Just yesterday while on the Harris campaign in Michigan, Liz Cheney said she and Kamala disagree on policy issues. That should come as no surprise since she is still a Republican conservative. She has endorsed the Vice President because she knows that Donald Trump's policies (at least the few that we know about) are much more outrageous.To all those posters who have ragged on Trump/Vance by pointing out JD's comments about Trump many years ago, that's fair. There are reasons, of course, but it's fair to point out the change in stance and position. I just wonder though, is that a standard that you are also willing to apply in the other direction? Hmmmm. I mean, with your new found love affair with the irrelevant, here is some commentary when she was actually relevant.
That's not what I'm talking about, pooptard.
"Wake up bro" and stop dreaming about cowboys.
so you're saying that dragging the notorious Trump-hater Cheney along is just for the purpose of having someone mouth some Trump-hate that she herself isn't coherent enough to convey? Na, that doesn't smack of desperation at all.Just yesterday while on the Harris campaign in Michigan, Liz Cheney said she and Kamala disagree on policy issues. That should come as no surprise since she is still a Republican conservative. She has endorsed the Vice President because she knows that Donald Trump's policies (at least the few that we know about) are much more outrageous.
Fun BOSIDE attempt you got there.To all those posters who have ragged on Trump/Vance by pointing out JD's comments about Trump many years ago, that's fair. There are reasons, of course, but it's fair to point out the change in stance and position. I just wonder though, is that a standard that you are also willing to apply in the other direction? Hmmmm. I mean, with your new found love affair with the irrelevant, here is some commentary when she was actually relevant.
fact not in evidence, as they say in court.Remember that whistleblower who had some dirt on ABC? That was fake.
maybe, if you're thinking only in terms of dem presidential terms....but if you're thinking in terms of a particular candidate, the dems have historically been punishing us twice in a row with their anointed nitwit. And when I say 'us', I mean ALL of us.I'm thinking Harris wins this yr, then with Trump gone (I assume this loss or his age will end his attempts) the next "R" candidate easily wins in 2028.
semantics. We are talking conservative opposition to insanity, who cares what name you want to give it.R & D balance is good, but you are talking about MAGA, not R.
yeah. Cheney was spot on, and verifiably so..Fun BOSIDE attempt you got there.
Cheney says:
"Radical Liberal"
"Left of Bernie Sanders"
Vance said:
"America's Hitler"
"moral disaster"
"reprehensible"
"idiot"
"total fraud"
hmmm any difference?
that's just an expectedly slanted take on the use of tariffs. Trump has been saying for years and years, in fact well before he first threw his hat in the ring, that we are being taken advantage of by foreign economies and that if he was president he would take steps to level the playing field. Those steps might cause some pain in the short term, but would hopefully be enough more beneficial in the long term to justify the pain that the dems will of course harp on without talking about the other side of the coin.
Just yesterday while on the Harris campaign in Michigan, Liz Cheney said she and Kamala disagree on policy issues. That should come as no surprise since she is still a Republican conservative. She has endorsed the Vice President because she knows that Donald Trump's policies (at least the few that we know about) are much more outrageous.
typical lib reaction to the level-headedness and practical nature of republicans.
Maybe birth control and abortions should be allowed only for liberals, in fact mandate them.typical lib reaction to the level-headedness and practical nature of republicans.
So you're trying to tell me that 538 is purposefully making their model less accurate, and then is openly admitting that their model is less accurate? Seems delusional.538 has admitted that they are adding bunk GOP sponsored polling into their average. OVER 70 of these polls have been added since August.
They are aware that these polls are nonsense but decided to add them anyways. It's as if, Nate Silver is now being funded by Peter Thiel... (which he is).
RIP your browser history. Weird.You've heard about those Nebraskan cowboys haven't you, @joeydavid? They're known as the most tender cowpokes on the plains. These buckaroos below are nctrannie and his fellow farmhands 'just being boys'.
This is one of the reasons I'm pro-abortion. It's rare that a secure two-parent household that cares about the wellbeing of their children and would help them grow into productive members of society would be getting an abortion.Maybe birth control and abortions should be allowed only for liberals, in fact mandate them.