ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Just know that every time I see your posts, this is what I think of:

Screen-Shot-2018-07-17-at-10.42.48-PM-628x420.png
LMAO. I looked for a good pic or gif or something to tell you what I think of when seeing your posts, but I couldn't find anything not too innappropriate. And then the perfect item was dropped in my lap from the most unexpected of sources. The irony is too rich sometimes....

 
  • Haha
Reactions: dadika13
LMAO. I looked for a good pic or gif or something to tell you what I think of when seeing your posts, but I couldn't find anything not too innappropriate. And then the perfect item was dropped in my lap from the most unexpected of sources. The irony is too rich sometimes....

I laughed. This is a great comeback, you win this one.
 
There isn't one single claim I have made you can factually refute. Not one.
All you can do is mock as if you know something when in reality, you do not because you cannot answer factually to a single claim I have made, can you?
So the democrats are hacking people’s thermostats against their will? You point blank claimed so. Then I proved that it was a voluntary program they signed up for with the power company and you stfu.

Strike one.

Want more? Shall we talk about what you claimed about Paul pelosi?
 
Last edited:
there's a lot of that here. Empty snark and mockery based on nothing substantial and factual, just spitball-throwing from the position opposite yours. Chimps throwing poop.

Just wait, one of them will pipe up and say sarcastically 'well what about you?'.
He’s what’s wrong with the political climate today. And I think you know that. Outrageous lies designed to do nothing more than incite division at best. And I’m “throwing poop” for pushing back? Come on man. Maybe you’re saying that about the board in general and that’s fair. But Do you think it’s wise to claim the vaxx is killing millions of people? Is it appropriate to claim hospitals are intentionally murdering Covid patients? It’s tempting to think it’s harmless idiocy and maybe it is. But it’s not fair to claim I’m taking issue based on nothing substantial. I’ve challenged him with facts numerous times.
 
Last edited:
please let this happen! It would be something right out of a Peachtree dish!

2/3 of the evil trinity of the apocalypse! All we need now is for the pope to get on board then you better be digging a survival cave.
 
So the democrats are hacking people’s thermostats against their will? You point blank claimed so. Then I proved that it was a voluntary program they signed up for with the power company and you stfu.

Strike one.

Want more? Shall we talk about what you claimed about Paul pelosi?
You proved nothing actually. You just claimed you did.
 
He’s what’s wrong with the political climate today. And I think you know that. Outrageous lies designed to do nothing more than incite division at best. And I’m “throwing poop” for pushing back? Come on man. Maybe you’re saying that about the board in general and that’s fair. But Do you think it’s wise to claim the vaxx is killing millions of people? Is it appropriate to claim hospitals are intentionally murdering Covid patients? It’s tempting to think it’s harmless idiocy and maybe it is. But it’s not fair to claim I’m taking issue based on nothing substantial. I’ve challenged him with facts numerous times.
It is appropriate because it's absolutely true. You'd have to have your head stuck in the sand not know it.
 
If you vote democrat, you are voting to sexually groom young children. The usual suspects can rage and act like such things are not true but the facts speak for themselves.

" Students from kindergarten through the third grade will learn about sexual orientation based on "who they love," emphasizing that "anyone can love anyone," while grades four and five will learn the definitions of gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual and asexual, the video explains."

"Love anyone," eh? Like a teacher or adult?

 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe
What does Queer Theory have to do with Black History?

"
“I figured, ‘Yeah, they may be doing CRT (critical race theory),’’’ DeSantis said at a recent event in Jacksonville. “It’s way more than that. This course on Black history, what [is] one of the lessons about? Queer Theory … That is somebody pushing an agenda on our kids … advocating things like abolishing prisons. Now that’s a radical political position. You’re free to take that in your own life … But how is that being taught as fact?”

One could hardly quarrel with anything in that diatribe. As usual, DeSantis has picked a plum issue to identify, isolate, and shame those who would poison the minds of rising generations with Marxist agitprop – after first encouraging them to reject immutable gender identity embraced by civilization and science for millennia. Perhaps DeSantis will next ridicule the assertion – said with a straight face in progressive circles – that a man can have a baby."

 
I love them for how foolish it makes his type look. And I don’t lump you in with him fwiw. I do know you’re smarter than that.
The funny thing is you guys think most people agree with you when in reality, you are in the minority, and most actually tend to agree with me especially over time. Some may be hesitant to accept some basic facts but they tend to come out.

33% of democrats, for example, say they know someone personally whom they believe died from the vaccines.

That's not just those who no longer accept that they are safe and effective and believe they are dangerous. I am sure that number is far higher but that's 33% saying they know someone killed by the jab.

Yet you guys act like that's crazy talk.
 
This is why we cannot trust "the science."

"
When scientific inquiry exposes corporate malfeasance and misinformation, universities often seek to shut it down.

In fact, William Parker joins a growing number of cutting-edge academic researchers and editors."

 
He’s what’s wrong with the political climate today. And I think you know that. Outrageous lies designed to do nothing more than incite division at best. And I’m “throwing poop” for pushing back? Come on man. Maybe you’re saying that about the board in general and that’s fair. But Do you think it’s wise to claim the vaxx is killing millions of people? Is it appropriate to claim hospitals are intentionally murdering Covid patients? It’s tempting to think it’s harmless idiocy and maybe it is. But it’s not fair to claim I’m taking issue based on nothing substantial. I’ve challenged him with facts numerous times.
calm down a little. I wasn't referring to you specifically. That's why I said 'there's a lot of that going on here' instead of 'he does that a lot'. That being said, I do not at all respect those who never offer any actual rebuttal, but rather respond with unfounded buffoonery. It was a generality.

So far as what @randman1 posits, I take it for what it's worth. Sometimes that's worth noting, other times maybe not so much...but either way I don't shit my pants over anything anyone posts here, and I don't understand why others are so bothered by what they contend is lunacy. Like @gunslingerdick says, it's entertaining to see the panties getting all wadded up over what they contend isn't worth getting their panties in a wad over.

Regarding what you question as being wise....if it's that outrageous, is it wise to lend it credence by asking if it's wise to post it?
 
respond with unfounded buffoonery.
I miss those days on OOTB. Where every response and every thread was nothing but that. That's when it was at it's peak. It's so bad now that people don't even have debates about post vs poast or damnit vs dammit. Hell, I can't even remember the last time we had a rank'em thread or tried to figure out the M1 vs M2 method (which I still don't completely understand) when ranking women.
 
I miss those days on OOTB. Where every response and every thread was nothing but that. That's when it was at it's peak. It's so bad now that people don't even have debates about post vs poast or damnit vs dammit. Hell, I can't even remember the last time we had a rank'em thread or tried to figure out the M1 vs M2 method (which I still don't completely understand) when ranking women.
I might be misreading but I'm not sure what you are saying you miss.....is it unfounded buffoonery you miss, or the opposite?

And the M1 vs. M2 thing intrigues. Can you expound on that a little. I'm always up for ranking women, so to speak.
 
I might be misreading but I'm not sure what you are saying you miss.....is it unfounded buffoonery you miss, or the opposite?

And the M1 vs. M2 thing intrigues. Can you expound on that a little. I'm always up for ranking women, so to speak.

We didn't take ourselves (or politics) as seriously. There were more jokes, less of the 'chimps throwing poop'.

This is not to reopen an old wound or assign blame, but I think it got worse from 2017 onward. Not to mention the incident with Billy.
 
We didn't take ourselves (or politics) as seriously. There were more jokes, less of the 'chimps throwing poop'.

This is not to reopen an old wound or assign blame, but I think it got worse from 2017 onward. Not to mention the incident with Billy.
I'd like to know more about the incident with Billy, but you said not to mention it.
 
I might be misreading but I'm not sure what you are saying you miss.....is it unfounded buffoonery you miss, or the opposite?
Any buffoonery, doesn't matter if it was unfounded. Hell, we had a thread that was created just for the purpose of giving people likes so we could all have more likes than non OOTB people.
And the M1 vs. M2 thing intrigues. Can you expound on that a little. I'm always up for ranking women, so to speak
I'm still not really clear on it. It's been explained countless times and I don't think anyone really understands it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
We didn't take ourselves (or politics) as seriously. There were more jokes, less of the 'chimps throwing poop'.

This is not to reopen an old wound or assign blame, but I think it got worse from 2017 onward. Not to mention the incident with Billy.
I would say around 2016, because it started to creep in a few months before the election. It just exploded in 2017.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dadika13
@toophly1124 what's that avatar? Looks like a cool version of Peter Quill. Or maybe a tie-fighter pilot that defected to be a hippie (tie-dyed no pun).
 
I might be misreading but I'm not sure what you are saying you miss.....is it unfounded buffoonery you miss, or the opposite?

And the M1 vs. M2 thing intrigues. Can you expound on that a little. I'm always up for ranking women, so to speak.
It’s a method of ranking women it was first invented on another board.
 
I miss the days where we all agreed Gary was an arrogant blowhard and trolled him relentlessly.
who is/was Gary and over what was he trolled so heavily?

ETA ( 'A' for ask); if we had a woman-ranking thread, would you be a rankee or a ranker? Both? Would it be fair to rank yourself?
 
The Pope helped Biden steal the election, so he's not a Trump fan.

You laugh, but I really did see someone say that on another site.
actually, I'm pretty sure that I read a credible story that the Pope had harshly criticized Trump by name. That's one for Trump, AFAIC. I don't know about helping Biden steal the election, but he would have to have gotten in line for that.

The last decent Pope was the Polish guy. He just hated the commies, as we all should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
is it supposed to be an improvement over the usual 1,2,3...method?
You still use numbers. I should have clarified that it's women in a picture. So you would be ranking who is the hottest in the picture using numbers. The different methods were the order of the number based on the position of the women in the picture.
 
You still use numbers. I should have clarified that it's women in a picture. So you would be ranking who is the hottest in the picture using numbers. The different methods were the order of the number based on the position of the women in the picture.
this sounds very familiar to me. I think I've participated in this, here or elsewhere. Sounds like something a creative poster such as yourself might re-institute.
 
this sounds very familiar to me. I think I've participated in this, here or elsewhere. Sounds like something a creative poster such as yourself might re-institute.
now I remember. There would be a row of ladies, and we would rank them left to right in order of preference, like 6,3,5,4,1,2. I would participate in this again, but this time it would be for the purpose of providing examples of how not to objectify women.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Heelicious
I miss those days on OOTB. Where every response and every thread was nothing but that. That's when it was at it's peak. It's so bad now that people don't even have debates about post vs poast or damnit vs dammit. Hell, I can't even remember the last time we had a rank'em thread or tried to figure out the M1 vs M2 method (which I still don't completely understand) when ranking women.
It’s poast and dammit you ole fool
 
calm down a little. I wasn't referring to you specifically. That's why I said 'there's a lot of that going on here' instead of 'he does that a lot'. That being said, I do not at all respect those who never offer any actual rebuttal, but rather respond with unfounded buffoonery. It was a generality.

So far as what @randman1 posits, I take it for what it's worth. Sometimes that's worth noting, other times maybe not so much...but either way I don't shit my pants over anything anyone posts here, and I don't understand why others are so bothered by what they contend is lunacy. Like @gunslingerdick says, it's entertaining to see the panties getting all wadded up over what they contend isn't worth getting their panties in a wad over.

Regarding what you question as being wise....if it's that outrageous, is it wise to lend it credence by asking if it's wise to post it?
Well there’s plenty of panties getting in a wad to go around for errrrrrbody. You share my disdain for people ignoring or denying the science of the climate. I can attribute an issue to most everyone in here that triggers them. For me it’s lying about Covid. I’ve seen you in your share of pissing matches. No judgement, just an observation
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT