'nonexistent? Case in point. Nowhere did I see the word 'nonexistent' in the verbiage provided. The constituents mentioned I'm pretty sure exist. One can turn the narrative whichever way one wants to, but to imply nonexistence of the parties mentioned when nothing of the sort was indicated is exactly the kind of one-sided version of the truth that I'm talking about.
Did it occur to you at all to just let the words provided tell their tale without your biased interpretation? Did it occur to you to mention that Vance made sure to point out that the accounts of his 'existent' constituents is what formed the basis of the 'illegals eating pets' story? No, of course it didn't.
A lib would rather walk around the block to tell a lie than to stay where he is and tell the truth.*
*@heelmanwilm, this is an exaggeration for effect. But you can choose to call it a lie if you so desperately need to do so. Jesus loves you either way.
You are pretty sure? Lol.
If they existed, JV Vance could easily provide the names. People have asked his office for the names. They either don't have any names or need to create the constituents.
Here's another simple way to know that they are lying their asses off. They claim 20k Haitians have taken over Springfield, OH while the entire state of Ohio only has 5200 Haitians.
JV Vance and Trump simply think all of their supporters morons and will believe any nonsense they decide to spew.
In the case of Springfield, there is a fair debate to be had on the resettlement program. It's been great for business and economic growth but it's also stressing services. All of that is fair game for serious politicians- unfortunately both trump and JV are not serious politicians.