ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Mostly because it can't live or breathe outside of its mother.

This also kinda vaguely resembles a baby... is this a baby too?

s-l500.jpg

So when a woman is pregnant doesn't have any complications, doesnt have an abortion what do you think will happen? She will give birth to a cabbage patch kid? Give birth to a maple tree?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I'm sorry to disappoint you but I don't have strong feelings about this, at least not strong enough to get into an argument over.
It doesn't surprise or even disappoint me that you wouldn't have "strong feelings about" any coverup of a D candidate/president so long as it ends with Trump not being in that office. Ends justify ANY means in your world.
But I will say I find it highly amusing that Trump's crotch remoras want to highlight Joe Biden's cognitive decline but are too far up Trump's ass to admit to all the things mentally wrong with him, from being a habitual liar to his self-serving corruption, from his sexual deviance to his pseudo religious sanctity. And not to mention possibly being more prone to gaffes than Biden ever was.
Glad you find such things amusing even if they are agenda driven narratives because you and yours won't advance policies or reasons for why his are so misplaced. More importantly in direct response to your comment, these claims are nothing new and he's the same guy now that he was decades ago - warts and all. This is far different from a lifelong politician who was always a moderate, campaigned as a moderate, and then went hyper speed to the left.
Besides, a clue to the much funnier joke can be found in the chyron on your screen shot, the one about Pam Bondi who should but doesn't have any idea of the definition of habeas corpus:

Perhaps slow down and fact check yourself. That's not Pam Bondi who is the Attorney General and responsible for all the legal actions and dealing with habeas corpus. Kristi Noem is Secretary of Homeland Security, never went to law school and never practiced law, nor would she have used an actual habeas corpus in any setting. Nevertheless, she didn't initially answer the question correctly. I'm sure she knows all about it now.

To dumb it down for you to know the distinctions between the two women, one is a blonde and one is a brunette. But yes, I understand your confusion as they both fall into the category where you'd never have a shot.
 
Yes, for the 1% of abortions that are the product of a rape or incest, they will have to drive out of certain states. But many of that 1% already live in states where abortions will remain legal and the rest probably live in states that will have rape or incest as an exception. So way to go standing up for the 6 people that do not fall into the mentioned exceptions.

And aren't most forms of contraception 90%-99% effective? If you want to be sexually active and not prepared to have a child, then use one. Use two. Hell, most of you people put on 3 masks.
You want more kids with spina bifida, down syndrome, etc forced into your state?

You want more poor fatherless babies in your state? Your solution to many things lately is "stable families", but the typical abortion patient is young, poor and single.

Those states are either going to have more poor, fatherless kids, or more medical emergencies due to coat-hangers plus a few more babies tossed into trashcans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Those supporting abortion are some quality folks.


" “You are damn right: It's about damn time we step into our power,” declared Henson. “It is about time we talk about the fact that guns have more rights than a woman. It's a sad day in America. … A weapon that can take lives has more power than a woman who can give life, if she chooses to.” "

here's some mindlessness for you. The special gift of life, an unborn baby, seems to be a precious little bundle of cells...when that suits the purpose. On some other day though, that annoying bundle of cells has got to go to the trash pile, like something you swept from under the sofa. Women are supposed to have that power, to decide just how worthwhile or worthless is the life growing inside them. It's these women that are worthless and they display the reason that the power to choose shouldn't rest solely with them.

But don't forget this part. Damn those life-taking guns that sometimes end life. What they demand is the right to end life themselves so they can be like the guns that they hate because...those guns take lives. The stupidity is incredible, and that's not hyperbole. It actually is incredible that people are that stupid, and that the stupidity garners a rousing round of applause from the equally mindless audience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Glad you find such things amusing even if they are agenda driven narratives because you and yours won't advance policies or reasons for why his are so misplaced.
Reasons misplaced? I guess that word choice works. For example, do you mean like the massive domestic policy package and multitrillion-dollar tax cut for the uber wealthy Trump has named the "big, beautiful bill"? The one that is projected to increase the national debt by $2.3 trillion? Talk about BIG GOVERNMENT and WASTEFUL SPENDING!

Meanwhile, as for the policies of the last administration that you are so cluelessly unaware of, how about:
- The American Rescue Plan Act (I realize you are still in denial that COVID-19 actually had an impact and took American lives, but you cannot deny that Trump 1.0 ran the American economy into the ground by ignoring the virus until it impregnated his fat ass.)
- The Respect for Marriage Act (I know, I know, you backwood, homophobic cousin-f*ckers believe all them lesbians and queers don't have the same rights as the rest of 'Merica.)
- The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (Yeah, yeah, you gun-loving Second Amendment redneck drunks think that ever damn pickup truck should be required to have a fully-stocked gun rack in the back winder.)
- The CHIPS and Science Act (I know, you're too stupid to even begin to understand any of that highfalutin, technological flimflam nonsense.)
- Honoring the PACT Act (That's right, but according to Donald Trump our veterans are losers and suckers, and if Trump says it's so, by God it's so.)
- The Juneteenth National Independence Day Act (Of course, you bigoted conservatives don't care nuttin' about them there colored folks, so let's send 'em back to Africa instead!)
- The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential-Transition Improvement Act (It's been blatantly obvious since 2020 that you sorry-ass sore losers don't give a damn about fair elections because it impedes your inclinations to cheat and you can always resort to claims of election impropriety anytime your candidate loses.)
- Extended the Affordable Care Act (If that n----- Obama created it, it must be DEI.)

AND . . .
- The economy added 16.6 million jobs, and Gross Domestic Product grew 12.6%. The Biden-Harris Administration is the only administration in history to have created jobs every single month.
- The Administration achieved the lowest average unemployment in 50 years—with record-low unemployment rates for Black Americans, Latino Americans, women, veterans, workers without a high school diploma, and workers with disabilities.
- The strong labor market led to better pay and working conditions. After-tax incomes increased by nearly $4,000, accounting for inflation, and real wages grew most quickly for low-wage workers. This is the strongest recovery for real wage growth in 50 years.

That's not Pam Bondi who is the Attorney General and responsible for all the legal actions and dealing with habeas corpus.
Yeah, my bad. I'll admit I sometimes get the names and faces of corrupt, unqualified-for-their-job sluts mixed up. Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem, Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi. Six of one, a half-dozen of the other. Same stupid shit in our government if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
Pam Bondi, spending government dollars all willy-nilly and MAGA thinks she is doing a fine job cutting costs. You cannot fix stupid.

 
You want more kids with spina bifida, down syndrome, etc forced into your state?

You want more poor fatherless babies in your state? Your solution to many things lately is "stable families", but the typical abortion patient is young, poor and single.

Those states are either going to have more poor, fatherless kids, or more medical emergencies due to coat-hangers plus a few more babies tossed into trashcans.

So you have just changed the discussion. The poast that I quoted was discussing the super rare instances of rape or when contraception failed. But you have moved the goal posts now. But I'm game.

Every community has NPOs that are designed to take care of the people in their community - WITHOUT USING TAX DOLLARS. Why don't we leverage that more? The Roe/Wade reversal is an opportunity for hundreds or even thousands of organization to take up the slack. And by allowing nonprofit organizations to do so, we will see very clearly what services are wanted and needed in each individual community. NPOs employ millions of Americans and the creation of more NPOs could potentially employ millions more. It's a win-win. But I get it...there's less virtue signaling in this option and more actual hands on work, which isn't a hallmark of those that are on that side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Pam Bondi, spending government dollars all willy-nilly and MAGA thinks she is doing a fine job cutting costs. You cannot fix stupid.

You're right about that. Once again, only s l o w e r . . . . . . . I'll repeat it just for you:

Pam Bondi is the BLONDE. The lady in your new video is a BRUNETTE who is named Kristi Noem. And that doesn't even begin to address the idiocy coming from Blumenthal.
 
" “You are damn right: It's about damn time we step into our power,” declared Henson. “It is about time we talk about the fact that guns have more rights than a woman. It's a sad day in America. … A weapon that can take lives has more power than a woman who can give life, if she chooses to.” "

here's some mindlessness for you. The special gift of life, an unborn baby, seems to be a precious little bundle of cells...when that suits the purpose. On some other day though, that annoying bundle of cells has got to go to the trash pile, like something you swept from under the sofa. Women are supposed to have that power, to decide just how worthwhile or worthless is the life growing inside them. It's these women that are worthless and they display the reason that the power to choose shouldn't rest solely with them.

But don't forget this part. Damn those life-taking guns that sometimes end life. What they demand is the right to end life themselves so they can be like the guns that they hate because...those guns take lives. The stupidity is incredible, and that's not hyperbole. It actually is incredible that people are that stupid, and that the stupidity garners a rousing round of applause from the equally mindless audience.

The part that blows my mind is the whole debate is over something that could be prevented with birth control in 99% of the cases. If you eliminate the 99% by getting the P.O.S's to take birth control then lets have a conversation on how to handle the 1%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
if it's a growing organism inside a woman's body, then yes.
Kinda like a tumor?
So when a woman is pregnant doesn't have any complications, doesnt have an abortion what do you think will happen? She will give birth to a cabbage patch kid? Give birth to a maple tree?
Once the fetus is around 39 weeks developed, it will be birthed and and will start living and breathing as a child. And if its mother wanted to abort it - odds are slim that it's going to be any productive member of society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You're right about that. Once again, only s l o w e r . . . . . . . I'll repeat it just for you:

Pam Bondi is the BLONDE. The lady in your new video is a BRUNETTE who is named Kristi Noem. And that doesn't even begin to address the idiocy coming from Blumenthal.
Idiocy? Speak for yourself, greenhorn.

Richard Blumenthal is currently serving his THIRD TERM in the United States Senate (since 2011). This is following one term in the House of Representatives. If you think this dumb brunette, Pam Bondi, knows more about budget and appropriation laws than this man, color me surprised!

NOT!!
 
The part that blows my mind is the whole debate is over something that could be prevented with birth control in 99% of the cases. If you eliminate the 99% by getting the P.O.S's to take birth control then lets have a conversation on how to handle the 1%.
I do agree that birth control should be used if someone is having sex and doesn't want a baby. I don't think anyone is arguing against that. I imagine the vast majority of the people wanting an abortion either had birth control fail, were raped, or found something that was either potentially damaging to the mother or producing an unviable fetus. While I agree that if anyone out there is saying "ahh fvck birth control, I'll just go get an abortion if I end up getting pregnant" is a moron, I don't think that's a very large portion of what's going on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So you have just changed the discussion. The poast that I quoted was discussing the super rare instances of rape or when contraception failed. But you have moved the goal posts now. But I'm game.

Every community has NPOs that are designed to take care of the people in their community - WITHOUT USING TAX DOLLARS. Why don't we leverage that more? The Roe/Wade reversal is an opportunity for hundreds or even thousands of organization to take up the slack. And by allowing nonprofit organizations to do so, we will see very clearly what services are wanted and needed in each individual community. NPOs employ millions of Americans and the creation of more NPOs could potentially employ millions more. It's a win-win. But I get it...there's less virtue signaling in this option and more actual hands on work, which isn't a hallmark of those that are on that side.
I have wanted to somehow make it possible to have affordable clinics available to poorer people by loosening the standards for care just a little. That's an outrageous suggestion to the lame of mind, who think poor people should have the same health care available to them that anyone else has. But that overtaxes the system and results in less quality health care for everyone.

Healthcare isn't some natural right to be supplied free to all, except in that no one can deny anyone access to whatever healthcare they can avail themselves of. It's a product or a commodity or a service. It is for sale. If one can understand that only the wealthier can afford to drive a 7 series BMW and that poor people have to settle for a beater Buick, it should also be understandable and acceptable for them to have possibly less quality healthcare but much more attainable healthcare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Hey, @pooponduke , I'm curious about your thoughts on the FOX News and MAGA cover-up of our demented president, and the current efforts to prop this moron up for the next four years or the end of the world, whichever comes first:

 
But that overtaxes the system and results in less quality health care for everyone.

That is who the left is. That is what they want. Equality to them means "shitty for everybody (except us, the ruling class, of course)". It's blatantly apparent in public education more so than anywhere else but for sure, they're doing the same thing to healthcare. That was BO's main objective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person


Apparently, a talent booker on Fox & Friends was looking for a guest to pay tribute to George Wendt. The actor, who played wiseass barfly Norm on Cheers, passed away earlier this week. Several of Wendt’s former castmates have been sharing their memories, so booking one of them on the show made sense — but who? Certainly not climate activist Ted Danson, who’d probably want to discuss nonsense like recycling or cleaning up the ocean. Libertarian Woody Harrelson is a noted wild card, and he might show up for a guest spot in a chemically altered state. Much better for a Fox & Friends audience would be Kirstie Alley, the Cheers star who publicly endorsed Donald Trump in 2016.

Fox & Friends wouldn't look so foolish had they just gone with Ted Danson.
🤣 🤣 🤣
 
I imagine the vast majority of the people wanting an abortion either had birth control fail, were raped, or found something that was either potentially damaging to the mother or producing an unviable fetus.

I do not believe that as you apparently do. In fact, I believe that makes up the great minority of abortion cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Hey, @pooponduke , I'm curious about your thoughts on the FOX News and MAGA cover-up of our demented president, and the current efforts to prop this moron up for the next four years or the end of the world, whichever comes first:


Hey, I thought you were going to answer my question. A liar, just like your wife when she says she loves you.
 
Kinda like a tumor?

Once the fetus is around 39 weeks developed, it will be birthed and and will start living and breathing as a child. And if its mother wanted to abort it - odds are slim that it's going to be any productive member of society.
in some ways like a tumor in that it grows inside the body, but it isn't a tumor. It's a human being. Are you really that desperate for some analogy that just doesn't exist? A baby is a baby. You can either treat it like an inconvenient annoyance or treat it with the same concern that any other human deserves.

The problem you describe is with the mother, not the child who can't yet defend itself. What we need to work on is rewarding responsible women who take birth control seriously and have more concern for human life. Rewarding women for being low-life and taking the easy way out isn't helping any. On the other hand, I would be all for sterilization. Tell me that wouldn't solve the problem and make me believe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I do agree that birth control should be used if someone is having sex and doesn't want a baby. I don't think anyone is arguing against that.
nobody is arguing against using birth control, but there are those who argue that abortion isn't really being used as retroactive birth control; and those people don't have a clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
That is who the left is. That is what they want. Equality to them means "shitty for everybody (except us, the ruling class, of course)". It's blatantly apparent in public education more so than anywhere else but for sure, they're doing the same thing to healthcare. That was BO's main objective.
Thank you. I almost added exactly the same thought to my post, but I was trying to keep it short.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Your fellow left wing scum just killed a Christian and Jew couple in DC...
So what? In case you haven't heard, we're now living in a lawless country with a 34-time CONVICTED FELON in the White House who is breaking laws and defying court orders on a weekly basis. Why should I care about two individuals I never met before getting gunned down in the streets of the nation's capital? Have at it, mister gunman. Shoot some more white folks.

You MAGA pussies scream at the top of your lungs about Venezuelan gangbangers and other "illegals" in this country who you broadly insist have committed rape, theft, and murder in our country. Yet your hero, the ORANGE FELON, has assaulted women his entire adult life, is currently robbing the country blind, and is in effect murdering starving children in Africa and around the world while over 60 tons of food intended for them rot in warehouses after he inexplicably and cruelly cancelled USAID. TRUMP IS A CHILD MURDERER.

And by the way, f*ck your Christian and Jew couple in DC.
 
I imagine the vast majority of the people wanting an abortion either had birth control fail, were raped, or found something that was either potentially damaging to the mother or producing an unviable fetus. While I agree that if anyone out there is saying "ahh fvck birth control, I'll just go get an abortion if I end up getting pregnant" is a moron, I don't think that's a very large portion of what's going on here.
https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-florida-2020/

That link shows Florida stats on reasons for abortion. 75% were elective, 25% were economic/social reasons, and only a tenth of a percent were reported as rape. I'm not sure that I agree entirely with your statement on reasons for abortions, but concede it would be a tough thing to prove or disprove, even if all states reported reasons. I believe a good amount of women aren't going to tell you why they are getting an abortion in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Speaking of dying from a gunshot wound, today the Trump Administration settled with Ashli Babbitt's family for $5 million of taxpayer money. A lot of people are pissed about this sham settlement, but as for me, I'm not too bothered by it. I don't know how the math will work out but I feel my share will be minimal and that's a small price to pay for all my enjoyment watching this dumb bitch getting blasted to Kingdom Come.

 
Speaking of videos from which I get a real hoot while watching, check out these dumb Trump voters now filled with regret. At least these people know when to scream "uncle." There are dumbasses on this message board who will argue 'til they're blue in the face that Trump is a genius and doing a bang-up job.

 
In follow-up to prior line of debate, the Court has come out with another one (note the CNN link so certain posters can/will read it, lol).

I am for the separation of church and state, especially in schools. I oppose anyone who thinks that the schools should be doing what the parents and churches should be doing. But as usual, that has been taken too far. The lefty wing article (CNN) says that the bar between church and state has been lowered; but that is a mischaracterization. The court simply ruled that in the context of praying after a football game, it was just ordinary free speech...and it was. No one was required to pray along with the others, and if a Muslim kid wanted to pray along, I'm sure he would have been welcome to.

If in a public school it was required to start the day with the Lord's Prayer, no dice on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
A baby is a baby.
Apparently it's not. Since some are calling a 10 week old fetus is a baby.

Rewarding women for being low-life and taking the easy way out isn't helping any. On the other hand, I would be all for sterilization. Tell me that wouldn't solve the problem and make me believe it.
I'm not sure how allowing women to pay for an expensive, painful procedure is really "rewarding" them, but ok. And it sure as hell is helping - it's helping the rest of society that doesn't have to then foot the bill for the baby.

But yes - I also would be completely on board for sterilization in certain circumstances. It's odd to me that you would be fine with deciding a person needs to be sterilized and shouldn't be allowed to bear children... but then force that same person to have a child if they were pregnant prior to sterilization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-florida-2020/

That link shows Florida stats on reasons for abortion. 75% were elective, 25% were economic/social reasons, and only a tenth of a percent were reported as rape. I'm not sure that I agree entirely with your statement on reasons for abortions, but concede it would be a tough thing to prove or disprove, even if all states reported reasons. I believe a good amount of women aren't going to tell you why they are getting an abortion in the first place.
Definitely tough/impossible to prove one way or the other. As seems to be indicated by the numbers, rape likely isn't a large portion. I assume health concerns to the mother/fetus are more frequent than rape, but still not that common. But what we don't know from those numbers is how many of the elective and economic abortions were from women who were taking birth control that failed, and how many of them were at least attempting to take birth control and fvcked it up by missing a few days of the pill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Definitely tough/impossible to prove one way or the other. As seems to be indicated by the numbers, rape likely isn't a large portion. I assume health concerns to the mother/fetus are more frequent than rape, but still not that common. But what we don't know from those numbers is how many of the elective and economic abortions were from women who were taking birth control that failed, and how many of them were at least attempting to take birth control and fvcked it up by missing a few days of the pill.
This group says that about 0.5% of abortions are due to rape. Of course, we know that must be false because that number is way too low, considering one white man rapes approximately 42.6 women in his life.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Definitely tough/impossible to prove one way or the other. As seems to be indicated by the numbers, rape likely isn't a large portion. I assume health concerns to the mother/fetus are more frequent than rape, but still not that common. But what we don't know from those numbers is how many of the elective and economic abortions were from women who were taking birth control that failed, and how many of them were at least attempting to take birth control and fvcked it up by missing a few days of the pill.
Oh I imagine failed contraception being the reason for getting pregnant is not completely insignificant. It doesn't affect how I view responsibility for the pregnancy. That said, I'm also not in the camp of zero elective abortion tolerance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I am for the separation of church and state, especially in schools. I oppose anyone who thinks that the schools should be doing what the parents and churches should be doing. But as usual, that has been taken too far. The lefty wing article (CNN) says that the bar between church and state has been lowered; but that is a mischaracterization. The court simply ruled that in the context of praying after a football game, it was just ordinary free speech...and it was. No one was required to pray along with the others, and if a Muslim kid wanted to pray along, I'm sure he would have been welcome to.

If in a public school it was required to start the day with the Lord's Prayer, no dice on that.

Completely agree.

The liberals are screaming that some of his football players feel "obligated or compelled" to stay in good graces with the coach. Well, that's a "them" problem. No one can control what other people think and feel. Furthermore, no one is expected to care what anyone else thinks and feels in that regard. If my kid was not a Christian and started to feel "obligated", I'd tell him to be comfortable in his own skin and do what he feels is right.

The vast majority of the team and the families of the kids on the team support the coach. This was another example of the left going to war over a handful of malcontent kids and their families most likely because they suck at football and weren't getting the playing time that the parents thought their kid deserved. And instead of telling their kid "get better", they went with the lazy way and cried foul on the praying and said their kid doesn't take part in that and that's why they're not playing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You want more kids with spina bifida, down syndrome, etc forced into your state?

You want more poor fatherless babies in your state? Your solution to many things lately is "stable families", but the typical abortion patient is young, poor and single.

Those states are either going to have more poor, fatherless kids, or more medical emergencies due to coat-hangers plus a few more babies tossed into trashcans.

You forgot about gingers. Birthing people should be forced to abort gingers, along with these fetuses that have obvious defects that you mentioned.

Abortions should be mandatory in some cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Apparently it's not. Since some are calling a 10 week old fetus is a baby.


I'm not sure how allowing women to pay for an expensive, painful procedure is really "rewarding" them, but ok. And it sure as hell is helping - it's helping the rest of society that doesn't have to then foot the bill for the baby.

But yes - I also would be completely on board for sterilization in certain circumstances. It's odd to me that you would be fine with deciding a person needs to be sterilized and shouldn't be allowed to bear children... but then force that same person to have a child if they were pregnant prior to sterilization.
you don't understand prevention of pregnancy as compared to annihilation of a pregnancy? The destruction of a living being compared to never having to answer that question again? Not sure I know how to penetrate that level of density, no offense intended.

The woman is obviously rewarded by giving her an out to her pregnancy. She is rewarded for her casual and probably reckless behavior that caused the pregnancy to happen. The burden of having the kid and then raising it ioverwhelms the trouble of having an abortion. These things seem so obvious to me that I can't help but think you are reaching pretty far for an answer. Good luck.

And we are probably on the hook for that abortion, BTW and FWIW.

The arrogance of presuming a regretable outcome for a child as reason to terminate that child is part of a dystopian nightmare that I want no part of, if I can somehow avoid it. I know it's coming but hopefully I'll be on a utopian cloud by then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Of course, we know that must be false because that number is way too low, considering one white man rapes approximately 42.6 women in his life......
.....and drinks the equivalent of 3800 cases of beer. As we used to say when I was in the Army, someone must be raping my share of women but I'm drinking his share of beer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
https://lozierinstitute.org/abortion-reporting-florida-2020/

That link shows Florida stats on reasons for abortion. 75% were elective, 25% were economic/social reasons, and only a tenth of a percent were reported as rape. I'm not sure that I agree entirely with your statement on reasons for abortions, but concede it would be a tough thing to prove or disprove, even if all states reported reasons. I believe a good amount of women aren't going to tell you why they are getting an abortion in the first place.
Some interesting stuff in there. Of course florida people be cra-cra, but still.
  • "Thirteen percent of the abortions were on married women" - yikes

  • "a quarter reported one prior abortion and 19 percent had undergone more than one previous abortion" - holy shit 19% were going for their third?

  • "A quarter were on women with one live birth, and another 37 percent were obtained by women with two or more live births." Over half already had a kid and didn't want another.

  • "56 percent were chemical" (abortion pill, basically forcing a miscarriage via hormonal changes in mom)

  • 75% in first 6 weeks, 92% before week 10
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
@Hark_The_Sound_2010 doing so much winning right now.

It's funny that most far right people on here think it has to be black and white. So simple minded.

How about this? Health concerns to mom and/or fetus you can have an abortion. Rape pregnancy, as rare as the numbers above have shown it to be, you can have an abortion. Make birth control free (it basically is already) and if you're prescribed on the pill and you somehow get pregnant, you can have an abortion.

If you're using abortion as a birth control method, then you're screwed and no abortion.

Does this make too much sense?

and @bluetoe 's retarded statement about an abortion being a gift to women is one of the funniest things I've heard on here in a while. I appreciate that you're ignorant enough to laugh at, thanks man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
@Hark_The_Sound_2010 doing so much winning right now.

It's funny that most far right people on here think it has to be black and white. So simple minded.

How about this? Health concerns to mom and/or fetus you can have an abortion. Rape pregnancy, as rare as the numbers above have shown it to be, you can have an abortion. Make birth control free (it basically is already) and if you're prescribed on the pill and you somehow get pregnant, you can have an abortion.

If you're using abortion as a birth control method, then you're screwed and no abortion.

Does this make too much sense?

and @bluetoe 's retarded statement about an abortion being a gift to women is one of the funniest things I've heard on here in a while. I appreciate that you're ignorant enough to laugh at, thanks man.
Abortion is not being used as a form of birth control. You need to read up on how an abortion is performed. No person in their right mind would go through that rather than take a free pill each day. Use some common sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
@Hark_The_Sound_2010 doing so much winning right now.

It's funny that most far right people on here think it has to be black and white. So simple minded.

How about this? Health concerns to mom and/or fetus you can have an abortion.
Technically being born to a single, poor, young mom in many parts of the US is a health concern, sometimes for the fetus (malnutrition) but more often for the baby for the rest of it's life. And how bout health concerns to the people in the community having to deal with the added burdens of poverty?

The abortion pill can be used up to 10 weeks, it is basically a hormonal change in the mom that forces a miscarriage. Plenty of women naturally miscarriage due to hormonal issues not from ru-486... there isn't a ton of difference.

Is it sin now to not force every woman over 15 to visit a fertility clinic to make sure her hormones are primed for a healthy womb, thus thwarting natural miscarriages?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Abortion is not being used as a form of birth control. You need to read up on how an abortion is performed. No person in their right mind would go through that rather than take a free pill each day. Use some common sense.
Jesus. And you make it freaking impossible to even remotely feel ok about siding with the left on something. I hope you break your hip on your way down your soapbox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Technically being born to a single, poor, young mom in many parts of the US is a health concern, sometimes for the fetus (malnutrition) but more often for the baby for the rest of it's life. And how bout health concerns to the people in the community having to deal with the added burdens of poverty?

The abortion pill can be used up to 10 weeks, it is basically a hormonal change in the mom that forces a miscarriage. Plenty of women naturally miscarriage due to hormonal issues not from ru-486... there isn't a ton of difference.
See above.

God I hate the left.
 
Jesus. And you make it freaking impossible to even remotely feel ok about siding with the left on something. I hope you break your hip on your way down your soapbox.
I don’t understand your response. Do you really think women are using abortion as a form of birth control? That just makes no sense at all. Think about it, or talk to a woman who has had one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
you don't understand prevention of pregnancy as compared to annihilation of a pregnancy?
They both result in the same thing: no unwanted children running around. If preventing unwanted pregnancy is the goal - it shouldn't matter whether your seed was chemically blocked from fertilizing an egg, chemically destroyed after fertilizing an egg, or ended up deposited in that crusty tube sock tucked under your mattress to begin with.
The woman is obviously rewarded by giving her an out to her pregnancy. She is rewarded for her casual and probably reckless behavior that caused the pregnancy to happen. The burden of having the kid and then raising it ioverwhelms the trouble of having an abortion.
So this seems to be the crux of the issue here. You want to punish people for "casual and probably reckless behavior". Burden them with the task of raising an unwanted child, as penance for not being careful (or lucky) enough to avoid the pregnancy in the first place.

At least just say that you're looking to legislate morality, and we can drop the whole charade around caring about all of these fetuses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT