I agree with some of this, but Berry is the only one that could hit a shot outside of ten feet..he hit some crucial shots! The three towards the end being the most important...he had 22 and 6! I have to say that offensively Berry did carry us! Jackson and pinson played great defensively, as did Meeks down low, but without Berry we don't get close to winning that game
Don't get me wrong, Berry was a big part of our win, and I'm a huge Berry fan overall. But Berry was our "least bad" offensive player against Gonzaga, and frankly he was just bad against Oregon.
Against Oregon he scored 11 points on 0-6 from 2, 2-8 from 3, and 5-9 from the line. That's bad. But Meeks and Jackson carried us through.
Against Gonzaga he scored 22 points on 3-6 from 2, 4-13 from 3, and 4-8 from the line. But we shot historically poorly from 3 as a team (4-27 !!!), so his offensive performance looks better by comparison. But it hardly showed he was a clear-cut All-American. If Jackson doesn't shoot 0-9 from 3, he wins MOP easily.
If we take Berry off the team, we most likely don't win - true. But the same was just as true - if not more so - for Jackson and Meeks.
None of this is meant to disparage Berry. He was clearly playing hurt. He clearly wasn't nearly as good as he was during the year because of his ankles.
But that's kinda the point. We won despite the fact that Berry was hidden on defense and was mostly a spot-up shooter on offense. Because our defense in the tournament was
phenomenal. It was Gonzaga's worst offensive performance of their entire season by a comfortable margin. If Pinson and Jackson don't shut down elite guards and wings, we're not having this conversation, because we lose to Kentucky.
Again, my only point is this: You can make a good argument for Berry as a first-team AA this year. But "FF MOP" is not that argument.