I assume he meant Bender from Futurama, @carolinablue34's avatar. If someone was trashing the Simpsons, I would have been all over him.Who trashed the Simpsons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I assume he meant Bender from Futurama, @carolinablue34's avatar. If someone was trashing the Simpsons, I would have been all over him.Who trashed the Simpsons?
Oh yeah. Lots of parts. Bound to find combinations that work.David Noel is another candidate that stepped up. That season looked a lot like this season. Quality freshman coming in and veterans that did next to nothing stepping up. David Noel averaged 3.9pts and 2.6 reb the previous season. The next 12.9 and 7. There was also a similar Junior on that team that stepped up and made some huge shots for us. Small slow Wes Miller filled a role for us as a shooter that year that I think Platek can fill as well, and maybe better since he is at least 5 inches taller than Miller. Walker Miller may also be a player that gets a run. He can really shoot the ball and as a stretch 4 he could create some space in the paint for Cole and Bacot/Garrison to make us pretty dangerous. That eliminates our need of Pierce to play out of position at the 4 and fills the depth at 3. Fact is...we are on here jabbing each other and trashing the Simpsons (which is a horrible thing to do btw) and 99% of the teams would love to have the embarrassment of riches we have. Gonna be a fun season and if everyone on the team can be okay with the PT situation, I am sure ROY will (as he always does) put us in a position to be very successful.
Made me scroll back to find that signature.0910 I try hard not to respond directly to peeps since it often leads to an unnecessary back and forth, BUT please consider changing your signature line because it is not the Family Way. D, G-7, and some others can be annoying due to the strength of their opinions, but they are also true Tar Heels and just want to debate Tar Heel topics. I think you fall into the same category (as I often do), but the sig is an off putting personal attack that distracts from your points.
Meanwhile back at the topic: ZW is still considering the Heels from all I have heard, but it may not be the lock it once was. In either case, The Heels are sitting pretty with some serious firepower and the future is bright!
I modified it, but I don't plan to completely remove it. @DSouthr has had a problem with me before when I don't say IMO, so that should remind him that I do post opinions without saying IMO everytime. Not sure why everyone keeps bringing up Gary. My opinion on Platek and my response to Dave had nothing to do with Gary. He apparently just chose to assume it did and apparently that triggered him.0910 I try hard not to respond directly to peeps since it often leads to an unnecessary back and forth, BUT please consider changing your signature line because it is not the Family Way. D, G-7, and some others can be annoying due to the strength of their opinions, but they are also true Tar Heels and just want to debate Tar Heel topics. I think you fall into the same category (as I often do), but the sig is an off putting personal attack that distracts from your points.
Meanwhile back at the topic: ZW is still considering the Heels from all I have heard, but it may not be the lock it once was. In either case, The Heels are sitting pretty with some serious firepower and the future is bright!
Your avatar is not what you should modify, it is your lacking in the ability to respectfully discuss a topic that is and has been in dire need of modification. Yeah, all you offer is your opinion and yet you consistently show that you consider your opinion to be unquestionable fact and it is never that. Those like myself that that do not agree with your opinion you consistently seem to need to talk down to, to belittle. So I fed you a little of that back just so you could taste what you seem so willing to dish out. So que up one of your passive aggressive retorts or your favorite go to when it comes to me that I write more than your attention span allows you to read...LOLI modified it, but I don't plan to completely remove it. @DSouthr has had a problem with me before when I don't say IMO, so that should remind him that I do post opinions without saying IMO everytime. Not sure why everyone keeps bringing up Gary. My opinion on Platek and my response to Dave had nothing to do with Gary. He apparently just chose to assume it did and apparently that triggered him.
I very rarely post on radar, so basically everything you just said is BS. I have a feeling that you are confusing me with @carolinablue34 because there hasn't been any discussion about my avatar and I can assure you that I'm never passive aggressive. Put me on ignore since you obviously don't have the ability to tell what an opinion is.Your avatar is not what you should modify, it is your lacking in the ability to respectfully discuss a topic that is and has been in dire need of modification. Yeah, all you offer is your opinion and yet you consistently show that you consider your opinion to be unquestionable fact and it is never that. Those like myself that that do not agree with your opinion you consistently seem to need to talk down to, to belittle. So I fed you a little of that back just so you could taste what you seem so willing to dish out. So que up one of your passive aggressive retorts or your favorite go to when it comes to me that I write more than your attention span allows you to read...LOL
nice man very nice still laughing 5 minutes laterIf I'm understanding someone is saying if Platek gets a ton of minutes we are in trouble, then Mike says he has heard that before. Then a third party supporter of Mike says, "you can't tell Mike what to say!". Then Mike insinuates the guy may get banned!
Then a commercial break happened, so I stopped paying attention.
Ah. Yes, I wouldn't mind rounding out our class with Davis and Walton. Both look like good multi-year additions to me. Either might develop into a starter, especially Davis. Not OAD, but good foundation players.Sorry, Walton.
I think there are three real potential outcomes for this class:Ah. Yes, I wouldn't mind rounding out our class with Davis and Walton. Both look like good multi-year additions to me. Either might develop into a starter, especially Davis. Not OAD, but good foundation players.
Ah. Yes, I wouldn't mind rounding out our class with Davis and Walton. Both look like good multi-year additions to me. Either might develop into a starter, especially Davis. Not OAD, but good foundation players.
Yes please.Pussy Galore??
I don’t want the turnover that would probably come from a #1 class. I’d prefer a four star wing like Puff, don’t want to see a OAD carousel every year.Without a doubt. They are the sort of guys Roy excels with, especially if they are along with these more elite types we now seem to be getting. It would be nice to have a ridiculously elite class as well though. See what Roy could do with something like that.
I agree Arch, and I do think Roy is looking to round out the class with a 3-4 yr player or two... I do hope he snags Zaire too!….I don’t want the turnover that would probably come from a #1 class. I’d prefer a four star wing like Puff, don’t want to see a OAD carousel every year.
I doubt that Kessler, Sharpe, and Love are all one and done, almost certainly not all three, but stranger things have happened.Yes please.
I don’t want the turnover that would probably come from a #1 class. I’d prefer a four star wing like Puff, don’t want to see a OAD carousel every year.
If we win a natty you could see all three go but if not prbably see them back. I can live with thatI doubt that Kessler, Sharpe, and Love are all one and done, almost certainly not all three, but stranger things have happened.
LOLI very rarely post on radar, so basically everything you just said is BS. I have a feeling that you are confusing me with @carolinablue34 because there hasn't been any discussion about my avatar and I can assure you that I'm never passive aggressive. Put me on ignore since you obviously don't have the ability to tell what an opinion is.
Yes please.
I don’t want the turnover that would probably come from a #1 class. I’d prefer a four star wing like Puff, don’t want to see a OAD carousel every year.
No, The Dock's Of Both; Ziaire, & Cade Is Still Open To Carolina, Bryce's Too, We Haven't Wrapped Up Our Class, And We Will Still Land 2 Other 5 Stars; Ziaire Williams & Cade Cunningham, & Bryce Thompson; GO HEELS!!!It does seem the ship is starting to leave the dock in regards to Ziaire. Hopefully we can get a quality 3 and a quality 2. We need both, but they do not need to be 5 start, one and done types. Our class is already strong, but we do need 2 wings still.
Coach Roy & His Staff Isn't Letting Off The Efforts On Ziaire & Cade, & Will Land Both; Plus Bryce Thompson; GO HEELS!!!Yeah, I would LOVE to see us finish out with Bryce and Puff but if CC wants to come I take him in a heart beat!
I think it’s USC but what do I know?So it is either UNC, USC, or Stanford. No surprise there.
About zero chance in that.Coach Roy & His Staff Isn't Letting Off The Efforts On Ziaire & Cade, & Will Land Both; Plus Bryce Thompson; GO HEELS!!!
Doesn't really matter if I agree with you or not, I do enjoy your positive belief and for me that trumps what I may think will happen! Want to thank you for that.Coach Roy & His Staff Isn't Letting Off The Efforts On Ziaire & Cade, & Will Land Both; Plus Bryce Thompson; GO HEELS!!!
Our Front Court will really open up the floor next year with Sharpe, Kessler, Brooks and hopefully a healthy Sterling and possibly Bacot. I would hope and think that the guards that we are recruiting know how much better their positions will be with this infrastructure