I bet @Heels Noir is in that chat...
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
A moment of silence for the racist Joy Reid being fired.
Fugg that bald headed trick. Seeing her crying was absolutely exhilarating. For her to say her show had meaning is borderline retarded. Other than her money, WTF does her husband find attractive about that hooker? And to think there are people alive that thought her show was good. GD, those people are retarded as well.
Tag those retards you are referring to. @Heels Noir , @prlyles , @blazers , @strummingram , @What Would Jesus Do?
this is why I wanted Ross Perot to be president. The country should be run like a company striving to max the bottom line and not like a shortsighted couple who think credit cards are the solution to making all their hopes and dreams come true.
These whores have no limits.
whore is right, except I have more respect for a person selling their body for profit than I do for some lying POS who is selling whatever narrative pays off for him/her. With an actual pro, you at least see for real what you're buying into. I wouldn't waste ten seconds of my time reading that garbage above because not one word of it could be trusted. And if you're like me, what he was selling before is why, in this case as well as generally, you know he can't be trusted to present anything based on the truth of the matter. Don't even get me started on the hypocrisy of it.
Dems are not all liars and hypocrites. But all dems support and encourage lying hypocrisy, so I don't too much bother trying to make the distinction. They all just suck for being democrats.
The irony of calling someone a whore while your orange idol is trying to sell “green card privileges plus” from the Oval Office and simultaneously hawking his merch… Lol not to mention the scam crypto currency he setup for accepting bribes.
I guess him and Tapper have at least one thing in common. They both have a core base of idiotic suckers that will buy whatever bullshit they’re selling.
Hardly. You're smarter than limiting yourself to Noir style of thinking. Not everyone or everything is a light switch that presents the dichotomy of either hating Trump/loving Trump. I have made it abundantly clear that DJT annoys the crap out of me on a personal level and that I wish he'd cut out the constant grift with stuff like selling sneakers and cards as if he's a baseball player in 1965. None of that has anything to do with policy and the direction taken by our president, government appointees, and bureaucrats. And, if the last five weeks has shown us anything, the previous four years and what would have happened in the next four under Kackles should make anyone reconsider their orange hate.
And here's the thing. He's still the same narcissistic, opportunistic ahole that he was a year ago, four years ago, and ten years ago. However, as far as I know, he's never come out and said that he wouldn't hawk "his merch" or ragged on another politician for doing so, just to then turn around and not only do that exact thing, but try to make coin off of his own failure to do what he was claiming to do at the time. You can hate the guy all you want because no one is ever going to check all the boxes unless one runs themselves. But he is consistent in terms of what his overall philosophy is towards our country's direction. Ask yourself one question, knowing what you do about The Donald and how badly you think of him, what does it say about Biden and Harris that Orange won a sizeable majority over them? How bad were/are they? If the D's ran anyone, literally anyone, of a moderate nature that wasn't a fountain of far left progressivism, are we even having this discussion?
Btw, here's three minutes of consistency from 1988. That's the Donald of 37 years ago. The only difference from today is he speaks about Japan as they were the ones importing everything at the time.
And while we're at it, let's not forget to address an issue that seems to always get swept under the rug in the rush to scream about Trump.
Arguably the biggest, most impactful scandal ever in the history of American politics is the coverup by the press/media about our former president and the running of the White House for the past four years. It's bigger than turning their heads when JFK was sneaking Monroe in and out of the WH to bang her, it's bigger than not telling the American populace how truly disabled FDR was, it's bigger than Nancy covering for Ronnie at the end, it's bigger than Watergate, and it's certainly bigger than Slick Willy plowing interns.
All of the lofty accolades and great things that are said about the role of the press/media and how they are supposed to keep the politicians and government honest - the entire bedrock of the concept of the freedom of the press, it's all there for exactly the situation that we had previously. And they blew it. The press is supposed to expose all of that to keep them honest, not go along with it and cover it up by making excuses, or refusing to cover it. And, Jake Tapper is allegedly one of the absolute best. He's one of CNN's lead anchors and won all kinds of awards along the way. He's supposed to be out in the front of the pack screaming as loud as he can about what was really going on. Instead, he hid it and pretended it wasn't happening.
He was complicit and covered it up because it fit the preferred agenda at the time. In so doing, he violated every journalistic ethic there is and, now, is hawking a book about the opposite of what he did to simply "get his". The whores will probably give him a Pulitzer for it. And your response is to immediately run out a distraction that can be summarized as orangemanbad. You could have just said hitler.
Arguably the biggest, most impactful scandal ever in the history of American politics is the coverup by the press/media about our former president and the running of the White House for the past four years. It's bigger than turning their heads when JFK was sneaking Monroe in and out of the WH to bang her, it's bigger than not telling the American populace how truly disabled FDR was, it's bigger than Nancy covering for Ronnie at the end, it's bigger than Watergate, and it's certainly bigger than Slick Willy plowing interns.
All of the lofty accolades and great things that are said about the role of the press/media and how they are supposed to keep the politicians and government honest - the entire bedrock of the concept of the freedom of the press, it's all there for exactly the situation that we had previously. And they blew it. The press is supposed to expose all of that to keep them honest, not go along with it and cover it up by making excuses, or refusing to cover it. And, Jake Tapper is allegedly one of the absolute best. He's one of CNN's lead anchors and won all kinds of awards along the way. He's supposed to be out in the front of the pack screaming as loud as he can about what was really going on. Instead, he hid it and pretended it wasn't happening.
He was complicit and covered it up because it fit the preferred agenda at the time. In so doing, he violated every journalistic ethic there is and, now, is hawking a book about the opposite of what he did to simply "get his". The whores will probably give him a Pulitzer for it. And your response is to immediately run out a distraction that can be summarized as orangemanbad. You could have just said hitler.
Project 2025 Is Alive and Well In the Trump Administration
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies. The memo began: “The federal government is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt. At the same time, it is not producing results for the American public. Instead, tax dollars are being siphoned off to fund unproductive and unnecessary programs that benefit radical interest groups while hurting hardworking American citizens. The American people registered their verdict on the bloated, corrupt federal bureaucracy on November 5, 2024 by voting for President Trump and his promises to sweepingly reform the federal government.”
Vought was a key author of Project 2025, the blueprint for a second Trump administration, and in July 2024, investigative reporters caught him on video saying that he and his group, the Center for Renewing America, were hard at work writing the executive orders and memos that Trump would use to put their vision into place.
more here:
heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
Most of us would agree with Vought's initial generalizations, but then he goes off the rails. And the way he goes off the rails does not bode well for Americans who aren't well off.
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies. The memo began: “The federal government is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt. At the same time, it is not producing results for the American public. Instead, tax dollars are being siphoned off to fund unproductive and unnecessary programs that benefit radical interest groups while hurting hardworking American citizens. The American people registered their verdict on the bloated, corrupt federal bureaucracy on November 5, 2024 by voting for President Trump and his promises to sweepingly reform the federal government.”
Vought was a key author of Project 2025, the blueprint for a second Trump administration, and in July 2024, investigative reporters caught him on video saying that he and his group, the Center for Renewing America, were hard at work writing the executive orders and memos that Trump would use to put their vision into place.
more here:
February 26, 2025
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies.
heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
Most of us would agree with Vought's initial generalizations, but then he goes off the rails. And the way he goes off the rails does not bode well for Americans who aren't well off.
Perhaps you can help me out since you're already in the know and can just cut to the chase. You complain about a group known as the Center for Renewing America writing proposed EO's.Project 2025 Is Alive and Well In the Trump Administration
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies. The memo began: “The federal government is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt. At the same time, it is not producing results for the American public. Instead, tax dollars are being siphoned off to fund unproductive and unnecessary programs that benefit radical interest groups while hurting hardworking American citizens. The American people registered their verdict on the bloated, corrupt federal bureaucracy on November 5, 2024 by voting for President Trump and his promises to sweepingly reform the federal government.”
Vought was a key author of Project 2025, the blueprint for a second Trump administration, and in July 2024, investigative reporters caught him on video saying that he and his group, the Center for Renewing America, were hard at work writing the executive orders and memos that Trump would use to put their vision into place.
more here:
February 26, 2025
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies.
Most of us would agree with Vought's initial generalizations, but then he goes off the rails. And the way he goes off the rails does not bode well for Americans who aren't well off.
Yet somehow, that means that Project 2025 is the blueprint for Trump which was not put out by them but was authored by The Heritage Foundation. Is one a subsidiary of the other or something? Or is it just Vought who is a member of both? So, your suggestion is that Trump can only have people who were never involved in The Heritage Foundation or that means he is pursuing P25? Or can Trump never do anything that also happened to be in P25 or he is somehow pursuing all the goals of the entire document?
This is just asking you to actually connect some dots rather than lazily parrot some bs from a substack column. Indeed, the absurdity of the author's assertions can be summarized in the following sentence:
"Musk appeared to be in charge of the first Cabinet meeting of the Trump administration today."
Anyone who claims that Trump isn't in charge is just a denier and a hater. I mean, I understand that you are used to a president who isn't present and decidedly not in charge. However, that's definitely not our President now. Besides, are you wanting it both ways or something? Is Trump pursuing P25 or not? You claim he's not even in charge of his own cabinet meeting. Which is it? At least decide on a claim, regardless of the reality.
Finally, when it comes to complaining about who is in charge of cabinet meetings, I'll just say thank goodness that Melania didn't have to be there for things to run properly.
yes, they are just flailing away hoping that one of their flabby appendages might actually knock something over.Libs right now
This morning I tuned in to C-span and witnessed one of the most disgusting such displays I can remember. There was being debated the repeal of the Biden last minute edict that only the higher-efficiency tankless water heaters were to be purchased and installed. This is a subject I know something about.
A republican used his time to point out the higher cost of the higher-efficiency 'condensing' type of TWH, and the elimination of any other choice that the edict entailed. This of course goes against the grain of conservative values. The speaker was unemotional and to the point and made his case clearly and factually. He spoke plain common sense.
Then a typical dem scumbag got on the soapbox to go hysterical and tell more lies in two minutes than Heels Noir could tell in a week, emphasizing the lib contention that this was like everything else that Trump was behind, nothing more than a ploy to further enrich his billionaire friends. It was incredible, the dishonesty and the distortions, and the turning of a subject that has little to do with Trump, into an insane and unwarranted attack on anything and everything that might be turned into a smear. And it wasn't just this one dem, as I thought it might be. After the next republican delivered another factual justification for repeal, another hysterical dem took the podium and managed to double down on the first dem's hysterical diatribe.
Watching these rejects behave so contrarily and unreasonably, you could have no doubt as to why we got into the shape we're in.
Just for the record, the non-condensing TWHs that Biden was outlawing are not inefficient, and what they use in fuel is only slightly more than the condensing type. And they are less complicated and less expensive, both for the equipment and for the installation. They are less likely to need repair and less expensive to repair if they should need it. In other words, having the non-condensing units available could help out those on a budget quite a bit. Yet the dem talking point was that Trump was just trying to sell more nat. gas to make his buddies even richer, to the detriment of those who had that choice eliminated by Biden/dems. . I wanted to puke.
the stupidity never ends. "Make no mistake: This order transforms federal spending by taking it away from Congress, where the Constitution placed it, and moves it to the individual who sits atop the Department of Government Efficiency."Project 2025 Is Alive and Well In the Trump Administration
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies. The memo began: “The federal government is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt. At the same time, it is not producing results for the American public. Instead, tax dollars are being siphoned off to fund unproductive and unnecessary programs that benefit radical interest groups while hurting hardworking American citizens. The American people registered their verdict on the bloated, corrupt federal bureaucracy on November 5, 2024 by voting for President Trump and his promises to sweepingly reform the federal government.”
Vought was a key author of Project 2025, the blueprint for a second Trump administration, and in July 2024, investigative reporters caught him on video saying that he and his group, the Center for Renewing America, were hard at work writing the executive orders and memos that Trump would use to put their vision into place.
more here:
February 26, 2025
This morning, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and Office of Personnel Management acting director Charles Ezell sent a memo to the heads of departments and agencies.
Most of us would agree with Vought's initial generalizations, but then he goes off the rails. And the way he goes off the rails does not bode well for Americans who aren't well off.
No, dumbass, Congress still decides what is to be spent and on what, and it never in fact had its hands on the actual spending. That's why there is an executive branch...to execute.
What the author is too dumb to comprehend is that the DOGE's function is to eliminate the practice of spending monies in ways Congress never intended. Doge is returning original purpose to Congress, not usurping it. It is doing exactly the opposite of what she contends. Idiot.
This is the part that the media and endless whinners NEVER talk about or fail to understand from the outset. The funding is decided by Congress but they almost never lay it out specifically how they want it implemented - it's always general with vast room for interpretation. For example, not once has anyone pointed out where Congress passed a spending bill that said something like we want 300 million to be spent by USAID that develops and provides a program to train children of Venezuela to play the pedophile version of Chutes and Ladders. The funding language would simply say to spend 300 million on foreign aid to develop better relations with Venezuela. Thus, technically, USAID might not have violated any laws, but they didn't do what was intended or expected either because no one (except the crazy, far, far left) would support the idea of developing and indoctrinating kids into a world of pedophiles.
The funding of Congress is provided and then the executive branch is supposed to implement it. The problem is that the fourth tier of government, the bureaucracy, has taken this responsibility from this elected branch and doesn't want to give that up. Indeed, a large amount of that group believe they are independent from and are not required to even follow the directives or guidance of the executive branch. They run the gov and they know better than our elected representative. And many of those implementations have taken on a political agenda that was never intended or authorized by Congress.
For example, as absurd as it sounds, it has been revealed that money was provided by USAID to develop a sesame street like show in Iraq. If someone can show that Congress actually funded such a specific program, I would suggest that everyone (regardless of party, etc.) who voted for that funding needs to be investigated for possible impeachment. At the very least, it's malfeasance.
I don't get it. Inequity in crash dummies? I thought the test engineer just told the dummy what gender it is supposed to believe it is during that specific test and they were able to cover all the possibilities. I mean, Dummies have no inner feeling telling them they are different from their birth assigned genders. Seriously, is purple hair complaining about the size of the dummies used? Is it because certain parts that we're not even supposed to use to define gender are not being molded into the dummies? What the hell is gender inequity in a car crash test?
More liberal BS. Identity politics and class warfare, it's all they have
Wait. I figured it out, purple hair wants them to stop simulating real life where they only do crash tests with guys driving if they've also got a lady turned and yelling at the guy, but they always do crash tests with ladies driving solo but putting on makeup? I kid, of course.
Seriously, is it a complaint that the bodies are molded more towards the size and shape of the average man versus the average woman? This is one of those things that would appear to be largely neutral. I just don't get it besides the idea of creating an issue where none exists.
Nope, that's what Dims do in congress. It's all true. Similar to when the Dim said an island could tip over if all its people got on one side.
what the hell is reason and common sense to a libtard?
it's just Trump trying to be racist Hitler and attempting to enrich his billionaire friends.
Similar threads
