https://ig.ft.com/sites/brexit-polling/Point me to one Brexit poll that had Leave ahead within 60 days to 1 week before vote
https://ig.ft.com/sites/brexit-polling/Point me to one Brexit poll that had Leave ahead within 60 days to 1 week before vote
Didn't pay that much attention to them in the primaries, but it seemed a lot of them showed that he would win as voting day got closer. The media is who said he wouldn't win. That being said, couldn't I say the same thing about the daily tracking polls that you cited?
You realize that poll never shows Leave ahead until the last week, right?
Asking the same people everyday isn't that great of a measure. How many times in the past 90 days would you have voted for Hilary instead of Trump? Same question for @UNC '92 and @gunslingerdick . @strummingram, @BillyL, @chick_bleeds_carolina_blue how many times in the past 90 days would you have voted for Trump instead of Hilary?No. the USC poll in particular asks the same people each day.
Read the methodology.
In fact, the methodology differs for all polls. The WSJ one you cited had 18.7% more Democrats than Republicans. Why is anyone surprised they have Hilldawg in the lead?
Guess we are looking at different links, because those polls show it going back and forth. Scroll down to middle of page and take a look at May.You realize that poll never shows Leave ahead until the last week, right?
Asking the same people everyday isn't that great of a measure. How many times in the past 90 days would you have voted for Hilary instead of Trump? Same question for @UNC '92 and @gunslingerdick . @strummingram, @BillyL, @chick_bleeds_carolina_blue how many times in the past 90 days would you have voted for Trump instead of Hilary?
Right, because the New York Times is the only journalistic endeavor with no Clinton bias.
I'm so scared Trump die-hards are gonna go off the deep end in a few weeks.
Perfection. To have to ask is to exhibit the thing itself.It's something you participate in so just leave it alone. You'll never get it.
Nowhere. They're champions of racial equality, gender equality, sexual orientation and all kinds of social choice. Conservatives are always making sure new ideas are brought to the forefront. My bad.discrimination where??
Most of my family lives in Southern VA, south of Richmond. They add-up to about 40 plus people, give or take in all. And, it's about 70% democrat, 30% republican. They all like Kaine, apparently.Northern Virginia is heavy democrat, along with the Richmond and Hampton Roads areas . . I've seen no support whatsoever for Trump here in NoVa.
If, Trump himself thought he had any chance here he would not have pulled his ads.
Heard on the radio today that Trump is only polling at 29% here in the Commonwealth . .
Most of my family lives in Southern VA, south of Richmond. They add-up to about 40 plus people, give or take in all. And, it's about 70% democrat, 30% republican. They all like Kaine, apparently.
If shit wasn't rigged, it would be Bernie vs. Trump right now. Ask the good folks of Arizona.
Leave really took off when Odumbo went over and told them they should vote to stay.You realize that poll never shows Leave ahead until the last week, right?
You think so? I dunno. I just don't think a majority of Americans are ready to go to his level of how government should be run. I could be wrong.And Bernie would probably be 20 points ahead of Trump by now.
Guess we are looking at different links, because those polls show it going back and forth. Scroll down to middle of page and take a look at May.
Ok, I see where the difference is. You are talking about betting odds/chance of winning and I was talking about the head to head numbers.You are looking at it wrong. All of May had Remain ahead.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-disastrous-week-of-campaigning-a7368196.html
Ok, I see where the difference is. You are talking about betting odds/chance of winning and I was talking about the head to head numbers.
Ok, the way I'm looking at it is that the highlighted number is the number in the lead. I searched for another one and found an aggregate one on WSJ. It looks like stay was either in the lead by a small amount or tied for most of May, but there was a switch around the beginning of June.No. In the FT link you posted showing poll data, Remain was ahead entirely through May.
I just added that other link this morning to show that bookies are seeing exactly the same pattern on this election as they saw with Brexit.
Ok, the way I'm looking at it is that the highlighted number is the number in the lead. I searched for another one and found an aggregate one on WSJ. It looks like stay was either in the lead by a small amount or tied for most of May, but there was a switch around the beginning of June.
http://graphics.wsj.com/brexit-whos-voting-what/
Ok, I see where the difference is. You are talking about betting odds/chance of winning and I was talking about the head to head numbers.
@UNC71-00 and I finally came to an agreement, but thanks for bringing it back up like a dick.I'm not getting in the middle of this pissing contest
Technically it was multiple pollsthan I do some random poll
Also, water is wet.Polls can be manipulated and even outright fictionalized in order to show what the presenter wants it to show.
@UNC71-00 and I finally came to an agreement, but thanks for bringing it back up like a dick.
I bet you do.I do what I can. The point being I trust people who will back their stated percentages monetarily.