OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Hope so. Fingers-crossed for lake/trump 2024.
all these thots at the “patriot awards” are going to be wishing for an opportunity to make a decision about choice in a few weeks.
i would say back to football, but i’ve got to exit out of one app to the other…c’mon, prime, figure this out.
i would say back to football, but i’ve got to exit out of one app to the other…c’mon, prime, figure this out.
Don't fear Moochelle Obama will be on the Democratic ticket in '24. Obama/Winfrey '24
This is spot on. Trump needs to understand that the vast ground swell of appeal he enjoyed to upset the world's smartest woman has been eroded. His core will stay with him just like those posters on here that will vote against him even if the other choice was an undiagnosed dementia patient, but I personally don't feel that he is electable in a general election due to those middle, swing voters. He can win the R nomination, but he'll lose again in the general. I just wish his internal numbers team would tell him this.
ROFL. Talk about your all time poorly sourced comment. Matthew Gertz: went to Columbia U, managed Diane Farrell's Dem Congressional Campaign in Conn.; was an intern for Chuckie S.; and is a Senior Fellow for Media Matters where he focuses on the relationship between Fox News and the Trump administration (people actually get paid for that?!?!). No wonder you follow him.
Of course, his tweet is idiocy. It's been just over a week. Hell, we don't even have all the results yet. There are plenty of crime stories out there locally (sadly) and the nationals have had other important stuff to discuss (how about your climate conference for instance?). Along these lines and the logic of Gertz, one could conclude that the world supply shortage has caused us to completely run out of ice cream because CNN and MSNBC haven't run a single story of Joe sampling some on any of his recent ventures out of the WH or Delaware basements. And before you tell me it was a joke or pointing out the Fox partisanship, there is nothing in the tweet to indicate it is anything but factual. That's the problem for the young and other idiots out there who actually think they are getting news off of twitter, fakebook, and tictac (it's also why heads have exploded over musk reforming it).
Imagine being mad at a news station for talking about the increase in crime rather than being mad at the politicians whose policies are causing an increase in crime.
Dumb libs gonna lib.
Dumb libs gonna lib.
Imagine being mad at a news station for not talking about a significant election issue after an election rather than the results of said election and more immediate world events thereafter. Sadly, after the dust settles, the crime wave created by the events and policies of the last couple years will still be here to talk about.
Two months of data. Was there a two month trend on ice cream? Nope. The fact is that the House under GOP leadership has squashed crime overnight.
So there was nothing else to talk about in Sept & Oct than crime?
if some country actually invaded, they wouldn't be able to place anything approaching 5 million people inside our borders. We ARE being invaded, by several countries, and Biden and Harris are aiding and abetting that invasion in full violation of existing laws. But let's just put that aside because I keep harping on it. Gotcha.
And there you go doing the liblogic tango, as expected. I pointed out valid reasons for getting Biden the hell out of office, and then, in answer to your suggestion that you wouldn't have grounds for impeachment, I supplied the indication that an impeachment could happen even for political reasons as well as for grounds that aren't so clearly stated in the C.
So you go and twist that into impeaching Biden would be purely political. How very libtardish of you.
There probably was, but the week after the election seems like an obvious time for it to go down, because people were talking about a historic election. That was a much more important topic at the time. My guess is pretty much every topic went down the week after the election.
nobody said I didn't care in any general sense. I said I don't care about who marries who, and I don't. But of course you can't flap your gums against that so you, in your normal fvckwad manner, create a strawman about my 'caring'. How original. Dirtbags like you who just like to spew nonsense, have been doing that from time immemorial.
You're a one-trick pony.
Historic? Oh, you talking about the tranny being elected in Minnesota?
Historic might have been too strong of a word. I guess unusual would have been better. Republicans performed below the historical average in this election.
I wouldn't want such a derailment electorally, but they would make one hell of a Presidency. I wish.
Historical averages are thrown out the window now. Current political division makes past trends obsolete. Oh, and there's the rampant fraud you have to factor in.
Right. They'd be great for Americans but not for the establishment. Even the GOP wouldn't allow that ticket to win.
It is purely political. That much is clear. Especially with you.
You have good thoughts and analysis on many topics. This is not one of them.
Correction they'd be good for you and the minority of people that feel as spiteful, conformist, and bigoted as your ilk.
Political? Is that the reason Liberal mayors are raising hell when Abbott and DeSantis share the wealth with them?
Calm down...
There's no strawman. You claim to not care and then go on and on showing you do care based on your prejudices, as always.
Ah, yes sending hundreds of vulnerable people without telling them where they are going, tricking them, and doing so for as a political stunt to appease their base.
Yeah, why would anyone have a problem with that?
You might have to set aside your delicate sensibilities for the financial benefit of you and the rest of us.
I think this is right on. I seriously am not sure about the R nomination. What just happened in FL - a true deep dark red tsunami in 99% of counties and cities, unlike any blowout in what once was a blue / purple state - the significance can't be overstated. People just want to win, love a winner, and so many on the right and in the middle just want:
1) a return to some sanity and competent leadership (opposite of Dementia Joe, the Hoe, and the Ds)
2)....without all the baggage, personal vendettas, low-IQ, low character, mean pettiness of DJT
I think as time goes on...if DeSantis (44) runs against DJT (78) - DeSantis will win. He a multiple times better leader, family man, intelligent man, communicator, more likeable - including across key woman / Latino / Black / young people demo than DJT.
If it comes to this - crazy as it may sound with how bad the Ds heads are permanently infected with TDS....I'd guess they will push / vote for DJT to win the R primary. DJT they hate. DeSantis they are afraid of. He would obliterate Biden or Harris or Hillary or whoever they put up in 2024.
But you still have a key problem even if DeSantis does win the nomination. Trump wouldn't go quietly in the night. He willingly concedes or backs down from no one.
The chances of him running as an independent are high if that happens.
Unless Trump runs as a third party candidate after he loses the nomination, and claims fraud for that, too. He won't accept a loss and back the candidate that beat him. If he runs as a third party candidate, the Rs lose again. Republicans can only hope for an indictment or a death.
Why should just the southern states have to deal with the BS? Most liberal cities are sanctuary cities. Let the prove it. Have you even looked at the numbers illegally crossing the border since Biden took office? It's not a coincidence the number has skyrocketed.
Yeah, I'd much rather he die. An indictment would give the liberal pearl-clutchers too much ammunition against MAGA. So I'd rather a heart attack take Trump out. His legacy would be strengthened by something like that and the MAGA movement would strengthen also. That's good for most of America.
They're criminals. Why the f*ck would or should anyone give a shit if they are tricked (which they weren't) or manipulated? Again, they're here illegally. They have no rights at all here. You want rights, find a different country to sneak into.
Yeah - you got us. I mean - look at (the absolute clusterf dumpster fire) AZ election. Find the most backward shthole 3rd world uncivilized country on the planet, and they are likely laughing their asses off at what a moronic incompetent election just occurred there....all facilitated, overseen - by one of the candidates! It'd be like The Rat himself being coach, scorekeeper, and referee in a Heels / Dook game.
So legit and ethical. What could possibly go wrong?
Half the machines in largest county go down early on election day. Or run out of ink (how could they have foreseen that?) All working fine the day before. 10s of thousands of ED voters turned away, ballots don't scan, or go home due to wating in line for hours.
Again - perfectly normal, legit, accurate. "Counting", curing, finding votes a week+ after the election. It truly is a standard for future states to emulate (like FL which is 5-8X the population of AZ and were done counting about 2 hours after polls closed).
One way or another, the whole AZ election apparatus powers need to be fired and / or put in jail
yeah, I'm going to take your opinion on that into consideration and process it with the depth of evaluation that it warrants. OK I'm done.
ETA...I should ask though, does it ever occur to you to actually explain what you claim? I am interested in why you think my 'analysis' here is faulty or somehow lacking.
I'm not sure he would run as an independent, because I don't think his ego would allow him to lose for the third time.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Mack Fired/Belichick Hired (Update 1-23: Lombardi on McAfee today)- Latest: ticket2ride04
