I really don't know what happened here and what the guy truly thought or believed. First there was a manifesto, then there wasn't. Seems like an evolving narrative and attempt to manipulate things to fit whatever one's agenda might be.After moving to Minnesota about a decade ago, Boelter volunteered for a position on a state workforce development board, first appointed by then-Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, in 2016, and later by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz. He served through 2023.
From another article
The workforce board has about 60 members, many of whom are not politically connected or would have meaningful access to the governor or interactions with him. The workforce board is tasked with recommending policies to Walz and the Legislature.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of people apply to serve on these state boards, task forces, advisory councils and commissions each year. There are more than 130 in total, including high-paying jobs on powerful councils, but they mainly are volunteer positions.
Back to him being a typical evangelical right wing nutjob...
“The churches are so messed up, they don’t know abortion is wrong in many churches,” he said, according to an online recording of one sermon from February 2023. Still, in three lengthy sermons reviewed by the AP, he only mentioned abortion once, focusing more on his love of God and what he saw as the moral decay in his native country.
He appears to have hidden his more strident beliefs from his friends back home.
“He never talked to me about abortion,” Schroeder said. “It seemed to be just that he was a conservative Republican who naturally followed Trump.”
On the subject of his hit list...
The list also included the names of abortion rights advocates and health care officials, according to two law enforcement officials who could not discuss details of the ongoing investigation and spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
But sure... the lunatic evangelical minister who had abortion rights advocates on his hit list was actually a democrat. Seems totally plausible... If you ignore every single account from anyone who knew him and every single fact that has emerged from the investigation.
Just goes to show how easy it is to manipulate a low IQ dipshit like the one we have here.
The one thing I won't do, however, is blindly accept anything from sources like the AP, particularly when they allegedly speak to them "on condition of anonymity." In all seriousness, when the "press" cites such authority, whether it's the NYT or Fox, how do any of us have ANY assurance of actual truth or veracity? They could simply have made it up or been told it by their buddy over a couple of beers. If the last four years taught us anything it should be that the press, particularly the traditional msm, has more holes than a screendoor. Argue about it all you want, but take a quick spin through your hypocrite's book. Talking about your boy Jake Tapper. It's a challenge to figure out the truth about anything.