The desperation of "Climate Change"...
- Thread starter NoleSoup4U
- Start date
Once a day? Dude you've posted 9 times in the past 90 minutes.
He's a slow driver. Likes to keep it in first gear.
Not one post a day. I usually just drive by, answer a bunch of posts, and then get on my merry way. I've actually stuck around a lot longer tonight that I have recently. I just don't have the time. It's nothing personal.
Finally! Something we agree on!!! I feel like the pilot light in hell needs to be re-lit!
People claim the cloud like trails left by jet airliners are chemicals being sprayed by the government to help control our minds and spread disease
And dammit how could i forget the best conspiracy of all!!!???
I've heard about that one before. Just didn't know that's what it was called. People can come up with some crazy stuff. I guess insane people can still have a creative mind.
Theres dozens of things we as a society trust science on that we cant confirm ourselves as being true. Yet because some are convinced it doesnt fit their political and or religious beliefs, people whom are normally rational and objective lose their goddamn minds and reject the science of climate change. Reminds me of when early astronomers were tortured into recanting their findings that the earth orbited the sun and not vice versa
Last edited:
Chem trails or something like that. The issue is that people try to put every theory into the conspiracy theory group. It's just a lazy way to debate.
There are too many red flags with how climate change is currently being marketed. I believe there's some truth in it, but I don't buy the whole think hook line and sinker.
No, this isn't THE WWJD, is it? I remember some grand debates on HROT with you. I don't always agree with you, but I can still respect you...kind of like @strummingram, even though he doesn't feel the same way anymore.
Do you feel this way because Democrats are the only ones left with any sense of morality or because Republicans have all but sold their souls to the devil?
No, this is because the left believes in a Puritanism version of controlling the lives of other people. Now, the left isn't burning people at the stake for what they believe they said, but the left is destroying the businesses of people for what they believe they said.
WWJD is an active UNC basketball fan.No, this isn't THE WWJD, is it? I remember some grand debates on HROT with you. I don't always agree with you, but I can still respect you...kind of like @strummingram, even though he doesn't feel the same way anymore.
This.. Al Gore’s heart might have been in the right place, I don’t know but he fvcked this whole issue up.
I think you heard the word "Puritanism" on one of your videos and now it's a large part of your conversations.
Government has been controlling the lives of other people long before those pesky Puritans.
While the right is literally murdering people for what they believe they said and stand for. There is no moral hi ground for either extremist view to claim here.
Say wha? Who on the right is murdering people? If you're talking about these mass shootings, the only one that people would consider to be "on the right" (at least that I can think of) was Dylan Roof. Who else on the right is murdering people?
I've been saying this for the last year. It's pretty obvious that PC culture is threatening to do harm to people who don't subscribe to their personal religion. Populism is the new punk and conservatism is the new counter-culture. It shouldn't be all that shocking to anyone who watched the 60's unfold.
Gore did a lot of damage to climate change. I try not to lump him in with credible climate change people, unless I'm just trying to mess with someone
, but he's not the only issue with climate change. A lot of people are getting really rich and powerful off this movement. That's more than a little disturbing to me. I have other issues as well with the movement, but I don't want to sidetrack this conversation because I think it's an important one to have.
If you want to discuss something specific, I'm always willing to do that, but talking about "isms" isn't in itself a bad thing. That being said, a strong argument could be made that being part of "isms" is a bad thing.
Last edited:
I don't usually check this forum. I was pleased to see you posting here.No, this isn't THE WWJD, is it? I remember some grand debates on HROT with you. I don't always agree with you, but I can still respect you...kind of like @strummingram, even though he doesn't feel the same way anymore.
Damn straight.
Can't wait for the season to start.
Also can't wait for the next Dem debate.
Wish there were R debates, too.
Will Tulsi be involved? I switched party affiliations from independent to Democrat, just so I could vote for her. Of course, she's getting treated like Ron Paul did.
Yeah, she’s the only sane one that’s not willing to impeach on the complaint of a partisan hack.
Last I heard she still needs to hit 2% in 2 more polls. I don't know how long she has to do that. There's some cutoff date before the debates.
I like Tulsi. It embarrasses me how some libs and lib media are treating her.
To me, her trip to Syria and meeting with Assad were courageous and needful, but some treat her like a stooge or traitor.
Which is not to say that she is without warts. Past (but now repudiated) anti-gay stance, for example. And support from a right wing Indian group. But I still like her.
Her lack of support for impeachment is another knock against her. I'm disappointed.
Okla city bombing
Charleston church
Charlottesville rally
Abortion clinic murders
Orlando Gay night club shootings
