Terrible President. He vowed to fundamentally change America and we’re seeing the results of his policies as Obiden continues them.Change of pace
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Terrible President. He vowed to fundamentally change America and we’re seeing the results of his policies as Obiden continues them.Change of pace
Terrible President. He vowed to fundamentally change America and we’re seeing the results of his policies as Obiden continues them.
Maybe because he is.And he’s a garbage basketball player too. Why does he look so faggy in everything he does?
if it walks like a duck...Maybe because he is.
He needs to go back to ****ing hookers and doing blow. His game was much better when he was doing that.tiger, by all accounts was great, but in reality was/is a total pos…did great things for kids, the sport, etc…but he’s as slimy as clinton, edwards, trump, jfk, etc…the guy is still revered, possibly because it’s a fall from grace/comeback story
'he's got more LLC's than John Gotti's wife', lol..
it's her birthday, and he rightfully acknowledges it. Hell of an intentional oversight by you to ignore that he is in this bullshit circumstance only because of demlbs weaponizing justice for political purposes. JMO, but to me the right-minded would be harping on this instead of on someone saying happy birthday. If he could have, I'm sure he would have wished her a public happy birthday in a different setting.Hell of a flex by trump to wish his wife happy birthday from the steps of the courthouse where two of his mistresses will be testifying
Yeah... he didn't actually have affairs with these women and pay them. It's all a big fantasy created by "the dims." I mean, the two women have confessed-- in great detail, by the way-- to it. Michael Cohen already served time for his culpability, and being found guilty, in the crime. But, it's all just hearsay and BS... and, of course, the "weaponizing of the DOJ."it's her birthday, and he rightfully acknowledges it. Hell of an intentional oversight by you to ignore that he is in this bullshit circumstance only because of demlbs weaponizing justice for political purposes. JMO, but to me the right-minded would be harping on this instead of on someone saying happy birthday. If he could have, I'm sure he would have wished her a public happy birthday in a different setting.
The current insanity we endure includes derision directed toward someone's happy birthday wishes to his wife.
The only good thing is that TIL that 'mistress' doesn't mean what I thought it meant.
LOL! I look forward to the cross examinations. That's where the fireworks are going to really gonna happen.Hell of a flex by trump to wish his wife happy birthday from the steps of the courthouse where two of his mistresses will be testifying
Hell of a flex by trump to wish his wife happy birthday from the steps of the courthouse where two of his mistresses will be testifying
I almost think my wife would forgive me.LOL! I look forward to the cross examinations. That's where the fireworks are going to really gonna happen.
Hell of a flex by trump to wish his wife happy birthday from the steps of the courthouse where two of his mistresses will be testifying
Jesus fuking christ it’s a joke not a dick. Don’t take it so hardit's her birthday, and he rightfully acknowledges it. Hell of an intentional oversight by you to ignore that he is in this bullshit circumstance only because of demlbs weaponizing justice for political purposes. JMO, but to me the right-minded would be harping on this instead of on someone saying happy birthday. If he could have, I'm sure he would have wished her a public happy birthday in a different setting.
The current insanity we endure includes derision directed toward someone's happy birthday wishes to his wife.
The only good thing is that TIL that 'mistress' doesn't mean what I thought it meant.
I hear she’s on trumps short list for VP. Wonder if this hurts her chancesEven if you think she was right about killing the dog, why would she put this in the book? Is there not a better example for her to use?
Kristi Noem describes killing dog after bad hunting trip in new book
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) in a forthcoming book describes shooting a family dog after a hunting trip, according to a report in The Guardian, which obtained a copy of the book, “No Going Bac…thehill.com
You have a "special" relationship with Donald Trump. Or at least you wish you did.Hell of an intentional oversight by you to ignore that he is in this bullshit circumstance only because of demlbs weaponizing justice for political purposes.
I’ll give credit where it’s due. Trump has fukked some hot babes. Most of them consensually evenI almost think my wife would forgive me.
get a grip dumbass. He's not there because he screwed some women.Yeah... he didn't actually have affairs with these women and pay them. It's all a big fantasy created by "the dims." I mean, the two women have confessed-- in great detail, by the way-- to it. Michael Cohen already served time for his culpability, and being found guilty, in the crime. But, it's all just hearsay and BS... and, of course, the "weaponizing of the DOJ."
Totally not a cult.
but not as 'special' as your relationship with Joe Biden.You have a "special" relationship with Donald Trump. Or at least you wish you did.
I know... Michael Cohen didn't go to jail because Trumped screwed them, either.get a grip dumbass. He's not there because he screwed some women.
really? You know? Then what was your point in expressing this?I know... Michael Cohen didn't go to jail because Trumped screwed them, either.
Yeah... he didn't actually have affairs with these women and pay them. It's all a big fantasy created by "the dims." I mean, the two women have confessed-- in great detail, by the way-- to it.
Just to emphasize that it happened. It's no witch hunt. Truth be told, you and the rest of the cult don't care that he used campaign funds to shut them up. You don't care how many laws he has broken, or will break. Just like he said, he could shoot someone and not lose any voters.really? You know? Then what was your point in expressing this?
Just to emphasize that it happened. It's no witch hunt. Truth be told, you and the rest of the cult don't care that he used campaign funds to shut them up. You don't care how many laws he has broken, or will break. Just like he said, he could shoot someone and not lose any voters.
I'm sure shooting animals makes her more popular with Trump supporters.I hear she’s on trumps short list for VP. Wonder if this hurts her chances
Shooting animals is very popular among many Dim voters too, they just prefer the inner city two-legged type. To each his/her/its/their own I guess.I'm sure shooting animals makes her more popular with Trump supporters.
Maybe so, in an indirect way. I'm sure the yellow headline will be what many libs form an opinion on without reading the article. What I got from it was the point being made, buried some paragraphs down, below several others reiterating the misleading suggestion that the dog was shot due to a 'bad hunting trip'...I'm sure shooting animals makes her more popular with Trump supporters.
some limp-dick jokeJesus fuking christ it’s a joke not a dick. Don’t take it so hard
do you believe that?Maybe so, in an indirect way. I'm sure the yellow headline will be what many libs form an opinion on without reading the article. What I got from it was the point being made, buried some paragraphs down, below several others reiterating the misleading suggestion that the dog was shot due to a 'bad hunting trip'...
"The Guardian wrote that the story was told as an anecdote to show that Noem believes sometimes difficult tasks must be carried out, and that she is not afraid to do so. Noem uses the story to illustrate that she is willing to do anything “difficult, messy and ugly” if it simply needs to be done, according to The Guardian."
The willingness to deal with unpleasantness head-on is what would make her more popular with Trump supporters.
WowShooting animals is very popular among many Dim voters too, they just prefer the inner city two-legged type. To each his/her/its/their own I guess.
You mean it's sort of on par with the impeachment of Bill Clinton? Both trivial offenses, imo, but because of the stature of the offenders, they got a lot of attention.It's a witch hunt, but not because he did something that could not be twisted into an illegality. It's a witch hunt because no one else would be in court for what he did, a technicality that no one gives a shit about, including any D.A....unless the target happens to be Donald Trump. Of course you deny that in spite of the fact that people actually campaigned on a vow to target him, including Letitia James.
stern is the bestThe Howard Stern interview of Joe Biden (available on Youtube) is excellent regardless of political tribe to which one is aligned.
I believe that I read the words printed and that nothing in them counters anything I've said. If one believes anything beyond that, it's because they are reading into it what they want to believe.do you believe that?
no, it isn't on par with the impeachment of Clinton because here we're talking about criminal charges that are tying Trump up and keeping him from campaigning. Additionally, and as I said, if he wasn't the object of dem persecution, he wouldn't have even sniffed a courtroom. It isn't equal justice if you don't put EVERYBODY on trial for aberrant bookkeeping, and there would be thousands of cases in NY alone if the DA actually cared about that as a crime.You mean it's sort of on par with the impeachment of Bill Clinton? Both trivial offenses, imo, but because of the stature of the offenders, they got a lot of attention.
Which side do you think was more witch-hunty? To me, the Clinton foes win that, hands down. They were in full faux-rage long before he effed up and perjured himself - which, let's face it, is the only thing he did wrong from a legal perspective.
As a lefty, I don't care if Trump screwed porno stars. And I don't care if he paid them hush money. The real issue, to me, is whether that money is correctly considered a concealed campaign expense in violation of the law. My answer to that is "of course it is." BUT, I think that's nearly impossible to prove, and Trump will probably skate.
Meanwhile, cons on the Supreme Court are twisting themselves in knots to delay the serious cases against Trump to minimize harm to him before the election. Shameful. And stupid, imo, since it's highly unlikely that the juries on those cases won't have at least one Trump supporter willing to exonerate him regardless of proof. But I guess they don't want to run even that slight risk.
now THAT is how hush money is supposed to work. She hushes against you, we pay to make that happen. And the beauty of it is, is that it allows the questionable behavior being hushed up to continue unabated.
I imagine both parties are "behind it", there being no end of indecent behavior on the part of both parties. Doesn't excuse the use of public funds to cover up that behavior. Since that money was taxpayers' money, I believe we have the right to know the exact details of these hush money payments, who to, what for, and on the part of whom.now THAT is how hush money is supposed to work. She hushes against you, we pay to make that happen. And the beauty of it is, is that it allows the questionable behavior being hushed up to continue unabated.
I didn't read the entire article, but I'm sure it explains that the dems are behind it, it being so hypocritical and all.