Boy Scout's...err Girl Scout's....err

[gunslingerdick]

If this person does a good job as mayor then she should be re-elected. If not move on and elect someone else but don't cry homophobe and all that BS.

He/she could be the worst Mayor of all time but of course the left will cry foul if he/she isn't re-elected.

 

[KramerDishDawg84]

I don't personally believe that people are "straight" or "gay" anymore than I believe they're "liberal or conservative." They have preferences and typical behaviors, but they're never one or the other all the time. I think I recall reading where, in Roman culture, people who were completely heterosexual and completely homosexual were considered the "freaks" of the society. And, in a sense, that was correct because they do comprise the extreme minority of the demographic.

Of course, in our society, it's finally being put aside. But, I know when I was a kid, the worst thing a boy could be called was a fagg*t. That was a potentially serious blow to the ego, right there!

What happened to the Roman Empire? Just curious...

 

[KramerDishDawg84]

I'm not sure if conservatism is the right term. I'm not sure that it's a political perspective.

Rejecting and resisting the evolution of the human species can be considered a mental illness. Mental illness is pretty subjective.

The theory of evolution is based on natural selection to advance and maintain the species. Since procreation is impossible with homosexuality, it follows that homosexuality is NOT evolution. Aberration is more appropriate.

When two women or two men produce offspring through natural sexual means with no outside intervention, then you can toss the evolution card. Until then, best to keep that card in your hand.

 

[strummingram]

What happened to the Roman Empire? Just curious...

It over - extended itself by trying to rule/conquer the world. The culture was very advanced and it advanced society in general. It collapsed from trying to take over the world.

 

[strummingram]

The theory of evolution is based on natural selection to advance and maintain the species. Since procreation is impossible with homosexuality, it follows that homosexuality is NOT evolution. Aberration is more appropriate.

When two women or two men produce offspring through natural sexual means with no outside intervention, then you can toss the evolution card. Until then, best to keep that card in your hand.

I'm not talking about "The Theory of Evolution." I'm talking about the actual evolution and progression of the world and the species. I already showed scientific data that explains, in detail, how sexual arousal and gratification isn't specific about "opposite sex" anatomy in order to fulfill that proclivity. It may seem abnormal, but abnormal is relative. It's what we use to measure "normal" against. And, that is always changing... evolution.

And, as far as procreation, it could very well be that nature/God/The Universe brings the predisposition or preference of same-sex behavior back into abundance in order to balance the population. It's pretty clear that humans, because of their own preference for greed, have too many people for the resources and results of their labor. If it's getting too over-populated, then homosexual behavior will lower the numbers. Attraction, sexual pleasure, and the emotions to share affection and love are not likely to go away. People who are offended by what kind of genitalia they have and judge them for it "not being the right genitalia" are just going to have to be offended, I guess. That's their choice. Fortunately, we are EVOLVING beyond stoning, burning, killing people who are an "aberration."

 

[KramerDishDawg84]

I'm not talking about "The Theory of Evolution." I'm talking about the actual evolution and progression of the world and the species. I already showed scientific data that explains, in detail, how sexual arousal and gratification isn't specific about "opposite sex" anatomy in order to fulfill that proclivity. It may seem abnormal, but abnormal is relative. It's what we use to measure "normal" against. And, that is always changing... evolution.

And, as far as procreation, it could very well be that nature/God/The Universe brings the predisposition or preference of same-sex behavior back into abundance in order to balance the population. It's pretty clear that humans, because of their own preference for greed, have too many people for the resources and results of their labor. If it's getting too over-populated, then homosexual behavior will lower the numbers. Attraction, sexual pleasure, and the emotions to share affection and love are not likely to go away. People who are offended by what kind of genitalia they have and judge them for it "not being the right genitalia" are just going to have to be offended, I guess. That's their choice. Fortunately, we are EVOLVING beyond stoning, burning, killing people who are an "aberration."

Ah, so this "evolution" you speak of is only your opinion with no proven scientific ties.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

 

[nctransplant]

Ah, so this "evolution" you speak of is only your opinion with no proven scientific ties.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

Strum sleeps at the Holiday Inn

 

[strummingram]

Ah, so this "evolution" you speak of is only your opinion with no proven scientific ties.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

Well, it's evolution that is happening all the time. We're evolving all the time. So, yeah, there are "scientific ties"... it's all happening now.

 

[KramerDishDawg84]

Well, it's evolution that is happening all the time. We're evolving all the time. So, yeah, there are "scientific ties"... it's all happening now.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

 

[strummingram]

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

I know it does.