OK fess up, who else had to Google this?Originally posted by eec212020:
Complete BS. I guess you have never heard of takfirism.Originally posted by strummingram:
OK fess up, who else had to Google this?Originally posted by eec212020:
Complete BS. I guess you have never heard of takfirism.Originally posted by strummingram:
Is there anywhere else in the world that so many people are evil, as you put it? Why is it that so much murder takes place in this area of the world but not others? If it is not Islam, there must be another cause, right?Originally posted by tarheelbybirth:
Defend what? The murder of kids watching a soccer game? Of course not. But if the claim is it's the fault of Islam then what did those kids do? They were Muslims, too. If Islam is inherently evil and Muslims are fated to be killers then the folks in this thread should be celebrating a preemptive strike.
The point is that these assholes would use ANY excuse to kill...they're evil. They want power. Eliminate the Qu'ran and they would find another reason to massacre people. They could just as easily be Old Testament followers who are killing in the name of God - the verses are all there and there are certainly preachers out there who use the Bible to condone murder.
Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
You sure? Very long and extensive list I can put here for you if that's what you want. Now go to the New Testament and do the same.Originally posted by strummingram:
Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of theOriginally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death.
Such evil must be purged from Israel. Deuteronomy 17:12
Your turn
Not sure what version you use, maybe your own but here is the KJV version you just posted...................................
Deuteronomy 17:12
12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.
Does NOT say to kill anyone! It says "that man shall die" see the difference?
Completely wrong.Originally posted by strummingram:
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to
death. Exodus 21:15 NAB
All who curse their father or mother must be put
to death. They are guilty of a capital offense. Leviticus 20:9
If a man commits adultery with another man's wife,
both the man and the woman must be put to death. Leviticus 20:10
A priest's daughter who loses her honor by
committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to
death. Leviticus 21:9
Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your
God is giving you that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow
citizens astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove that
such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that town and
completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you
must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the
entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town
must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder
that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his
fierce anger and be merciful to you. He will have compassion on you and make
you a great nation, just as he solemnly promised your ancestors. "The LORD your
God will be merciful only if you obey him and keep all the commands I am giving
you today, doing what is pleasing to him." Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT
_________________________
It's all open to interpretation and to what extreme or level of fulfillment a person can justify killing in the name of God based on any modern-day action and equate it to ancient text. The only "difference" I see is to every individual's own mind and motivation. If your living conditions are basically primal, and survival is compromised, or at least challenged immensely, then you might be more inclined to adhere to the literal interpretations and carry them out. If you read the passages above, and focus on ONLY those kinds of passages in the Bible, then the Bible sounds like it encourages, condones, and promotes killing and death. And, the religions associated with it can get the same label.
If you're implying that Christians do not follow and renounce the OT, that's fine. I can't keep up with what all you religious club members follow or don't follow on whichever given day, or whatever the subject matter calls for in a given situation. I'm well aware that Jesus Christ was all about Peace. That doesn't stop alleged Christians from killing people. I'm simply showing that there are references, verses, referendums, commands, demands, admonitions, whatever, in the Bible... all of these can be construed as "God is telling me/us to kill people who don't believe as we do or don't follow the rules like we're supposed to." It's in Judeo-Christian Scripture, just like it's in all religious texts. I've read where Catholics burned Protestants alive. I've seen where Protestants hung Catholics and so on and so forth. But, MOST people in the modern world don't act on those literally. Most Muslims don't either. If you want to believe that they all do, or will, be my guest.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Still waiting on that New Testament quote.
Dodging the question. Why do you care that thirteen Muslims were slaughtered if they were evil?Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Those 13 still stood a good chance of being converted, maybe one of them was going to be the next Billy Graham.
Chicago?Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Is there anywhere else in the world that so many people are evil, as you put it? Why is it that so much murder takes place in this area of the world but not others? If it is not Islam, there must be another cause, right?Originally posted by tarheelbybirth:
Defend what? The murder of kids watching a soccer game? Of course not. But if the claim is it's the fault of Islam then what did those kids do? They were Muslims, too. If Islam is inherently evil and Muslims are fated to be killers then the folks in this thread should be celebrating a preemptive strike.
The point is that these assholes would use ANY excuse to kill...they're evil. They want power. Eliminate the Qu'ran and they would find another reason to massacre people. They could just as easily be Old Testament followers who are killing in the name of God - the verses are all there and there are certainly preachers out there who use the Bible to condone murder.
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.Originally posted by strummingram:
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to
death. Exodus 21:15 NAB
All who curse their father or mother must be put
to death. They are guilty of a capital offense. Leviticus 20:9
If a man commits adultery with another man's wife,
both the man and the woman must be put to death. Leviticus 20:10
A priest's daughter who loses her honor by
committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to
death. Leviticus 21:9
Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your
God is giving you that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow
citizens astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove that
such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that town and
completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you
must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the
entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town
must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder
that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his
fierce anger and be merciful to you. He will have compassion on you and make
you a great nation, just as he solemnly promised your ancestors. "The LORD your
God will be merciful only if you obey him and keep all the commands I am giving
you today, doing what is pleasing to him." Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT
_________________________
It's all open to interpretation and to what extreme or level of fulfillment a person can justify killing in the name of God based on any modern-day action and equate it to ancient text. The only "difference" I see is to every individual's own mind and motivation. If your living conditions are basically primal, and survival is compromised, or at least challenged immensely, then you might be more inclined to adhere to the literal interpretations and carry them out. If you read the passages above, and focus on ONLY those kinds of passages in the Bible, then the Bible sounds like it encourages, condones, and promotes killing and death. And, the religions associated with it can get the same label.
I've asked him to look up and comprehend abrogation multiple times. He puts his fingers in his ears and ignores it. He'dOriginally posted by eec212020:
Completely wrong.Originally posted by strummingram:
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to
death. Exodus 21:15 NAB
All who curse their father or mother must be put
to death. They are guilty of a capital offense. Leviticus 20:9
If a man commits adultery with another man's wife,
both the man and the woman must be put to death. Leviticus 20:10
A priest's daughter who loses her honor by
committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to
death. Leviticus 21:9
Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your
God is giving you that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow
citizens astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you
must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove that
such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that town and
completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you
must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the
entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town
must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder
that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his
fierce anger and be merciful to you. He will have compassion on you and make
you a great nation, just as he solemnly promised your ancestors. "The LORD your
God will be merciful only if you obey him and keep all the commands I am giving
you today, doing what is pleasing to him." Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT
_________________________
It's all open to interpretation and to what extreme or level of fulfillment a person can justify killing in the name of God based on any modern-day action and equate it to ancient text. The only "difference" I see is to every individual's own mind and motivation. If your living conditions are basically primal, and survival is compromised, or at least challenged immensely, then you might be more inclined to adhere to the literal interpretations and carry them out. If you read the passages above, and focus on ONLY those kinds of passages in the Bible, then the Bible sounds like it encourages, condones, and promotes killing and death. And, the religions associated with it can get the same label.
1)-Ever heard of the Islamic principle of Abrogation?
2)-Islam has the principle of Jihad. Do Christians?
That's exactly his point.Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.
The ones that wish to coexist with other religions are NOT following the Quran
OK, if they are NOT following the Quran how can they be Muslims? Why call themselves that if they don't belive in it?Originally posted by Raising Heel:
That's exactly his point.Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.
The ones that wish to coexist with other religions are NOT following the Quran
I guess for the same reason that Jews call themselves Jews even though they don't put Jewish women who commit adultery to death anymore. Just like Christians who fail to forgive those who wrong them in the worst way still call themselves Christians. It's one thing to believe in it, it's another thing entirely to act on it, especially in a literal sense. However, when your living conditions are worsened and your sensory systems are put to the worst test (you endure what these people have endured for generations now) then it's completely understandable how some of them will start to act on the verses in a literal sense. People always react that way when things become bad. I know of countless instances in history where, during adverse situations, the people felt they had angered God and needed to adhere to Scripture literally, so they go back to literal actions. We here in this country have had it pretty good for at least 60 or 70 years. They haven't. In the 1930's, during the Depression, there was a much stronger adherence to Scripture in our society due to the conditions become dire.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
OK, if they are NOT following the Quran how can they be Muslims? Why call themselves that if they don't belive in it?Originally posted by Raising Heel:
That's exactly his point.Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.
The ones that wish to coexist with other religions are NOT following the Quran
I do. I do it quite fervently. Thanks for noticing. It's a combination. If you think it's genetic or something, then your thinking is literally no different than Nazis believing all Jews were parasites at their core.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Ah yes! Blame it on their conditions and how they were raised!
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
It's a combination of ALL of it. You people seem intent on ONLY focusing on their religion. It's not only the way they were raised. Their living environment is something we can't even imagine. I believe their living conditions are much more of a culprit than how they were raised, even though those are also intertwined. And, we have to consider HOW their living conditions got to be so dire. What role did people representing "us" take in contributing to that. They take revenge personal and serious and they don't like foreigners interfering with how they live. I can empathize with that, but I don't understand the violent actions at all. I would hope that if we were subjected to their conditions, we wouldn't act-out as they do, but it wouldn't be a shock if some of us did. The way they interpret and act on their religious beliefs is kind of like gas on a burning fire, but I still do not believe that all Muslims the world over are predisposed to acting-out like these radicals. I believe that because most of them obviously don't. I also believe that were it not for the natural resource they live on, then most western nations would never have been interested in them or their barbaric ways. It's a fragile situation, but handling it by doing the same thing is only making it worse. But, if you insist that it's only their religion that MAKES them ALL a threat to civilized society, then you have a pretty big problem. I don't believe it at all.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Is that right Strum?
Not even close to being his point. He has said many times that the religion teaches peace and non-violence.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
That's exactly his point.Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.
The ones that wish to coexist with other religions are NOT following the Quran
Okay, but, to me, that's just different words for the same sentiment I proposed. That's why any of those people who act-out violently fail. They each choose to act as they do. Why they do it is a culmination of many, many things. But, to insist it's ONLY because of their religion, or religious beliefs, is naive and simplified. It's not as if they believe in a different God.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
I fail because I am a sinner by nature. I fail becuase of THE CHOICES I make. I fail because I don't put ALL my trust in God as I should. I don't fail becuase of how I was raised or where I grew up.
Well, then Jews who don't kill women who commit adultery are not adhering to the Torah, or Old testament. Christians who fail to forgive their enemies are not adhering to the Gospels. Religion and religious texts are open to interpretation to every person who reads them. I will agree, or admit, that in the present-day, there is an abundance of radicals of the religion of Islam that are going WAY overboard. That is a problem, no doubt. But, claiming that all Muslims are just a step away from being one of them is wrong. I've never met two people of the same religion (any religion) that had identical perceptions or interpretations of their religious texts. They are also individuals who have unique lives and circumstances that create unique outcomes and influences on others. I'm simply not going to buy-in to this fear of an entire Religion and all it's people. And, that goes for ANY religion!Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Not even close to being his point. He has said many times that the religion teaches peace and non-violence.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
That's exactly his point.Originally posted by DeanFor President:
Ok, now show me large groups of people going around doing this today. You can't.
The ones that wish to coexist with other religions are NOT following the Quran
There is ample proof that it does not. The muslims that are peace loving are NOT adhering to the Quran. Some of them are getting killed for it, like the 13 kids killed for watching soccer.
Couldn't they just carjack somebody or loot a convenience store or something? Boy, those zany muslims take up a notch, don't they?Originally posted by strummingram:
It's a combination of ALL of it. You people seem intent on ONLY focusing on their religion. It's not only the way they were raised. Their living environment is something we can't even imagine. I believe their living conditions are much more of a culprit than how they were raised, even though those are also intertwined.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Is that right Strum?
Well, those PARTICULAR zany Muslims do, yes. I don't understand the severity at all myself. It's clearly extreme and barbaric. In my opinion, they are not improving their situation or acceptance by the rest of the world when they do these things. I'm in complete agreement that those individuals are dangerous and powder kegs with a lit fuse. But, I also have my own set of priorities, as to what I have to be responsible for. In a previous thread, you laid-out your personal hierarchy of what concerns you most- family, friends, town, Virginia, and outward, in that order. I'm the same way. I would venture to guess that every single one of us on this board lives that way. So, while the actions and conditions of those places are horrible, there's very little we, as citizens in this country, can do to help them directly. And, once it goes beyond "directly" for me, I am just not very confident in the system. I am not someone who trusts people in government to do what the people want, so I don't trust them to act on our behalf. I truly hate it for all of those who suffer from it, but my prayer is that they find a way to remedy the situation. It would also be nice if most of us here don't react too irrationally and just wind up mimicking them in our reactions (as far as basic attitudes) to what they do! One way I can try and ste that is by encouraging people here to not judge all Muslims by the actions of those Muslims. I don't want people to judge all Baptists by the actions of the Westboro BAPTIST Church. I know a great many Baptists- many in my own family- and they are not like those Baptists!Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Couldn't they just carjack somebody or loot a convenience store or something? Boy, those zany muslims take up a notch, don't they?Originally posted by strummingram:
It's a combination of ALL of it. You people seem intent on ONLY focusing on their religion. It's not only the way they were raised. Their living environment is something we can't even imagine. I believe their living conditions are much more of a culprit than how they were raised, even though those are also intertwined.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Is that right Strum?
Who do you pray to?Originally posted by strummingram:
...but my prayer is that they find a way to remedy the situation.
First- no one is saying ALL mooslims are a threat. If someone is stating this, then I disagree with that person.Originally posted by strummingram:
It's a combination of ALL of it. You people seem intent on ONLY focusing on their religion. It's not only the way they were raised. Their living environment is something we can't even imagine. I believe their living conditions are much more of a culprit than how they were raised, even though those are also intertwined. And, we have to consider HOW their living conditions got to be so dire. What role did people representing "us" take in contributing to that. They take revenge personal and serious and they don't like foreigners interfering with how they live. I can empathize with that, but I don't understand the violent actions at all. I would hope that if we were subjected to their conditions, we wouldn't act-out as they do, but it wouldn't be a shock if some of us did. The way they interpret and act on their religious beliefs is kind of like gas on a burning fire, but I still do not believe that all Muslims the world over are predisposed to acting-out like these radicals. I believe that because most of them obviously don't. I also believe that were it not for the natural resource they live on, then most western nations would never have been interested in them or their barbaric ways. It's a fragile situation, but handling it by doing the same thing is only making it worse. But, if you insist that it's only their religion that MAKES them ALL a threat to civilized society, then you have a pretty big problem. I don't believe it at all.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Is that right Strum?
I fail A LOT, as the rest of my family does too. But we don't KILL PEOPLE over it!Originally posted by strummingram:
Okay, but, to me, that's just different words for the same sentiment I proposed. That's why any of those people who act-out violently fail. They each choose to act as they do. Why they do it is a culmination of many, many things. But, to insist it's ONLY because of their religion, or religious beliefs, is naive and simplified. It's not as if they believe in a different God.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
I fail because I am a sinner by nature. I fail becuase of THE CHOICES I make. I fail because I don't put ALL my trust in God as I should. I don't fail becuase of how I was raised or where I grew up.
I have no way of determining what percentage does what. Do you? Go live over there and see what factors make you feel or do things.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
First- no one is saying ALL mooslims are a threat. If someone is stating this, then I disagree with that person.Originally posted by strummingram:
It's a combination of ALL of it. You people seem intent on ONLY focusing on their religion. It's not only the way they were raised. Their living environment is something we can't even imagine. I believe their living conditions are much more of a culprit than how they were raised, even though those are also intertwined. And, we have to consider HOW their living conditions got to be so dire. What role did people representing "us" take in contributing to that. They take revenge personal and serious and they don't like foreigners interfering with how they live. I can empathize with that, but I don't understand the violent actions at all. I would hope that if we were subjected to their conditions, we wouldn't act-out as they do, but it wouldn't be a shock if some of us did. The way they interpret and act on their religious beliefs is kind of like gas on a burning fire, but I still do not believe that all Muslims the world over are predisposed to acting-out like these radicals. I believe that because most of them obviously don't. I also believe that were it not for the natural resource they live on, then most western nations would never have been interested in them or their barbaric ways. It's a fragile situation, but handling it by doing the same thing is only making it worse. But, if you insist that it's only their religion that MAKES them ALL a threat to civilized society, then you have a pretty big problem. I don't believe it at all.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
I believe Strum's point is that the Boko Haram, Hamas, Isis, etc would still be killing the same number of people even if Islam didn't exist. They do this because of the way they were raised.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Furthermore, I'd have to hear from the 350-400 murderers in Chicago that they carried out their act in the name of Jesus Christ before that comparison is the least bit relevant.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Not even close.
Chicago has approximately 350-400 killed per year.
Over the past 5 years Boko Haram is averaging about 1200-1500 per year in Nigeria in their drive to create a Caliphate. And I'm not even counting Hamas, Isis and Al Quida.
Is that right Strum?
Second- let's just deal with the radicals
Third- what % of their radical behavior do you attribute to their religion, and what percent is due to them being victims of their environment and foreign intervention?
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
That's good. Not all Muslims who fail kill people over their shortcomings either. Does Christ tell you to hold all Muslims as enemies and to believe they are all killers?Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
I fail A LOT, as the rest of my family does too. But we don't KILL PEOPLE over it!Originally posted by strummingram:
Okay, but, to me, that's just different words for the same sentiment I proposed. That's why any of those people who act-out violently fail. They each choose to act as they do. Why they do it is a culmination of many, many things. But, to insist it's ONLY because of their religion, or religious beliefs, is naive and simplified. It's not as if they believe in a different God.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
I fail because I am a sinner by nature. I fail becuase of THE CHOICES I make. I fail because I don't put ALL my trust in God as I should. I don't fail becuase of how I was raised or where I grew up.
It's not a "who." I don't humanize God. I don't refer to God as He or Him or anything that dictates a male. I don't believe God has a penis. It's just God. I try to draw understandings from all religions. I think they all work for the people who use them. I think they also divide people. So, it's not easy to understand.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
Who do you pray to?Originally posted by strummingram:
...but my prayer is that they find a way to remedy the situation.
What would then be their reasoning for killing? In the name of what?Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
If you watch the film, apparently some of them are getting paid to do this stuff. Money is a great motivator.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
What would then be their reasoning for killing? In the name of what?Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
You are the one claiming percentages- not me. Made me think you had a source or some further information to substantiate your opinion.Originally posted by strummingram:
I have no way of determining what percentage does what. Do you? Go live over there and see what factors make you feel or do things.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
First- no one is saying ALL mooslims are a threat. If someone is stating this, then I disagree with that person.
Second- let's just deal with the radicals
Third- what % of their radical behavior do you attribute to their religion, and what percent is due to them being victims of their environment and foreign intervention?
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
I don't know that the degree or level of radical acts would be the same. It might be more, it might be less. Islam does exist and that is the religion these people are claiming to follow. It's a bit of a Perfect Storm of circumstances. Dealing with it by sending troops over there and perpetuating more war and violence is a very bad idea... unless you want it to continue in the direction it's going.
That's what we are waiting on Strum to tell us.Originally posted by gunslingerdick:
What would then be their reasoning for killing? In the name of what?Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
I said those all factor into the outcome. If you want to insist it's only their religion, fine. Keep thinking that.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
You are the one claiming percentages- not me. Made me think you had a source or some further information to substantiate your opinion.Originally posted by strummingram:
I have no way of determining what percentage does what. Do you? Go live over there and see what factors make you feel or do things.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
First- no one is saying ALL mooslims are a threat. If someone is stating this, then I disagree with that person.
Second- let's just deal with the radicals
Third- what % of their radical behavior do you attribute to their religion, and what percent is due to them being victims of their environment and foreign intervention?
Am I correct in my understand of your position that even if Islam didn't exist and these radicals were Buddhists (or Atheists or agnostic), that they would still be killing children and suicide bombings and all that? Is that what you are trying to say here?
I don't know that the degree or level of radical acts would be the same. It might be more, it might be less. Islam does exist and that is the religion these people are claiming to follow. It's a bit of a Perfect Storm of circumstances. Dealing with it by sending troops over there and perpetuating more war and violence is a very bad idea... unless you want it to continue in the direction it's going.