I can pretty much assure you that it largely went where it wasn't supposed to go. Hell, the Bidens probably got half of that.
eta...alternate take; ask the Taliban where it went.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
eta...alternate take; ask the Taliban where it went.
he said it’s the same wave frequency, when it’s not.
i think a person eating fast food and washing it down with a coke is not someone that should be telling people how to eat right or how to incorporate a healthy lifestyle.
but he can do a pull-up…can you?
- We know that a hallmark of autism is dysregulation of brain development starting in the prenatal period. Childhood immunizations simply cannot explain what goes wrong during gestation.
- There is not a single ingredient in vaccines that can cause childhood brain development to go awry, and no animal study shows links between vaccines and the abnormal brain development seen in autism.
- There is no plausible reason vaccines could explain autism’s strong heritability (e.g., sharply increased incidence among siblings), or its strong male-to-female ratio of about 4 to 1.
- The vaccine schedule cannot possibly explain the steadily accelerating rates over time.
- And most importantly, every epidemiological study on the topic has confirmed zero association between vaccination status and the development of autism.
You love to poast shit with no links. I don’t understand why you do that. Instead of copying and pasting, you could have just poasted the link.
Thanks, I guess. But these are the types of conclusions and statements that seem logical and scientifically solid, until they aren't. I indicated before that I am out of my depth with this stuff and much of it is way over my head, so I am playing catch up. The point of all this is that there is nothing wrong with questioning and challenging this stuff. We do have a problem with something or a combination of somethings. It's why I think there is a distinction to be made about RFK in regard to what he really believes. He got on the wrong side of the D/media and became an enemy of the state. Then, he had the audacity to actually voluntarily sign up for the Gestapo. It's amazing that a guy who should be a darling of the D's (all-time great D family, environmental lawyer attacking corps., etc.) went to being on the top ten hated list.
As I understand it, some of these vaccines have some ingredients in them that are a no go, like mercury. And while they may theoretically be fine individually, it could be a problem being administered early during development, over time, and/or collectively with others. That type of stuff is what Kennedy harps on in terms of it needing to be looked at and studied. That's why I would describe him as not anti vax, but vax choice and pro safe vax. And none of that begins to touch on our food system.
The problem is that the politics and money in things always skews the results. So, when someone says things in conclusory terms of certainty like above, my cynicism kicks in to wonder how they can be so sure. It's like all those lawn signs you still see in front yards saying "In This House We Believe Science is Real". Until it's not the "science" they want to hear about. Things like a random made up six foot distancing rule, things like wearing a "mask" that turns out does nothing, and things like taking a vax and a gazillion boosters of the vax that decidedly does NOT keep you from getting what science said it was supposed to keep you from getting.
It's anecdotal, but all I can say for certain is that we are not getting healthier as a society. It doesn't seem to me to be a bad thing or make someone a quack to ask questions about that and even challenge many of the things we supposedly "know" all about.
Or just do both if you want to highlight part of something particularly long (because we know, tl:dr).
At least @blazers is still down for the debate and making an effort. He didn't take his ball and go home like one poster or pull a Jimmy Hoffa like another.
Similar threads
