Too many secrets by big gubment.Anyone out there even care about all this drone stuff that's been going on?
no response yet? This ought to do it...
This too, Racism is dying.no response yet? This ought to do it...
the Civil War was about States' rights, not slavery.
lol yeah, I honestly first had included that as well, but I thought better of it because I didn't want him to stroke out before he could get back here.This too, Racism is dying.
No sir. They are both intertwined. Slavery was the main issue with states using the concept of "states rights" to maintain slavery. States Rights is a term used to mask true motivation for preserving slavery. They cared more about there economy than they did about human rights and were willing to go to war over it. So much that slave owner applied for and received reparations for lost economy after slavery. The concept of "states rights" or "giving the issue to the states" is still used as justification for concepts even today.no response yet? This ought to do it...
the Civil War was about States' rights, not slavery.
No sir. They are both intertwined. Slavery was the main issue with states using the concept of "states rights" to maintain slavery. States Rights is a term used to mask true motivation for preserving slavery. They cared more about there economy than they did about human rights and were willing to go to war over it. So much that slave owner applied for and received reparations for lost economy after slavery. The concept of "states rights" or "giving the issue to the states" is still used as justification for concepts even today.
There it is. That's the post.
No sir. They are both intertwined. Slavery was the main issue with states using the concept of "states rights" to maintain slavery. States Rights is a term used to mask true motivation for preserving slavery. They cared more about there economy than they did about human rights and were willing to go to war over it. So much that slave owner applied for and received reparations for lost economy after slavery. The concept of "states rights" or "giving the issue to the states" is still used as justification for concepts even today.
There it is. That's the post.
here it is. Go back and review about 500 posts going back several years and then realize that getting into the tail end of something is not the time to try to correct someone about things you have no awareness of. Or better yet, just read a few posts back and grasp that there is a newer, but related dynamic going on that you have no recognition of either.No sir. They are both intertwined. Slavery was the main issue with states using the concept of "states rights" to maintain slavery. States Rights is a term used to mask true motivation for preserving slavery. They cared more about there economy than they did about human rights and were willing to go to war over it. So much that slave owner applied for and received reparations for lost economy after slavery. The concept of "states rights" or "giving the issue to the states" is still used as justification for concepts even today.
There it is. That's the post.