We'll see if you pay up.
Nuk, you will agree that we are in new, uncharted territory with Trump? IMO no one on either side has ever come close to being this bad for the country. Yes, I know the stock market is doing great,,,I didn't say ver Nixon shouldn't have resigned due to Watergate. I said the negative press started from the very beginning of his presidency in 1969. And, every GOP POTUS since then has faced the same on-slaught from liberal MSM - Nixon, Reagan, GHW Bush, GW Bush, and now Trump.
Nuk, you will agree that we are in new, uncharted territory with Trump? IMO no one on either side has ever come close to being this bad for the country. Yes, I know the stock market is doing great,,,
I understand what you’re saying. I don’t agree, but that’s OkI'm against the criminalization and psychiatrist-ization of political differences, disagreements, policies, management styles or approaches to governing.
How are your investments doing right now? Although my IRAs and 401Ks have been doing great for the last 14 months, I understand that could evaporate very quickly, especially if the DUMs get what they want - a nullification of the 2016 election result by any and all means necessary.
Look, Trump is not a career politician that has been bought and sold by powerful individuals and special interests. That alone represents a shock and a threat to the current political system which, in my opinion, is corrupt to the core. Just consider and look back on the leaks (which are now being investigated and the leakers will be prosecuted) by some of the highest level civil servants in the government, many of whom are in the intelligence community, FBI, and DOJ.
The Deep State (yes, it exists and is still alive and well...) is doing everything it can to get rid of Trump too because he is a threat to their status quo. And, there are still many in place like Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, James Baker, Lisa Page, James Ohr and James Comey - many of whom are beholden to their DUM party benefactors - who will continue to try to undermine Trump at every turn even if it involves illegal and/or unethical conduct in the work place.
And, yes - there evidently were (maybe still are...) a number of people in Trump's inner circle who were of like mind and worked to embarrass and undermine him from the beginning. Sean Spicer and Reince Preibus come to mind... And, Steve Bannon has been and will continue to be the village idiot who will burn down anyone and everything to get his way. Trump rejected that approach and did not adopt many of Bannon's ideas while Bannon was still in the WH. No wonder Bannon said the things in Wolff's book. And, no wonder Trump got rid of Bannon. JMHO.
I believe he said "Washington outsider" but don't let reality and truth get in your way.Huh? He wasn't that much of a political outsider. He did previously serve two terms as Governor of California, after all.
I know for a fact what he said was "Reagan wasn't considered a statesman by the MSM or DEMs when he was elected," which is what I was commenting on, Buttinski.I believe he said "Washington outsider" but don't let reality and truth get in your way.
And, his administration was loaded with felons and crooks.DEMs and the MSM did not consider Reagan a statesman at any time before or during his first term. They thought he was dangerous, unstable and incapable - especially when it came to the nuclear stand-off with the USSR.
All administrations are. They might not be held accountable for their actions, but you can't throw a stone in Washington without hitting a crook.And, his administration was loaded with felons and crooks.
Well, I can't help that Reagan's administration was loaded with crooks that were too stupid to not get caught. I showed the stats from the administrations going back to JFK. I was a little shocked myself. The Republicans are the Champions, by a long shot.All administrations are. They might not be held accountable for their actions, but you can't throw a stone in Washington without hitting a crook.
Do you even know what a statesman is? Apparently not.DEMs and the MSM did not consider Reagan a statesman at any time before or during his first term. They thought he was dangerous, unstable and incapable - especially when it came to the nuclear stand-off with the USSR.
What you're saying is that Democrats and the media were too stupid to tell the difference back then. Yeah, that sounds about like the condescending Nuk[e] we've all come to know.It didn't matter that Reagan actually WAS statesman-like. The DEMs and the MSM at the TIME did not consider him TO BE a statesman.
Were you just as clueless in the 1980s as you are today? I suspect the answer is a resounding yes!Anyone like me who actually lived through the 1980 POTUS election and Reagan's first term knows the truth. Those who weren't even an itch in their drag queen daddy's twat try to argue otherwise.
Yeah Vicente Fox is an authority on immigration. Get caught on the Mexican side of the border illegally.
Four or five states in Mexico have been issued level 4 travel warnings due to Mexican cartel violence - kidnappings, murder, beheadings, politicians abducted and murdered along with their families... SHIT HOLES!Yeah Vicente Fox is an authority on immigration. Get caught on the Mexican side of the border illegally.
Interesting that Papadapoulas was not on Clapper's radar. Never mentioned under-oath by ANYONE in public or private Congressional testimony... Yet, his drunken musings to an Australian diplomat about how he knew the Russians had dirt on $RC was somehow the catalyst that sparked the Russian investigation - NOT the dodgy dossier??? Sure. If you really believe that I have some ocean front property in New Mexico I'll sell you...