When are we meeting up for a game, friend?Nobody gives a flying fvck about Bill Clinton now, or Bill Cosby, as neither is running for the US Senate . .
LMFAO
Nobody gives a flying fvck about Bill Clinton now, or Bill Cosby, as neither is running for the US Senate . .
LMFAO
When are we meeting up for a game, friend?
I’m in Great FallsWe'll need a good game to watch, Ticket-man . . are you out in the Reston area ?
I’m in Great Falls
Sounds good.Awesome . . we'll do this sometime soon hopefully, let me check out the schedule and pick something out.
![]()
The senator should be asked to step down as he has also been accused of sexual assault.
^^^Source = George Soros. Call me skeptical....
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?Oh FFS. Do your own research then. If you're seriously skeptical about whether or not that picture is photoshopped then you are a moron.
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.Wtf are you talking about? The creator has admitted it was fake, Einstein. Are Republicans actually this dense? I guess that's why they'd use a tactic like this, seeing as it was over a decade ago and imbeciles like yourself still believe its real.
http://www.cracked.com/article/118_the-15-most-shameless-fake-photos-ever-passed-off-as-real/
https://thinkprogress.org/cincinnat...-franken-photo-deletes-original-9ca248b5e531/
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republican-columnist-uses-fake-franken-photo
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2009/7/6/750525/-
https://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2009/07/cincinnati-columnist-spanked-using-fake-franken-baby-photo
The real question is... Are you actually inventing memories in your head? Or are you just a shameless liar?
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha nice try.
https://www.mediamatters.org/resear...ears-joker-franken-with-doctored-photo/149789
^^^Source = George Soros. Call me skeptical....
Oh FFS. Do your own research then. If you're seriously skeptical about whether or not that picture is photoshopped then you are a moron.
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.
I didn’t claim that picture was real I claimed the one he’s admitted to taking was real. Read the post again dipshit.If you're going to have a conversation off in your own little world then that's fine. But we were clearly talking about the photo that YOU shared then claimed was real. Don't try to deflect because I just clearly proved you to be wrong/lying.
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.
I didn’t claim that picture was real I claimed the one he’s admitted to taking was real. Read the post again dipshit.
Did he admit to taking the pic that I poasted? No. Then pay better attention to the poasts and STFU. In your haste to call Louigi a moron I believe you just missed it. I will forgive you, this time.Damn you really are a liar. You literally didn't mention the photo of the reporter until you realized you had to dig yourself out of that hole. Louigi and I were clearly discussing the photoshopped bullshit you posted, then you replied...
"He has already admitted to taking the pic"
Sorry but no logical person is going to assume or even believe that you were talking about some completely different picture than the one being discussed.
Does any of this have to do with the tax plan... or are we doing that ol' whataboutism because people can't debate actual points and have to deflect to attacking character because debating policy doesn't work for them?
Did he admit to taking the pic that I poasted? No. Then pay better attention to the poasts and STFU. In your haste to call Louigi a moron I believe you just missed it. I will forgive you, this time.
Some people seem to destroy their own character just fine, and without any help. This discussion was sidetracked a long time ago.
Whataboutism is not the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. Its a deflection tactic where you try to move the conversation to a discussion about the transgressions of the other side. So if I'm criticizing Trump and you say "But what about when Bill Clinton did (x)" that is whataboutism. Another way of looking at it, Roy Moore's actions don't make Anthony Weiner any less of a scumbag. And vice versa.
Calling cleetus a moron for posting a fake picture and claiming it was real isn't whataboutism.
The picture I poasted is fake. There, I’m sorry if I offended you on your heavy flow day.The conversation was clearly about the photo you posted. The article I shared with Louigi was a story about that photo being fake. He then replied saying he was doubtful. You replied saying he had admitted the photo was real. Any logical person would assume you were talking about the same photo that we were discussing. Not some other photo that you literally had not mentioned once up until that point.
You were wrong about that photo being real. Just admit it instead of trying to pretend like you were talking about something when any intelligent person can see that wasn't the case.
I understand what whataboutism is, but thanks. Feel free to continue assuming I'm always referring to you though.
I was hoping there'd be a discussion on the pros/cons of the plan and debate the points as opposed to the people proposing the plan. I haven't gotten the chance to learn too much about it and would like to learn about it on its merits and not the tired old "oh a republican proposed it so it must be [perfect/garbage]"
The picture I poasted is fake. There, I’m sorry if I offended you on your heavy flow day.
Unfortunately, you're not fake. You're every bit as full of shit as you appear to be.The picture I poasted is fake.
Calling cleetus a moron for posting a fake picture and claiming it was real isn't whataboutism.