Whatever...... and, this was about a whole lotta nuthin' actually being said.
Whatever...... and, this was about a whole lotta nuthin' actually being said.
Well, my "fandom" is my own. How anyone else perceives it doesn't matter at all. They have their own fanaticism to maintain. There's no way to judge or measure that, either.You and I are about to get called fake fans, but I agree!
SJung put it into statistical format for you. UNC could beat anyone on any given day, but UNC's basketball team isn't anywhere close to being "the best team in the country."Whatever...
Nobody said it was a "reality" yet, but that it is possible for it to happen.Houston's net rating is +30.6
Tennessee's net rating is +28.1
UCLA's net rating is +27.5
Alabama's net rating is +26.9
Purdue's net rating is +25.8
That is a huge difference in the quality of the teams. That doesn't mean we can't beat the best teams. We almost beat Alabama. But in totality, we're not close. And the difference probably isn't playing "Carolina basketball" a little bit more.
...that has zero to do with what we could be, which IIRC is the point. SMDH.SJung put it into statistical format for you. UNC could beat anyone on any given day, but UNC's basketball team isn't anywhere close to being "the best team in the country."
As I said earlier... Technically, anything is possible. Too many if's and but's at the moment....that has zero to do with what we could be, which IIRC is the point. SMDH.
LOL, well OK then...LOLI don't understand how it's a reality that this team has shown it can be the best team in the country. To me, it's a very broad statement to say we can be as good as anyone if we continue to get better. That's the reality for like 30 teams in the country.
I also think things like "playing Carolina basketball" is playing the results. Weird that when we win or play well, it's mainly because we play "Carolina basketball" and when we don't play well it's because we don't play "Carolina basketball."
Everything based on reality indicates that this team is a mile away from the top teams in the country.
Our net rating is +18.2
Houston's net rating is +30.6
Tennessee's net rating is +28.1
UCLA's net rating is +27.5
Alabama's net rating is +26.9
Purdue's net rating is +25.8
That is a huge difference in the quality of the teams. That doesn't mean we can't beat the best teams. We almost beat Alabama. But in totality, we're not close. And the difference probably isn't playing "Carolina basketball" a little bit more.
Fair enough. It could go either way, but the potential IS at least there... we'll just have to wait and see what actually happensAs I said earlier... Technically, anything is possible. Too many if's and but's at the moment.
I agree but I also don't ever get to high after a win to a 2-15 team regardless of how we look!Fair enough. It could go either way, but the potential IS at least there... we'll just have to wait and see what actually happens
Yeah, so exactly who is getting "high" here?...I agree but I also don't ever get to high after a win to a 2-15 team regardless of how we look!
You can disagree with it. I don't know how it means nothing though.Nobody said it was a "reality" yet, but that it is possible for it to happen.
As for that net junk? Talk about a whole lotta nothing...
GMAB.You can disagree with it. I don't know how it means nothing though.
"Carolina Basketball" is not even a real thing. It's some tribal BS that's about as real as saying "The American Way." Playing as a team isn't exclusive to any specific team, it refers to ALL teams... when they play AS a team.
Every team says “we want to play (insert our team name) basketball”. It typically covers what?You and I are about to get called fake fans, but I agree!
Yes, I agree you can’t predict the future.GMAB.
It's not about "disagreeing". All that stuff just represents a pecking order if they were seeding teams now from the season SO FAR.
It means ZERO as to how the rest of the season will unfold... well, that is unless you WANT it to, which I'm starting believe you do.
I agree, but as I said before I can't help but give pause from thinking we are on the road to recovery ofter beating a 2-15 team!Every team says “we want to play (insert our team name) basketball”. It typically covers what?
- We want to play up tempo (because no coach would promote playing slow, unless maybe Tony Bennett)
- We want to play physically
- We want to play smart
- We want to play disciplined
- We want to rebound
- We want to play tenacious defense
- We want to play unselfishly
- We want to play together
I’m probably missing a few. But if that’s the definition of Carolina Basketball, I hope we play Carolina Basketball.
On an aside I do think pointing to the assister is a cool tradition.
Your posts are BS."Carolina Basketball" is not even a real thing. It's some tribal BS that's about as real as saying "The American Way." Playing as a team isn't exclusive to any specific team, it refers to ALL teams... when they play AS a team.
Sorry if I threaten your traditional perspective. It's not a real thing.Your posts are BS.
How'd that work out last season?Yes, I agree you can’t predict the future.
But I do think it’s a good indicator on what you are at the moment. And IMO that’s a better indicator on you’re going to do in the future rather than everyone’s individual opinions based on their perception of their reality.
Welp, that may have taken false equivalencies to a new level. Of course there are generic things all programs/coaches want to do, but I still find it puzzling how some here haven't yet grasped the archetype that Carolina basketball was and is.Every team says “we want to play (insert our team name) basketball”. It typically covers what?
- We want to play up tempo (because no coach would promote playing slow, unless maybe Tony Bennett)
- We want to play physically
- We want to play smart
- We want to play disciplined
- We want to rebound
- We want to play tenacious defense
- We want to play unselfishly
- We want to play together
I’m probably missing a few. But if that’s the definition of Carolina Basketball, I hope we play Carolina Basketball.
On an aside I do think pointing to the assister is a cool tradition.
This is the exact point that everyone who disagrees with you is making too. We can beat basically anyone on a given day. I'm just saying there's no indication we'll be anywhere near the best team in the country unless every team better than us is going to get worse and injured. That doesn't mean we can't win games in March.How'd that work out last season?
UNC got really hot at just the right time and the ball bounced in their favor a LOT. People fail to realize how spontaneous this sport can be, as well as how calculated. This idea that if you follow some unique formula... "The Carolina Way... then fortune favors your outcome. It doesn't. There are so many little factors that come into play. I will say that there is an element that is required to repeat those kinds of performances. And, UNC's basketball program manages to do that somewhat frequently.How'd that work out last season?
No, it is not. Literally none of the usual doubters on here gave us any chance of doing anything this time last season, but once Brady found hs niche and the staff schemed around the lack of a PG, our starting five at least proved to be WAY better than any of y'all would ever have acknowledged.This is the exact point that everyone who disagrees with you is making too. We can beat basically anyone on a given day. I'm just saying there's no indication we'll be anywhere near the best team in the country unless every team better than us is going to get worse and injured. That doesn't mean we can't win games in March.
Honestly, that is just silly, given that literally EVERY team to win championships started out at some point with POTENTIAL. That's what we're talking about here, after all. Let it go.Well... potential rarely gets a lot of banners or allows you to compete after you lose.
^^^Wow, this thread has rally jumped off in to crazy land! We have a poster that says Carolina Basketball does not exist, II guess the Earth is flat to? LOL
Have a poster telling us that teams do not win nattys that had potential? I didn't realize a team EVER won a natty that didn't have the potential to win it, they just realized more of their potential than other teams.
"Carolina Basketball" is not even a real thing. It's some tribal BS that's about as real as saying "The American Way." Playing as a team isn't exclusive to any specific team, it refers to ALL teams... when they play AS a team.
"Hard to believe" is what I specialize in, a lot of the time.This is just a really bad take. It’s hard to believe you’re a Tar Heel fan & are able to say “Carolina Basketball” is not a real thing.
Yeah... and, then they took it BEYOND just potential. Me let it go??? Look in the mirror.Honestly, that is just silly, gven that literally EVERY team to win championships started out at some point with POTENTIAL. That's what we're talking about here, after all. Let it go.
Dude... do you think I need your approval? I don't even want it. I was "pretty good" as long as I said what you wanted to hear, or you agreed with me? Sorry! Life throws balls and strikes. Sometimes people agree, sometimes they don't. Me being a "good poster" has not one little thing to do with how you judge what I choose to say/share.^^^^
You were a pretty good poster around here, now you are just trolling, what the heck happened?
Wow, you flat-out flunked that Logic course, didn't ya?Yeah... and, then they took it BEYOND just potential. Me let it go??? Look in the mirror.
I was teaching it.Wow, you flat-out flunked that Logic course, didn't ya?
Credit where it's due --- now THAT's funny.I was teaching it.
Yeah, I put him on ignore for the first time yesterday, and I have not even had any real dialogue with him. I just got tired of reading his shit.^^^^
You were a pretty good poster around here, now you are just trolling, what the heck happened?
I can't speak about anyone else. I don't really remember. I remember I consistently said last year that if Caleb was great in March, we could beat basically everybody. I'm guessing you're looping me into the usual doubters, but I was on "the right side" if you want to call that. But not important...No, it is not. Literally none of the usual doubters on here gave us any chance of doing anything this time last season, but once Brady found hs niche and the staff schemed around the lack of a PG, our starting five at least proved to be WAY better than any of y'all would ever have acknowledged.
THIS season, the team has more real potential, due to the obvious factors of experience and way more depth. The key is utilizing all that properly. The staff had a self-inflicted setback with the unfortunate offensive experiment, and fact is, our underachievement in "Net" and such thus far can be laid almost directly on that strategic faux pas.
Now we're recovering and moving past that, and those of us who do actual analysis here (as opposed to being stuck in preheld narratives) are simply pointing out progress when it happens, as well as where we can POTENTIALLY be, IF we continue that progress --- nothing more, nothing less.
Again... It's really quite simple, and I've already laid it out ad nauseum as to why those "objective measurements" of the past have little to do with the team as it stands today. Alas, that continues to escape those with the pre-held narrative thing. In a nutshell, we have functionally been in a whole new season since the holidays, (fortunately) playing with a whole different systemic approach than the nonsense we started with.I can't speak about anyone else. I don't really remember. I remember I consistently said last year that if Caleb was great in March, we could beat basically everybody. I'm guessing you're looping me into the usual doubters, but I was on "the right side" if you want to call that. But not important...
I actually think it's interesting to debate... Would you rather have just Brady Manek or Nance and Washington on this year's team? I'm pretty sure I'd rather have Manek.
And I'm confused about what is a "pre-held narrative" vs "actual analysis." Earlier in the season when RJ wasn't shooting the ball, I said he's more likely to shoot well the rest of the season than Caleb is because RJ's been a much more consistent shooter in his career. Is that a "pre-held narrative" because I'm taking his previous statistics and predicting how he'll perform based on them? Or is that "actual analysis" because I said something positive about RJ?
I don't think many people disagree with you that if this team plays their A game and maybe catches a couple of breaks, they can beat basically anyone. What I disagree with is that objective measurements of this team are worth nothing vs your actual analysis.
Imagine a world where you are so sheltered you have to hit an ignore button on a message board because you can take time simply not read what a poster might write much less engage in a conversation to debate topics. Isn't that the point of a message board?Yeah, I put him on ignore for the first time yesterday, and I have not even had any real dialogue with him. I just got tired of reading his shit.