ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Tax Plan

a041a8275f81e283239fd18c5f742190-752x440.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyL
Nobody gives a flying fvck about Bill Clinton now, or Bill Cosby, as neither is running for the US Senate . .

LMFAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncboy10
^^^Source = George Soros. Call me skeptical....

Oh FFS. Do your own research then. If you're seriously skeptical about whether or not that picture is photoshopped then you are a moron.
 
Oh FFS. Do your own research then. If you're seriously skeptical about whether or not that picture is photoshopped then you are a moron.
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?
 
Looks like another deadlocked jury in the Bob Melendez bribery trial . . I love it.
 
He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?

Wtf are you talking about? The creator has admitted it was fake, Einstein. Are Republicans actually this dense? I guess that's why they'd use a tactic like this, seeing as it was over a decade ago and imbeciles like yourself still believe its real.

http://www.cracked.com/article/118_the-15-most-shameless-fake-photos-ever-passed-off-as-real/

https://thinkprogress.org/cincinnat...-franken-photo-deletes-original-9ca248b5e531/

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republican-columnist-uses-fake-franken-photo

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2009/7/6/750525/-

https://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2009/07/cincinnati-columnist-spanked-using-fake-franken-baby-photo

The real question is... Are you actually inventing memories in your head? Or are you just a shameless liar?
 
Wtf are you talking about? The creator has admitted it was fake, Einstein. Are Republicans actually this dense? I guess that's why they'd use a tactic like this, seeing as it was over a decade ago and imbeciles like yourself still believe its real.

http://www.cracked.com/article/118_the-15-most-shameless-fake-photos-ever-passed-off-as-real/

https://thinkprogress.org/cincinnat...-franken-photo-deletes-original-9ca248b5e531/

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republican-columnist-uses-fake-franken-photo

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2009/7/6/750525/-

https://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2009/07/cincinnati-columnist-spanked-using-fake-franken-baby-photo

The real question is... Are you actually inventing memories in your head? Or are you just a shameless liar?
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.
 
No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.

If you're going to have a conversation off in your own little world then that's fine. But we were clearly talking about the photo that YOU shared then claimed was real. Don't try to deflect because I just clearly proved you to be wrong/lying.
 
Pretty easy to follow the chain of events here...


Shows photosphopped image to be fake.

^^^Source = George Soros. Call me skeptical....

Denies image being fake based on the source

Oh FFS. Do your own research then. If you're seriously skeptical about whether or not that picture is photoshopped then you are a moron.

I call Louigi a moron for doubting that picture is fake.

He has already admitted to taking the pic. Are you and Billy dem staffer wannabes?

You claim he has admitted to taking a picture that was in fact photoshopped.

No ****tard, I was referring to the pic of him grabbing the reporters tits.

And this is where you finally decide to use google, found out you were dead wrong, then tried to pretend like you were talking about a photo that you haven't mentioned even once in this thread.

Fail.
 
If you're going to have a conversation off in your own little world then that's fine. But we were clearly talking about the photo that YOU shared then claimed was real. Don't try to deflect because I just clearly proved you to be wrong/lying.
I didn’t claim that picture was real I claimed the one he’s admitted to taking was real. Read the post again dipshit.
 
I didn’t claim that picture was real I claimed the one he’s admitted to taking was real. Read the post again dipshit.

Damn you really are a liar. You literally didn't mention the photo of the reporter until you realized you had to dig yourself out of that hole. Louigi and I were clearly discussing the photoshopped bullshit you posted, then you replied...

"He has already admitted to taking the pic"

Sorry but no logical person is going to assume or even believe that you were talking about some completely different picture than the one being discussed.
 
Damn you really are a liar. You literally didn't mention the photo of the reporter until you realized you had to dig yourself out of that hole. Louigi and I were clearly discussing the photoshopped bullshit you posted, then you replied...

"He has already admitted to taking the pic"

Sorry but no logical person is going to assume or even believe that you were talking about some completely different picture than the one being discussed.
Did he admit to taking the pic that I poasted? No. Then pay better attention to the poasts and STFU. In your haste to call Louigi a moron I believe you just missed it. I will forgive you, this time.
 
Does any of this have to do with the tax plan... or are we doing that ol' whataboutism because people can't debate actual points and have to deflect to attacking character because debating policy doesn't work for them?

Some people seem to destroy their own character just fine, and without any help. This discussion was sidetracked a long time ago.

Whataboutism is not the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. Its a deflection tactic where you try to move the conversation to a discussion about the transgressions of the other side. So if I'm criticizing Trump and you say "But what about when Bill Clinton did (x)" that is whataboutism. Another way of looking at it, Roy Moore's actions don't make Anthony Weiner any less of a scumbag. And vice versa.

Calling cleetus a moron for posting a fake picture and claiming it was real isn't whataboutism.
 
Did he admit to taking the pic that I poasted? No. Then pay better attention to the poasts and STFU. In your haste to call Louigi a moron I believe you just missed it. I will forgive you, this time.

The conversation was clearly about the photo you posted. The article I shared with Louigi was a story about that photo being fake. He then replied saying he was doubtful. You replied saying he had admitted the photo was real. Any logical person would assume you were talking about the same photo that we were discussing. Not some other photo that you literally had not mentioned once up until that point.

You were wrong about that photo being real. Just admit it instead of trying to pretend like you were talking about something when any intelligent person can see that wasn't the case.
 
Some people seem to destroy their own character just fine, and without any help. This discussion was sidetracked a long time ago.

Whataboutism is not the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. Its a deflection tactic where you try to move the conversation to a discussion about the transgressions of the other side. So if I'm criticizing Trump and you say "But what about when Bill Clinton did (x)" that is whataboutism. Another way of looking at it, Roy Moore's actions don't make Anthony Weiner any less of a scumbag. And vice versa.

Calling cleetus a moron for posting a fake picture and claiming it was real isn't whataboutism.

I understand what whataboutism is, but thanks. Feel free to continue assuming I'm always referring to you though.

I was hoping there'd be a discussion on the pros/cons of the plan and debate the points as opposed to the people proposing the plan. I haven't gotten the chance to learn too much about it and would like to learn about it on its merits and not the tired old "oh a republican proposed it so it must be [perfect/garbage]"
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
The conversation was clearly about the photo you posted. The article I shared with Louigi was a story about that photo being fake. He then replied saying he was doubtful. You replied saying he had admitted the photo was real. Any logical person would assume you were talking about the same photo that we were discussing. Not some other photo that you literally had not mentioned once up until that point.

You were wrong about that photo being real. Just admit it instead of trying to pretend like you were talking about something when any intelligent person can see that wasn't the case.
The picture I poasted is fake. There, I’m sorry if I offended you on your heavy flow day.
 
I understand what whataboutism is, but thanks. Feel free to continue assuming I'm always referring to you though.

I was hoping there'd be a discussion on the pros/cons of the plan and debate the points as opposed to the people proposing the plan. I haven't gotten the chance to learn too much about it and would like to learn about it on its merits and not the tired old "oh a republican proposed it so it must be [perfect/garbage]"

Independent analysis has shown it will blow a 2 trillion dollar hole in the debt despite cutting funds to education and medicare. The top 1% of earners receive approximately half of the benefits of this plan, while a significant number of low and middle class earners will see an increase in their taxes. Its a good old fashioned subsidy for the rich. It cuts the corporate tax rate nearly in half, which is the most expensive aspect of the bill by far. It also allows American companies to take a deduction for expenses incurred when offshoring their production. The monopoly man himself couldn't have come up with a more corrupt tax plan than the one we're seeing in Congress right now. Its being pitched as boon for the middle class when it quite clearly will redistribute more wealth up to the top 1% of earners in an economy that is already beyond a sustainable point of inequality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hark_The_Sound_2010
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT