Fake Nunes . . .
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
It's a bullshit memo . . that's his point. Written only to help 45's desperate move to run away from Mueller's investigation. It's not real hard to figure out why . .
Post a link that the FBI said the memo was factual . . I call bullshit on that claim.
Lol what they actually said was the entire thing was a farce and made crucial material omissions that completely changed the narrative of the memo. Which isn't surprising since this was a 110% political document written by the republicans.
This is pretty much the same thing as when Christians cite the Bible as evidence of their religion. You can't just write a story then cite your story as evidence that what you wrote is true. Fukkin morons
Yes if try to say the FBI said the opposite of what they actually said then I will gladly point out that error.
If you keep acting like morons then I'm going to keep calling you morons. Maybe imbecile would be more accurate in your case, seeing as you apparently aren't capable of reading an entire poast.
They have a majority on this board and they know it. That provides them the social insulation to feel comfortable with that spin. I say let them have it. This is their one chance to blow off steam, because in every other facet of life, people are getting openly mocked for supporting this clown. I've seen some of them even admit they're too nervous to admit they pulled the lever for him at work or around family etc. Frankly, they probably should be.
Truth hurts. Your collusion narrative has been destroyed. You and your idiot liberal buddies have spent the better part of the past year spinning this web of lies and it has now started to come down around your head. Go to hell.
I was going to say the same thing. There are obviously republicans on this board, but no one as crazy as him. He's the black sheep on this board.
I never said they're stealing jobs. I just said my beef is with the ones who come here and don't get jobs.
"To the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower," Gowdy said. "The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos' meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice."
~ Trey Gowdy
~ Trey Gowdy
I think it's different for each one. Some will be criminals, others use government funding, some just clog up infrastructure - but they're not contributing much of value if they don't have a job.
Just noticed this question. Basically I feel like it's a violation of the fourth amendment. Spying on America citizens approved by a secret court using questionable standards to get it approved just seems wrong to me. I've also never been a big fan of the patriot act which expanded the FISA power a lot. Here is a good article that kind of explains how I feel. It's talking about the Nunes memo, but I think it's applicable to the larger discussion.
Wait until Trump releases the Dem memo . . I doubt he does, because the Nunes memo it is all politically motivated . . you'll understand all this BS a little better after the corrected version surfaces (tho I doubt it does).
The dem's version won't change my mind about the FISA court. I haven't read the Nunes' memo yet, because I know it's just a political thing and it's not going to provide me with any important information. My problem with FISA existed long before this memo and I haven't been a fan of the patriot act from almost the moment it was enacted. It's not a political thing for me, it's a constitutional issue and it has been for over a decade.
It has to be political, in the fact it is responding to something already political . .
Jus' saying . .
I agree 100% But I also agree with what @tarheel0910 is saying about the FISA system.It has to be political, in the fact it is responding to something already political . .
Jus' saying . .
Well, I won't read that one for the same reasons I didn't read the GOP one. I know some people might think I only started having a problem with it because it's Trump, but that's not true. I would say the exact same thing if this was happening to a democrat. I think there isn't much difference between FISA and what the NSA was doing. Both Bush and Obama (and Trump will, if he hasn't already) have abused the government's surveillance powers.
Looks like there were as many women there as Trumps inauguration.Women . . the great communicators:
We could easily test 20, even 30 for as fast as we went up. I know this sounds counter intuitive, but I would like to see a huge correction to build a better base for future growth.
