Hey Y'all ... regarding, for example, the Tez Walker case. Perhaps this is too obvious (and/or I'm naive) but I haven't heard anyone talking about this possibility. With all of the legal gambling going on now ... what is the possibility that boosters from a rival school (perhaps a rich rival ... like dook) paid enough people from the NCAA committee to deny eligibility to Tez? Maybe this booster bet a bazilion dollars that UNC wouldn't win the conference (or something to that effect) so they don't want Tez playing. Since the committee doesn't have to justify their decision can't they just say "no" to Tez, and take their money, and noone ever knows anything?