Send their "supporters" packing as well..... i.e those pretending to be UNC fans.We will take that into consideration .................. nah!
Send their "supporters" packing as well..... i.e those pretending to be UNC fans.We will take that into consideration .................. nah!
Godevil is the one i banned. If Timo was banned another mod did it.
We ban too many people imo.
Uh... yes?
Any legitimate college has independent study classes, which are nearly always "no-show". That is the point, there is no lecture. And university professors aren't the ones grading papers the majority of the time in all classes. It is typically TA's (grad students) or someone else lower paid they can delegate that work to.
Literally every school in the country has no-show classes where the secretary grades the papers by occasionally skimming the content?
Holler at me when Duke admits to academic fraud and is put on probation.
Just to clear up this misconception - being a private school does not get Duke out of academic accountability. As I posted in response to Gary's statement earlier, Duke and UNC share the same accreditation agency. Also on that list is, for instance, Vanderbilt. Private and public schools have to be accredited in the same way.Must be nice to be a private school that can write its own rules with no accountability.
Just to clear up this misconception - being a private school does not get Duke out of academic accountability. As I posted in response to Gary's statement earlier, Duke and UNC share the same accreditation agency. Also on that list is, for instance, Vanderbilt. Private and public schools have to be accredited in the same way.
http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/webmemlist.pdf
Could you explain that a little more fully? Are you referring to things like UNC has to share Coach Williams' salary whereas Duke doesn't have to share Coach K's (since the former is a public employee whereas that latter is not)? Or are you just speaking more generally - like there seems to be more autonomy for private schools whereas public school sort of answer to the public?I understand the accreditation process. However, that doesn't address what I was referring to about the differences in "openess" between a public and private school.
Just to clear up this misconception - being a private school does not get Duke out of academic accountability. As I posted in response to Gary's statement earlier, Duke and UNC share the same accreditation agency. Also on that list is, for instance, Vanderbilt. Private and public schools have to be accredited in the same way.
http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/webmemlist.pdf
Could you explain that a little more fully? Are you referring to things like UNC has to share Coach Williams' salary whereas Duke doesn't have to share Coach K's (since the former is a public employee whereas that latter is not)? Or are you just speaking more generally - like there seems to be more autonomy for private schools whereas public school sort of answer to the public?
I could see either of those arguments. But, as you know, accreditation does not allow Duke to hide behind their "private" designation on academic issues. So I don't understand what you mean by Duke "write's its own rules" with regards to academics.
Could you explain that a little more fully? Are you referring to things like UNC has to share Coach Williams' salary whereas Duke doesn't have to share Coach K's (since the former is a public employee whereas that latter is not)? Or are you just speaking more generally - like there seems to be more autonomy for private schools whereas public school sort of answer to the public?
I could see either of those arguments. But, as you know, accreditation does not allow Duke to hide behind their "private" designation on academic issues. So I don't understand what you mean by Duke "write's its own rules" with regards to academics.
Exactly, when I see responses like the below, I seriously wonder if the poaster ever attended a university. These classes are the rule, not the exception.