Back to topic, who agrees with me that we get Lauri ? No inside info, but my gut is screaming we get this kid. I would love to see us develope a little euro pipeline to counter the one & doners stateside that are looking elsewhere.
And ya know what, this kid could in the end be a bigger value guy than the likes of Ingram, Giles, dennis, or Bam. Reason being, those one & done fellas best game will NOT be in college, they will be gone after a single season. But if we get Lauri he will not just be with us a while (likely 3 and maybe 4) but he is a bit like Kaminsky was last season, gets better each season and all the sudden becomes a Wooden canidate. He and Bradley are rocks we can build off of that have HUGE upsides.
Dave, I agree that the Heels will get Lauri. I think he may be a more crucial recruit than Bradley. And if a Lauri signing leads to the start of a Euro pipeline that would be a brilliant coup by Roy. On the other hand, if Duke wins back-to-back titles with essentially the same strategy as last year the natives will get more and more restless. If K signs Giles, that gives him Giles, Tatum and Jackson for next year with the same strategy in 3 consecutive years. IMO, this is why the Heels need to win the NCAA title this year to even things out and change the "perception" that many have that you must have several one-in-dones to win titles. This year may be the Heels best chance in the next few years to win the NCAA title. They just need to get it done this season.
Last edited: