This is a false statement: It is all about the Jimmys and Joes.
LSU won the game ultimately because Joe Brady was able to react correctly to what Venables designed to thwart the LSU offense. Brady made the correct adjustments, and Venables was not able to make comparable adjustments to reagin the upper hand.
On the other side of the ball, Dave Aranda had the perfect game plan to foul up Clemson's offensive rhythm. Once in-game tinkering got it just right, Clemson had nothing because Clemson made no adjustments that worked.
Venables got beat by the best OC in the college game. Elliott got beat by one of the 4 or 5 best DCs in the college game.
What Brady did against a DC as excellent as Venables is all the proof any CFB fan should need to conclude that Brady is the guy you want to get to your program as Oc/Associate HC/HC in waiting. Of course, that can work only if your HC is older and is a proven mentor. Mack Brown checks those boxes.
LSU won the game ultimately because Joe Brady was able to react correctly to what Venables designed to thwart the LSU offense. Brady made the correct adjustments, and Venables was not able to make comparable adjustments to reagin the upper hand.
On the other side of the ball, Dave Aranda had the perfect game plan to foul up Clemson's offensive rhythm. Once in-game tinkering got it just right, Clemson had nothing because Clemson made no adjustments that worked.
Venables got beat by the best OC in the college game. Elliott got beat by one of the 4 or 5 best DCs in the college game.
What Brady did against a DC as excellent as Venables is all the proof any CFB fan should need to conclude that Brady is the guy you want to get to your program as Oc/Associate HC/HC in waiting. Of course, that can work only if your HC is older and is a proven mentor. Mack Brown checks those boxes.