Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
Why are we even talking about this? What % of the population is transgendered enough to work thru processes with psychologists enough to get to the point where surgery is even something they want? And then of that tiny subset, how many are prisoners or migrants?Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
under any president, all kinds of shit happens that doesn't fit his/her philosophy. Then again, maybe it does as far as it goes and which might not be indicated by some simplistic blurb. In other words, do you want to try to make us believe that Trump went out of his way, as Kamala Harris boasts about having done, to see that all prisoners who applied could get a taxpayer-paid sex change? Good luck with that stupidity.
I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
Not.the arguments for the States to be represented in a national election have already been well made.
1. It depends on what you give up to have that (dubious) enhancement of the several protections against the tyranny of the majority. You can eliminate drunk driving deaths by eliminating driving. We have good protections vs tyranny of the majority.You and WWJD keep harping on the idea or theme that the EC isn't needed to have an impact on the TOM because of other mechanisms. First, what is wrong with the idea of having more than one method of keeping such an evil suppressed? When one fails, another kicks in.
Excellent point.I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
under any president, all kinds of shit happens that doesn't fit his/her philosophy. Then again, maybe it does as far as it goes and which might not be indicated by some simplistic blurb. In other words, do you want to try to make us believe that Trump went out of his way, as Kamala Harris boasts about having done, to see that all prisoners who applied could get a taxpayer-paid sex change? Good luck with that stupidity.
I have no problem believing that Trump does not disagree with a prison treating a trans like a trans socially and medically, as long as that means that in reality, and as common sense dictates, any sexual treatment is toward the actual sex and not what the prisoner wishes the sex was.
How desperate are you, to present this kind of nothingburger?
We're talking about it because Bozo poasted a tweet as some sort of gotcha attempt that the policy was in place during the Trump years as well. I was just asking his opinion on whether he thinks it's good policy or not, which sadly he couldn't even answer.Why are we even talking about this? What % of the population is transgendered enough to work thru processes with psychologists enough to get to the point where surgery is even something they want? And then of that tiny subset, how many are prisoners or migrants?
Can we debate something which matters?
I agree we should debate something that matters.
I really wonder if YouTube channels like BTC, Pakman, TYT, etc., have really thought this through. If Trump is removed from the American political theater, their content will suffer. I guess there's always something to rail against. But, Trump is the biggest media draw in the history of the United States.If you were still wondering why little whiney beta Trump is afraid to face Harris again.
And, Kari Lake is providing the best UVF natal care in the world.Trump may be the father of ivf but biden is the daddy of vhf
I really wonder if YouTube channels like BTC, Pakman, TYT, etc., have really thought this through. If Trump is removed from the American political theater, their content will suffer. I guess there's always something to rail against. But, Trump is the biggest media draw in the history of the United States.
Oh, I'm sure they all know how to play to their audiences and be prosperous.Have you heard about Fox? Lol. They crush their ratings complaining about the U.S. being too successful under Biden. The difference, I think BTC would gladly trade his channel in exchange for healthy GOP, run by sane normal people.
Oh, I'm sure they all know how to play to their audiences and be prosperous.
You really think Brian Cohen would remove his livelihood for a "healthy GOP?" Whatever that is? He's got a lot invested in his channel to just give it up.