ADVERTISEMENT

Quick stuff (Stanford game)...

gary-7

Hall of Famer
Jan 27, 2003
20,866
16,523
113
Parts Unknown
...and I had to take a breath before I wrote this one, because there's just no mitigating how bad this sucked.

Gonna start at the end (and please know I would've written this exact same thing if they had missed the last shot):

- Sure there are different philosphies of how to play these last-second situations, but IMO you just CANNOT afford to let a guy take the rock that close to the hoop unmolested. We have seen what happens over and over in history --- Danny Ainge and Ty Edney in the NCAAT, for example --- when you let a guy take the ball coast-to-coast. We were fortunate we got the stop at ND, and this time it bit us. With 7+ seconds a slight redirect ain't enough --- even on an early hand-off, you HAVE to anticipate and make him pick up his dribble with a shadow double and/or force him to the sideline.

OK... other stuff from my notes. Hubert was right at least that it wasn't just one thing thet went wrong today --- it was a bunch:

- This Stanford team is clunky at the handle, resorting to myriad push-offs, illegal screens and "happy feet" when forced to pick up dribbles (lordy at the travels), and wants to play slow. Point is, they were made to scramble against but the only wrinkle we threw in (other than one series of 44) was occasional pre-emptive doubles on their Big. By allowing them to play at their pace, they were able to work enough looks to make enough to keep us from getting out in transition.

- Speaking of transition, the only resistance they could offer was fouling (at least the ones that got called). We actually had 16 Fast Break points (home stat guy strikes again) but that needed to be more today. I did not like slowing to their tempo down the stretch.

- we know Raynaud is a skilled player, but good grief, we did some stupid sh*** to help him, like Wash leaving his feet or getting too close when he was 25 ft from the basket, and geez Lubin --- how the hell are you stuck in the paint when your man is alone at the arc and you know he can shoot?

- And just when this team seemed to be gelling defensively, just yikes at the breakdowns. How many times are ya gonna get punked on simple OB plays? Jackson in particular looked like a Freshman trailing behind #4 on simple actions several times, and even Seth got caught on his heels a time or two. In a lot of ways, those gaffes were self-inflicted difference-makers.

- RJ made a few shots today, and they were needed, but he is still far from back to assassin-mode. And as potent has Ian has been lately, hoo boy... yikes, not today.

- head-scrathing moments (again). Stanford's in Zone and we reverse to an advantage with ball going to Drake on the backside wing. Defense reacts leaving Tyson ALL ALONE in the corner next to him, but Drake ignores him while instead taking a dribble to force a shot. Later RJ ignores Tyson open in the other corner, again just an easy pass away, and turns and passes out. What the actual f***?

- any time Eliot was out any semblance of a half-court offense went away. TBH, he shouldn't have left the damn floor in the second half. That 12, 6 (not 5) and 6 line was much needed, but 25 minutes ain't enough.

- I did like the last play call to Seth, but not so fond of a few leading up to that one

Anyway, damn it! Every time we looked to pull away, one of the aforementioned f***-ups would reel us back in or let back them in. Just can't afford to play with fire. This one hurts and there's no way around it....
:mad:
 
The RJ ignore of Cade was something it seems like has happened a lot with him, like he’s doing the math on who is open rather than moving the ball…that is when he sees them at all. I hate that Seth seemed to be back in drift mode at times but he did get more decisive a couple times late. I have no idea why they went to RJ iso backing up to 30 feet mode but assumed it would end badly when they did.
 
Thanks G- good summation. The thing that really bothers me is the Heels were content to play Stanfords game. Slow, methodical, and taking advantage of their size. I just don’t get running the same defensive look at them 99% of their possessions. Change the dang look up from time to time. We just weren’t disruptive enough defensively. They got what they wanted when they needed it. Big teams are real trouble…
 
  • Like
Reactions: thompsjj
First off, credit to Blakes for making a big time shot to win the game. It was against UNC’s best defender. I thought he just made a big time play in a big moment. If you’re nitpicking, idk why Lubin just shows when Raynaud tosses it back to Blakes. I would’ve preferred a trap or an effort to get Blakes to stop or change direction. But if I’m being honest, Lubin probably fouls then because he isn’t quick enough to do so.

Unfortunately can’t say I’m surprised that this kind of performance happened. I think this is the reality of this team. They closer to a mid tier ACC team than they are conference contender.

In these kinds of games, the details matter late game. UNC makes 1 FG in the final 5:00. Granted it became a FT game but still, no close to this game offensively. Cadeau misses a FT. And RJ misses a wide ass open 3 in the final minute off of good action where Cadeau beats his man and forces RJ’s man to help. Last year, RJ probably makes that 3. This year, he clanks it and that probably would’ve been the dagger.

One thing about this team. I don’t think they’re an impose your will kind of team. They’re kind of quiet and somewhat passive. They definitely don’t have the DNA to impose their will for 40 minutes. I don’t know if that’s something that will change either. The leadership isn’t really there and I don’t know Hubert’s personality enough to know if they can take the personality of their coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sportscribe
We might have lost the double bye in the ACCT with this loss.

Can't afford to lose at Wake on Tuesday, but they haven't lost at home yet this year. Then again, they haven't played anyone good at home yet.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT