In defense of the OP on this, I understand why it was started b/c of all the sudden talk about things on the TBS broadcast the day the post was created.
No, I'm talking about one of our own posters bringing this up NOW on our way to the FINAL 4. Wouldn't expect anything else from outsiders but our own should have plenty to talk about besides bringing this up. jmhho
It does exist, Emmert even issued a comment on it last week.
As Carolina fans we ought to give an assist to those that need clarification such as those that appear on fan sites with bad information or outright falsehoods.. As to the idiots out there "reporting" like Ms. O'Neil at dspn (couldn't even get her facts straight on Brice's foul and the entire nation saw it live on TV) they are simply amazing, they have ALL the facts and still screw it up.
That and it is filler reporting until Friday.
Exactly. I'd rather talk about it and talk about the actual facts. If we run and hide from it then we look like we're guilty. We know what the facts are and we should bring those to light.
I said this two days ago but some on here will not quit posting. Nobody is trying to hide from it! It's just the wrong time to talk about it! SMH!It's gonna be discussed here,just wish it would wait until after the tourney is over is all we're asking.
Question.
Easy classes...not a violation and obviously people in basketball pushing kids into classes that aren't real and just grades is.
I am interested in what can be different in classes. Obviously athletes don't have to be in every class as traveling gets in the way. Also they do get note takers and tutors. What about actual class requirements. I recently read they found classes where athletes didn't have to do as much work and projects as the non athletes. Is that in any way a violation? Perhaps somebody who was a college athlete can weigh in. I would assume that it likely would depend on how vast the difference. For example, if the class was like a lot of mine and 3 tests and 1 term paper, would it be a violation to keep that as the requirements for non athletes but let athletes just do the term paper?
Not that it will make people change their thoughts but Roy just said AGAIN on Mike n Mike that nothing is going to happen to men's basketball ..not that I think he would come out and say something if he did know men's Bball was going to get hit but he seems pretty damn hellbent that men's bball is OK
Clearly fans will run with what they want esp online. Mike seems to think I'm fishing...haha. I just honestly wonder. Assuming the burden of proof is on the NCAA, I assume that from what I have read its 1. Did people associated with basketball push kids into these classes. 2. Did they receive improper benefits while in these classes. The only improper benefit I can think of is, did they get a grade improved bc they are an athlete? or did they have to no do the work and still get the grade bc they are an athlete? Either can be proved or not which is why I asked about requirements bc that's the one thing I do know happened(tho not to what extent the different was)This is a great question, and one that I would like to know the answer to as well. Travel schedules ensure that athletes will miss a good portion of the classes. I assume that if one of the classes they miss is one of the big exams for the semester, that they need to make that up at some point - but I'm not certain of that.
We know that athletes get preferential treatment at every school with a major program in the country. How over the top is the preferential treatment is I guess what determines whether there's been a violation. I think we should allow the people who's job it is to investigate/determine that kind of thing do their jobs and let us know if there's been a violation (although if there has been, I would encourage them to take as long of a look at several other institutions and tell me something similar wasn't going on there). I realize the nature of fan bases is to see a headline and automatically assume guilt, and throw that guilt in the faces of other fans every chance they get - but it would be nice if people had even the slightest inkling about that which they talk. The clowns that keep saying "UNCheat!!!!11!1!111!" and things of that nature without even knowing the first thing about the situation, what a violation is, or any of the evidence in this particular case - are morons of the highest degree.
ClMike seems to think I'm fishing...haha.
Exactly. I'd rather talk about it and talk about the actual facts. If we run and hide from it then we look like we're guilty. We know what the facts are and we should bring those to light.
Question.
Easy classes...not a violation and obviously people in basketball pushing kids into classes that aren't real and just grades is.
I am interested in what can be different in classes. Obviously athletes don't have to be in every class as traveling gets in the way. Also they do get note takers and tutors. What about actual class requirements. I recently read they found classes where athletes didn't have to do as much work and projects as the non athletes. Is that in any way a violation? Perhaps somebody who was a college athlete can weigh in. I would assume that it likely would depend on how vast the difference. For example, if the class was like a lot of mine and 3 tests and 1 term paper, would it be a violation to keep that as the requirements for non athletes but let athletes just do the term paper?
Question.
Easy classes...not a violation and obviously people in basketball pushing kids into classes that aren't real and just grades is.
I am interested in what can be different in classes. Obviously athletes don't have to be in every class as traveling gets in the way. Also they do get note takers and tutors. What about actual class requirements. I recently read they found classes where athletes didn't have to do as much work and projects as the non athletes. Is that in any way a violation? Perhaps somebody who was a college athlete can weigh in. I would assume that it likely would depend on how vast the difference. For example, if the class was like a lot of mine and 3 tests and 1 term paper, would it be a violation to keep that as the requirements for non athletes but let athletes just do the term paper?
Ok thanks for that info. The study halls make sense and obviously as you said they can be done on the road.#1 to the post above...being that we're not actually playing in the game, I think we can focus on the game and this issue at the same time. I don't think Roy will mind.
#2 to the post right above it from the same guy...most people have not read the report. I find that most Tar Heel fans on this board have. So yes, we can shed light on the specifics of the report instead of just the horribly gross assumptions and exaggerations the national media provides. We know there is not much that the NCAA has against men's basketball. Most people don't know that due to said national media.
#3 College athlete here and have a few family members the same. Here's the deal. Any class you miss cuz you're on the road is excused. However, there are absolutely mandatory study halls that you have to attend to make up that work (or just attend even if the work is light early semester) Bottom line, you can't miss these. Countless times you're working on the plane, bus, etc. Tutors are absolutely available and 99.9999% of the time nothing shady at all goes on. They help, that's it. You can't skip tests, etc.
Now, what we're accused of is skirting that final part. Some people have claimed that some of these classes didn't even require attendance (before the online classes days) and athletes were not required to do all of the work. That is what the NCAA is investigating; plus if athletes were told to take these classes from either coaches or administrators for easy grades. From what I've gathered from the report, it seems like there isn't much proof of that happening with men's basketball.
#4 For those that don't want to talk about it this week even though all of America is, just ignore the thread. Plain and simple.
P.S. Let's kick some Cuse butt Saturday night.
As a former college athlete i can tell you about 80% of the regular college enrollment could not succeed with the schedule of a college player. I played baseball and on avg we played around 60 games in the spring semester. About half of those on the road riding on a damn bus. We had study halls and wven had to take test and write papers. We were all guided to easier classes during the season (ie library science,football physics etc) . Then when most students went home for the summer we had to bust our ass in summer school to make sure we stayed eligible and on track to graduate.
You see this is not only at unc (which i didnt attend) this is at every school that has a varsity sport. Not ONE college athletic dept has it any other way. It is the only way a college athlete can do it. Then throw in practice films meetings and everything else and you jackasses that sit online and criticize kids because they get prefarential treatment. Maybe you should try what we have done and then tell us how easy it is. I think you will have a diffrent view from other than your couch. Jmho
Question.
Easy classes...not a violation and obviously people in basketball pushing kids into classes that aren't real and just grades is.
I am interested in what can be different in classes. Obviously athletes don't have to be in every class as traveling gets in the way. Also they do get note takers and tutors. What about actual class requirements. I recently read they found classes where athletes didn't have to do as much work and projects as the non athletes. Is that in any way a violation? Perhaps somebody who was a college athlete can weigh in. I would assume that it likely would depend on how vast the difference. For example, if the class was like a lot of mine and 3 tests and 1 term paper, would it be a violation to keep that as the requirements for non athletes but let athletes just do the term paper?