve it. I stated an opinion and have not insulted anyone. Is it because I'm not straight out of Compton?
Yeah. Several on here have no concept of the real world.
UR Serious? He couldn't block the shot because he was 8 feet away!
4 feet away from archie who was 4 feet away from Jenkins.
CC
Ha. OK please tell me which of the following is true:
1. You are trolling. Considering the subject matter and the board it is not very funny.
2. You are serious and are one of those types that don't believe facts when they see them with their own eyes. Shorter description: Cruz or Trump?
3. You are serious but have not seen a single replay of the shot after you smashed the TV Monday night. I'd say go watch the replay and then let me know what you think.
CC
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
are you serious? You and your don't blame the refs fan boy club keep taking jabs at people for stating their opinion, but ya can't take it when jabs are thrown at you? GMAFB. Someone decided to make a thread to get his frustation out without reading other threads. What's the big deal? I don't care if other people have talked about the refs, he hasn't.
nope, not really. A picture is a picture. It has 0 words. Do you see imaginary captions?
uhhh u do know he was responding to a meme dont u?
Anyway there einstein its called sarcasm. You boys going all huckleberry and gettin personal over getting called out was just as predictable as your posts after the game. But anyway Its been quite entertaining. So no, i am not serious. Well actually now i am. But i wasnt then. Maybe.
Last edited:
Don't care how you saw it unfold t all... Hicks still ALMOST got to the shooter and either blocked or altered the shot. That is what I saw and believe. Some may see it differently. Don't really care too much. Moving screens are moving screens. Contact (when even slight) is still contact. Puck-Chuck, do you really think tht was the only questionable, absolutely WRONG CALL/ No Call that went against UNC?
OK
Hicks did his best but it's hard to make up that much distance that fast. That fact that Berry partially screened him didn't help. BTW that was his only contact with another player during the play.
Both true but neither apply in this case.
Not saying that at all. If you read my original post you will see that I was frustrated by some of the calls. But when you state that you saw x number of bad calls and then say the last shot was a bad call I have to question the other plays you consider incorrect.
CC
Dude if you're looking for rational discussion on the officiating u wont find it here. You're more likely to find people who agree with u that elvis paid off the officials than the bizarre notion that they just sucked and didnt have an agenda.
2. I think you meant Hildabeast or Ancient Bernie as in how they think we can pay for all the giveaways. Better yet stick to Canadian politics.
You post a meme of a guy beating a dead horse, yet you continue to be belabor the same point ad nauseum. You are nothing if not predictable. Don't like this discussion? Stay off the thread.
Actually the meme was referring to blaming the officials for losing. Laughing at the idea is still fresh. Dont like it? Hit ignore.
It's your tired old conspiracy schtick once again. It dominates your discussions on this board.
And the thing is that doesn't really bother me as much. But a moving screen? Just as valid as calling a blocking foul on Hicks.
CC
Yea i should prob call people that disagree with me teenage girls. Now THATS original.
If Heelman ever has an original thought, it will be his first. He's just a cool clique sycophant.
Similar threads
