ADVERTISEMENT

Good, bad, ugly vs VT?

blazers

Hall of Famer
Oct 8, 2001
12,336
4,958
113
I'd say:
Good - Defensive rotation. The D wasn't very good first half, but being able to rotate lots of players will pay dividends in future games and seasons.

Bad - Sam still doesn't understand the concept of negative yardage or throwing it away.

Ugly - pass protection. I don't know if it was unseasoned rbs or missing starting center or OL getting dinged and rotating players. But we made VT D look stellar.

(Bonus, Great - Conley is badazz, saved that gm from being a blow out.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe
i don’t understand why both lines cannot do their job with any consistency.

It is extremely frustrating.

I think the DL will make progress as most of our big bodies are Fr or Soph. Might see a little more 4-man fronts if the starters can't hang.

We made need to make a Dwayne Ledford type of hire to fix the OL though.
 
Last edited:
Bad: The Heels only scored 10 points. That hasn't happened since the Miami game in Fedora's last season when we were 2-10 or whatever!

UNC is in deep doo-doo if it can't score a lot of points.
 
Good- The Heels won't meet Alabama in a bowl game this season. Bama would put something on the Heels that a case of comet wouldn't take off.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tarheel0910
The Dawgs almost shut them out.

Not having Etienne and Lawrence, and an Oline hurts. UGA looks pretty damn good, too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT