yeah, so? What does that have to do with you? You can be trans without promoting it, as we have discussed. And I don't think it should be promoted, as I have made well known.
even more lost than usual?
lol, and dimwits with nothing to lose think that if it's change, it must be cool. Sound about right?
It's not a matter of "cool" or "uncool"... it's just fun watching old guys shake with fear when it inevitably comes.
that's such self-absorbed bullshit on your part. I have gone out of my way to let you know that I consider your existence AS YOU ARE completely acceptable (as have others), and you still insist on holding your little pity party.
you didn't exactly condemn that situation either specifically or in general, you just seemed to treat it as a wrong but not entirely unacceptable situation. Just like the above...you are saying that if someone is using trans as an excuse to check out the women's area it isn't OK, but if they are simply exercising their right to use any locker room they want to, then no problem. What is decent and right is to say no dicks, no way, in the women's locker room.
don't mistake fear for disgust, nimrod. Disgust is what you and your mindless ilk provoke in me, You support any abject stupidity that comes along.
Stop being such a creepy old man, blue. Can't you create more age-appropriate discussions with your fellow old white men here, like AARP membership and ways to add more fiber to your diet?
why are you butting in? Oh that's right, dicks in a locker room is being discussed. Should have known you'd show up to voice your approval.
more self-absorbed bullshit. Paragraph after paragraph about how it isn't about you, lol.
Really? I'm still waiting for you to say exposed dicks or a dick-bearing human being in a women's locker room is never appropriate.
really? Of what? Of your need for recognition? Your desire to make us all aware of your 'struggle'? Na, that's more than apparent.
well, you would be speaking 'broadly', har har.
" there is great fear and misunderstanding, sometimes bordering on violent hatred when it comes to trans people."
in opposing me, YOU said nothing about the core situation was acceptable...yet there wasn't any nuance to suggest that your 'acceptable' above conditions might have existed. That's why I challenged you. THAT is what I was trying to establish, your bullshit and your hypocrisy, not any introduced 'nuance'.
yeah, I do miss those discussions about you hanging around the men's locker room in high school and occasionally getting stuffed into a locker; and then trying to portray yourself to us as an athlete. Lots of laughs back then.
Relax dude. I was making a joke about you posting a Heels basketball comment on the pol thread. No big deal. But it seems you are the confused one here.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
www.thegatewaypundit.com
you don't 'have to' use ANY room. You can either choose the appropriate one according to the presence of male gonads or not use one at all. Not using one at all is not the hardship you want to make it out to be. It's simply a minor limitation of your condition. Stop trying to impose it on the rest of us. You are different. Accordingly, aspects of your life will be different. Deal with it.
you don't get to say when or how much I employ empathy. That's the issue here. You somehow believe that you are entitled to it. You aren't, and neither am I. Oh wait, that's right, you have decided that I'm an older white male so I don't need any recognition or empathy or consideration. You have no clue as to what my life is and has been like, but you can pigeonhole me as not deserving considerations while you demand not only considerations but accommodation as well. If there's an argument here (now that you've come clean, [so to speak]), it's that you think your condition entitles you to special consideration, and I say bullshit to that. You aren't physically handicapped.
I mean yeah, if I'm at a gym, I have to go somewhere. I'm not going to use the damn men's room when I do not look, sound, or act like a man. It's really not that big of a deal that I use the women's bathroom. I impose nothing. You're the one imposing your prejudice and ignorance on me because I'm different.
yes I did what? You need better reading comprehension. It is clearly mentioned that the naked guy was supposedly transgender....and it has to be assumed that the Y's policy of allowing naked men to use the women's locker room is based on said male being what amounts to a woman. C'mon man. This is a transgender issue, and I'm not the one who made it one. I'm giving you here the FIRST PARAGRAPH of the text...
tell me this...who said you were abnormal? That's right I did, and you are. That's a fact. Who said I said you were TOO abnormal. That's right, not me. YOU said it in attempting to distort my POV for your own purposes, which of course is making this all about you and your condition. And like it or not, it doesn't matter what I call it, it is an 'it', a condition. A rose by any other name smells just as sweet.
I hope you don't have to watch it alone. Just let your dick hang out and @Heels Noir will be right over.
This is what it’s like talking to you sometimes. Alas, this is getting pointless.
I’m going to watch football and have a beer.
lol yes, it must be like talking to the 'brick wall of truth'. I can't say you've done much to bring it down or get around it, so it is pretty much pointless for you to keep trying to defeat it. It's been fun watching you try.
This is what it’s like talking to you sometimes. Alas, this is getting pointless.
I’m going to watch football and have a beer.
🤣More to come.
Justice Department sees first acquittal of Jan. 6 rioter found not guilty on obstruction charge
A Jan. 6 rioter shot in the face by a police projectile at the Capitol who said his goal was to praise "the name of Jesus on the Senate floor" was acquitted of obstruction of justice.www.foxnews.com
DC judges and juries are not real law anymore. They are merely operating and engaged in crimes under color of law.
