He is as bad as the guy who can not be named and will never be heard from again, tic tok...
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
when a joke is supposedly taken to be serious by that crowd, it's called desperation. They seek salvation wherever they might find even a smidge.
Biden hates Kamala. Has to. There is no other rational explanation of why he is doing some of the things he’s doing. He’s pissed they ousted him and he never liked Harris. And I agree, he knows she’s an idiot and incapable of doing the job. He’s sabotaging her campaign as a “f*ck you” to the machine that screwed him.
bold strategy, calling a woman a racist who acknowledged making the beast with two backs with Glen Rice.
One minute you guys are calling Biden a senile old man who is too decrepit to put two logical sentences together. Then he says something stupid like this and you're trying to equate that with the Trump oeuvre of idiotic comments? Yeah, right.
All those millions of undecided voters are suddenly aware that Trump is for unity and Biden is for hate.
The whole control the weather thing ranks up there with the moon landings being in some secret movie set for me. But, I do wonder about one aspect of the topic that seems to be an inconsistency. I'm supposed to think that man made efforts could not possibly impact or somehow influence anything in regard to a singular storm, but I am supposed to believe and not ever question that human activity is the singular reason for and has direct impact on the entire alleged change in the overall climate such that human behavior must be modified to an extent that it will forever change life as we know it. Just seems like it would be the other way around.Cuz the government can control the weather and you don't want that in the wrong hands.
See above. You believe people control climate change, but that individual weather can't be? I'm not even gonna ask you to reconcile those two possibilities.How did you put it a couple of weeks ago? They claim the government can control the weather but believe climate change is a hoax.
He gave you a book reference. Have you read it yet?
It's very interesting.
Who you gonna believe? Woodward or some FOX talking head?
So, the standard is that you need to get PARENTS PERMISSION for using a child's likeness, but parents don't need to be involved in issues impacting the very development and direction of those same children? This pretty much summarizes the entire issue with the extremes of the D party. How about parents being involved with everything involving their kids? When did that become a non-thing?
Hey look, fours years after an event, a week before an election involving He Who Must Not Be ReElected is happening, this story breaks. Wow. They must have finally got the pictures back from the drugstore. Those guys take forever.
New California law bans rules requiring schools to notify parents of child’s pronoun change
Newsom signed a law barring school districts from passing policies requiring schools to notify parents if their child changes their gender identification.
www.kpbs.org
There wasn't an A and a B, so I have no idea to what you are commenting. However, it's nice to know that you don't think parental involvement versus schools and other government representatives isn't "serious stuff". Proves my entire point. Appreciated.
It's easy to see who has children on this board and who doesn't.New California law bans rules requiring schools to notify parents of child’s pronoun change
Newsom signed a law barring school districts from passing policies requiring schools to notify parents if their child changes their gender identification.
Typical. SOP for TDS and your posts.
First, it's not Trump, it was Musk's PAC.
Second, the reference to the "c-word" is used to catch the viewer's attention and then you are given the actual word - Communist.
I'm gonna chalk this up to you not actually seeing the ad and relying on your crack sm sources for your news, or just that you have a five second attention span and never made it to the part where they gave you the actual c-word.
This is a knee jerk reaction to another law in Calif school districts REQUIRING schools to notify parents if their kids want to be referred to with different pronouns. All of it is stupid af. First off a school should use whatever the fuk pronoun they feel is appropriate. Not the kids. I would make an exception if the parents step in. If a parent feels it’s best for their kid to be called something different then I would support that. In other words, if you’re a kid that wants to be referred to with diff pronouns you should go to your parents and your parents to the school.
Kneejerk reaction to a law stating they must be notified of happenings in their child's life? Asking for parents to be notified of things having to do with their children elicits a "kneejerk reaction"? Jesus...
This is an interesting statement. I think I agree. The only issue is batshit crazy, loser, teachers and administrators with their own agenda aren't making sound decisions.
Similar threads
