No, it doesn't bother me that you think that.does it ever bother you that your fallback position is always one of ignorance and unqualified denial?
No, it doesn't bother me that you think that.does it ever bother you that your fallback position is always one of ignorance and unqualified denial?
it should, it's based on the observation of an astute observer. You fall back on tl;dr when you don't want to fall back on inanity. Either way, you fall back because there's no way you can go forward when you're just wrong.No, it doesn't bother me that you think that.
Tell the oncologist that RFK Jr. said "I can't trust you!" Hopefully, he tells them to go ahead and add some lead to their Jack-and-Cokes. Speed up the process.gotcha moment
I already KNOW you're FOS. I don't need more and more dissertations to hammer it home.it should, it's based on the observation of an astute observer. You fall back on tl;dr when you don't want to fall back on inanity. Either way, you fall back because there's no way you can go forward when you're just wrong.
can’t help you understand the joke if you can’t even see it.OK, let me point out the part of your post that doesn't make sense...
from here...
"you missed the joke. also, same guy that is somehow confused re: the “dangers” of cell phones and wifi. eta: but he’s 70 and can do pull-ups.
...to here
I saw that he was talking about not relying solely on a doctor's advice and then he was eating fast food I think. I have to assume that was supposed to be a joke but as a joke it was beyond lame and actually pointless.can’t help you understand the joke if you can’t even see it.
wi-fi signals and cell signals are both radio frequencies, so although they are utilized differently, they are much the same in nature. There are serious questions of their effect on health. Radar, which also uses radio waves, is suspected according to studies of causing cancer. I trust someone who cautions that exposure to a great deal of radio waves at the frequencies in question could be harmful to us....and I'm glad someone is bringing that caution to the forefront instead of kowtowing to those concerns that might rather see such info suppressed.what i can do is tell you he doesn’t understand the difference between cell phone and wifi exposure…he said he believes it’s the same, not my words, his…do you trust someone that believes that?
wait, you know I'm FOS for claiming that you use tl;dr and inanity to avoid admitting that you're wrong, when the proof is right there for all to see? LOL.I already KNOW you're FOS. I don't need more and more dissertations to hammer it home.
Fox News isn't a big boy? You trust it above all the others... it's the BIGGEST boy.So, it's turning out that Oprah's production company actually got payments totaling closer to 2.5 mil. And, there are other accounting issues involved with some crazy numbers for things like DoorDash. Apparently, there's some gaps as well and it's looking like many of those rally attendees, well, let's just say it wasn't necessarily a conspiracy that they were bused in and potentially compensated for being there. If it did indeed happen, this is stuff that should have been fully explored and exposed by the big boys like NYT, WaPo, ABC, etc. Instead, they were in the bag for KH and ran a massive diversionary campaign with her. I find it disturbing and sad that the most reliable and timely news sources are turning out to be social media. There is just no way to separate in real time what is near the truth and what is some quack with an X account. We shouldn't have to completely guess on things.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/op...mpaign-far-more-than-initially-claimed-report