Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, back when world slave trade was gearing up, i'd say most white people were luckier than certain black people. Solid deductive skills you got there.So white people aren’t racist? They’re just luckier than blacks.
Glad that’s settled.
Yes, back when world slave trade was gearing up, i'd say most white people were luckier than certain black people. Solid deductive skills you got there.
Settled, so what else can we look at from a race-oriented lens?
Race is important, it just isn't the first thing I think of and post when I read an article that makes no mention of race.I’d argue the black Africans that sold their own people were the luckiest of them all. No?
lol. Now the crybaby liberals got their way and race is no longer important...until you liberal fu*ks decide again that it is.
Race is important, it just isn't the first thing I think of and post when I read an article that makes no mention of race.
Glad that it is top-o-mind for you and other social justice warriors though.
What is the point of this thread?
clearly the point is race
I found the study and it's findings interesting and wanted to share it with people who would somehow relate it to race.What is your point in poasting this thread?
I found the study and it's findings interesting and wanted to share it with people who would somehow relate it to race.
back when world slave trade was gearing up, the great majority of slaves were white. Does that affect your narrative at all? Didn't think so.Yes, back when world slave trade was gearing up, i'd say most white people were luckier than certain black people. Solid deductive skills you got there.
Settled, so what else can we look at from a race-oriented lens?
Link...back when world slave trade was gearing up, the great majority of slaves were white. Does that affect your narrative at all? Didn't think so.
if you need a link, you're dumber and more uneducated than you probably look. Read a history book. Just because Americans traded in African slaves doesn't mean slaves were historically African. Slaves were normally taken from conquered or controlled peoples and there wasn't that much conquering being done in the interior of Africa, other than by other Africans...and that market to the outside wasn't developed for a long time.Link...
The time period you are referring to was before the ”world slave trade gearing up”. IMO.if you need a link, you're dumber and more uneducated than you probably look. Read a history book. Just because Americans traded in African slaves doesn't mean slaves were historically African. Slaves were normally taken from conquered or controlled peoples and there wasn't that much conquering being done in the interior of Africa, other than by other Africans...and that market to the outside wasn't developed for a long time.
convenient opinion, and convenient definition of 'world slave trade'. The world slave trade goes back several thousand years.The time period you are referring to was before the ”world slave trade gearing up”. IMO.
You just lost your liberal card.Race is important, it just isn't the first thing I think of and post when I read an article that makes no mention of race.