C'mon dude, you can't be this gullible. He wanted to listen to YMCA at the end of his "townhall" to calm the cultists. LMFAO. Good grief.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
C'mon dude, you can't be this gullible. He wanted to listen to YMCA at the end of his "townhall" to calm the cultists. LMFAO. Good grief.
Answer this question to the best of your abilities. Why has the trump campaign flooded the polls (538) with over 60 sponsored polls over the last few weeks?
Tell it to the blowhard who is trying his best to make you guys seem more righteous than us. You can reach him at @pooponduke.
One of your own posted an article proving what happened. You sheep much Junior?
Don't worry, in just a few days Harris' astroturf campaign will come crashing down.
No one has denied a couple of cultist losers dropped. That has nothing to do with gramps "dancing" for 39 minutes instead of answering a simple question about Healthcare.
It's ok Junior, just go to your safespace. Uncle Donald will be in charge soon.
Glad to see you now know when you're making a fool of yourself. Congratulations on your personal growth.
Was that your best explanation of why the trump campaign is sponsoring and dropping over 60 polls over the last few weeks? Lol.
I'll give you a clue, it ends with you being arrested in D.C.
this was good and there is a wealth of like information out there for anyone interested. Sure it has been changed over time just like anything else, but it still is fundamentally based on the power of sovereign States to hold their own against each other rather than the majority. That's why the States provided electors.
The question about an EC working within States is interesting but irrelevant, IMO. Counties are generally not assigned sovereignty and given political space from each other. They are pretty much just independent units of administration but not independent beyond that. The notion of sovereignty connotes separation without but not within. If Hawaii enacts a law that says women can go topless any place and time that they care to, then that's the law in Hawaii but not in Oklahoma. Contrarily, each county tends to have it's own sheriff but that sheriff enforces the same law that the next county's sheriff does.
And that brings up what I said about doing away with the vestiges of sovereignty, now that that idea has been largely obliterated. How often do you hear about some murder case going unsolved because the murder was committed in one jurisdiction but the perp lived in a different one, and the two LE agencies just didn't communicate well., It would tend to be more efficient and more successful if one LE agency handled both. That kind of thing, and there are many more areas that this applies to. So that sort of helps your argument but it also helps illustrate why it's a bad idea. An independent LE agency can develop better procedures and those procedures can then be adopted by other agencies, whereas all LE operating under one umbrella will tend to become slaves to the blanket operation in place, with personal advancement becoming political instead of merit-based.
If you dig deeper, I think it really comes down to encouraging and supporting individuality over the mass majority. 'merica.
eta; I re-read my post and I think it gives you too little credit for the video you provided. The points in it are well taken by me.
Last edited:
I don't have to ask @pooponduke. I know we are more righteous. I was being generous just for the sake of keeping the argument on point..
you're too stupid to realize that there's nothing contradictory in what you quoted. Maybe if you had a smidge of reading comprehension.
However, as to what you're trying to pull here, did you stupidly forget to quote me in entirety? Or are you just a lying sack of excrement?. OF COURSE you are a lying sack of shit, you always have been.. The real question is can you actually be so stupid as to try to pull off your out-of-context trick again when it has failed so many times before?
One thing is inarguable. You're far too stupid to stop trying too hard.
Yes, they are. They're states inside of states that choose all kinds of "rules" differently from each other.
na. Administrative rules are not laws. And they are nothing like states in anything like the sense that the States are. You can call any geographical area with borders a state if you want to, but you're just playing with words.
. . . . . . . .This is your brain. , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .This is your brain on Trump.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
It’s the only take needed. I’m not trying to win some argument with some, liberal Gen Z, queer. I don’t give a fu*k what you think. I’m not trying to change your mind. In fact, I like that you’re trying to convince yourself that he’s behind. Because it’s going to be more fun for me when he wins and I get to tell you to eat shit.
No... You can't call "any area" a state. Counties exist in states in the same way that states exist in the country.
I guess all the governors are Democrats because all of the big cities and their larger populations wind up electing them. That's not the case at all. And, they don't need any electoral college to attain the diversity.
Similar threads
