I think Cadeau has become polarizing mainly because of the expectations that were placed on him before he stepped on campus. Not fair to him and comparison is the thief of joy. But people were calling him generational, the next great PG, potentially the best blah blah blah. And as of today, he isn’t that.
He wasn’t given the chance to just be a normal PG to some degree. I don’t really recall any other PG having the generational label attached before playing a game for UNC. And I’ll admit I thought it was really odd.
And of course if Cadeau had studs around him he’d be better and the team would be better. I just think of a generational player as someone who truly elevates those around him. But he’s not that and I think that’s ok. He’s a developing talented point guard.
But I think it’s gotten to the point where people on either side are pot committed to their opinion. So the pro Cadeau people will point out every awesome thing he does and assess blame to someone else when he makes a poor play. And those who are maybe tired of Cadeau will point out every bad play and look over some of his great plays.
And I’ll admit, I prefer a PG who could score 20 without it being a surprise. I think that makes your team harder to guard. I do think being in favor of the pass first PG is more nostalgia because the Cota and Marshall teams were really fun. In reality, the Marshall teams werent that great offensively relative to Roy’s best teams. Roy’s best teams were always led by PGs who could score and shoot.